Case law

Klat

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 3, 2026

Plaintiff sues the following entities: the City of San Diego, the County of San Diego, 4 the San Diego Board of Supervisors (as an entity and the individuals on the board), San 5 Diego City Attorney Heather Ferbert … See Arbaugh v.

Espinoza v. Bank of America, N.A.

823 F. Supp. 2d 1053 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 13, 2011

See United States v. Sec. Indus. … (quoting Brown v. Jensen, 41 Cal.2d 193, 195 , 259 P.2d 425 (1953)).

Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 26, 2021

Brown v. … Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 351 20 (1988); Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir. 1995). 21 Here, it would be more efficient, fair, and convenient to retain jurisdiction.

Cabrera v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2023

See Tellabs, Inc. v. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). 15 Nor could the Northern District of California exercise specific personal jurisdiction.

Hernandez-Morales

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 15, 2025

In support, Respondents rely on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Rauda v. … Rauda, 55 F.4th at 778 (citing Tazu v. Att’y Gen.

Khuasand

District Court, S.D. California · May 14, 2026

federal district court to review the immigration judge’s decision before appealing to the 27 Board … See Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1160 (9th Cir. 28 1 }}2011).

Sussman v. San Diego Police Dept.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2020

See Yagman v. Republic Ins. … v.

Nunn v. United States Liability Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 25, 2022

Co. v. … Co. v.

Briggs v. San Diego Unified Port District

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 21, 2025

BACKGROUND 27 On October 10, 2023, the governing board of the SDUPD held a public meeting 28 regarding whether to censure Commissioner Sandy Naranjo, one of Defendant’s board 1 … The SDUPD board then 10 voted to censure Plaintiff’s client. (Id. ¶ 11).

Wang

District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 2026

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004) (citing U.S. … Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973).

Vent v. Fletcher

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 28, 2022

of Supervisors (“Board”); 22 (ii) Nora Vargas, Vice Chair of the Board; (iii) Terra Lawson-Remer, Supervisor of District 23 3; (iv) Jim Desmond, Supervisor of District 5; (v) Joel Anderson, Supervisor of District 2; … See Garcia v.

In Re Immune Response Securities Litigation

375 F. Supp. 2d 983 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 7, 2005

See U.S. v. … See Gray v.

Estate of Lonnie Rupard, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2026

Cal. 1998)) (addressing a county board of supervisor's closed 5 session, the court held that “the fact that confidential communications within the privilege may 6 have been made at the board meetings does not cloak the … entire proceeding in secrecy”); 7 Anderson v.

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States

238 F. Supp. 528 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 25, 1965

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U.S. 177, 197 [ 61 S.Ct. 845, 854 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 ]. … Co. v.

Buckelew v. Gore

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2020

The California 28 Government Claims Act has strict time limits for both presenting a claim to the Claims 1 Board and filing a court action after the Claims Board rejects the claim. … Canell v. 27 Lightner, 143 F.3d 1210, 1215 (9th Cir. 1998); accord Brown v. Washington, 752 F.

Ritz Fuente, LLC v. SHS Armin Schafer Jr.

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 17, 2023

Schafer was aware 16 the horse would be boarded in San Diego County and compete there and 17 elsewhere in the United States. … Brown, 8 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). Individuals are “at home” in their state of domicile. See 9 Ford Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 141 S.

Chancy

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 21, 2025

No. 1-2 ¶ 27.) 24 Relying on the court’s reasoning in Brown v. Google, LLC, 525 F. Supp. 3d 1049, 25 1061 (N.D. … In Brown, Google requested that the 27 court take judicial notice of their terms of service, privacy policy, privacy notice, and 28 several of its webpages. Brown, 525 F. Supp. 3d at 1061.

Glastrusions, Inc. v. New Plastic Corp.

237 F. Supp. 109 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 23, 1963

Although clothed with the presumption of validity arising from its issue, this patent must be considered in the light of the arguments made by counsel before the Board of Patent Appeals wherein it was contended that the novelty … V. The amended complaint should be dismissed, upon the merits and with prejudice to the Plaintiff, and costs should be awarded in favor of Defendant. VI.

Jones v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2022

, or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board . . . .” … See Brown v. Cnty. 7 of San Bernardino, No. EDCV 20-1304 JGB (SHKx), 2021 WL 99722, at *4 (C.D.

In re Alta Vineyards Co.

87 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 15, 1949

See, Sullivan & Cromwell v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 10 Cir., 1938, 96 F.2d 219 ; Gochenour et al. v. Cleveland Terminal Bldg. Co., 8 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 991 ; Godfrey v. Powell, 5 Cir., 1947, 159 F.2d 330 . … The doctrine is traceable to Trustees v. Greenough, 1881, 105 U.S. 527, 532-535 , 26 L.Ed. 1157 . And see, Brown v. Gerdes, 1944, 321 U.S. 178, 181-183 , 64 S.Ct. 487, 489 , 88 L.Ed 659.