Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.89s

  • Haag v. San Diego Sheriff Dep

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 2019

    Ashcroft v. … Monell, 436 5 U.S. at 690; Board of the County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402-04 (1997); 6 Navarro v. Block, 72 F.3d 712, 714 (9th Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corfunding, LLC v. Elhag

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 1, 2021

    Hamilton v. … See Hargis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eljaraouy

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 8, 2026

    v. … Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 993 F.3d 640, 680 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting 10 Bresgal v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LaRose

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2026

    He has appealed that bond decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. 26 Separately, Petitioner was ordered removed to Mexico on August 7, 2025 by an 27 immigration judge. … remains ongoing. 28 /// A habeas petition is subject to summary dismissal when it is repetitive or duplicative. 2 || See, e.g., Salas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

    District Court, S.D. California · May 13, 2022

    Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Amer. Const. … Riley v. Filson, 933 F.3d 1068, 1071 (9th Cir. 2019).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marks Food Corp. v. Barbara Ann Baking Co.

    162 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 24, 1958

    In the United States v. … In United States v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Marks Food Corporation, a Corporation v. Barbara Ann Baking Co., a Corporation, 274 F.2d 934 (1960)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Luven v. Soon-Shiong

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2025

    McCown v. … Rodriguez v. W. Pub.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eischen v. Berryhill

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 27, 2020

    See, e.g., 19 Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015); Vasquez v. Astrue, 572 20 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2009); Bunnell v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 341, 343 (9th Cir. 1991); 21 Cotton v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493-494.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Segura v. City of La Mesa

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 23, 2022

    Benavidez v. Cty. of San Diego, 3 993 F.3d 1134, 1153 (9th Cir. 2021) (citing City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 387 4 (1989) and Board of the County Comm’rs v. … See Tulare, 666 F.3d at 637–38; Brown v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 11 No. EDCV 20-1304 JGB (SHKx), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7043, at *11 (C.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Phillips'petition

    167 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 23, 1958

    Local Draft Board No. 1 v. Connors, 9 Cir., 124 F.2d 388, 390 . … See also Harrison v. Northern Trust Co., 317 U.S. 476, 479 , 63 S.Ct. 361 , 87 L.Ed. 407 ; Cole v. Young, 351 U.S. 536, 550 , 76 S.Ct. 861 , 100 L.Ed. 1396 ; Shapiro v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Four Navy Seals v. Associated Press

    413 F. Supp. 2d 1136 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 12, 2005

    Leis, 255 F.3d 325, 333 (6th Cir.2001) (holding that internet bulletin board users lacked standing to assert an expectation of privacy in materials intended for publication or posting on the bulletin board.). … In Rogers v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 2022

    In June 2019, the Board approved the 16 requested modification. (Id.) Defendants have produced the relevant Board minutes. (Id.) 17 3. … (citing Barnes– 9 Hind, Inc. v. Superior Court, 181 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mayo v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 8, 2023

    See Brown-Hunter v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 15 2015) (the district court is “constrained to review the reasons the ALJ asserts”) (quoting 16 Connett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ashford

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2026

    Doe v. Mann, 2 415 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997, 1005– 3 06 (1994)); see also Bell v. … See Cooper v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garnier v. Poway Unified School District

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 14, 2021

    Albright v. … Carlson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reynolds v. Royal Mail Lines, Ltd.

    147 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 1956

    Co. v. … Corp., 2 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 277 , affirmed, 1955, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 575 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 ; Brown v. American-Hawaiian S.S. Co., 3 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 16 ; United States v. Rothschild Int. Stev.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Spector

    99 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 12, 1951

    Later in Fong Yue Ting v. … U.S.Const. art. 1, § 9; Garner v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles, 1951, 341 U.S. 716, 721 , 71 S.Ct. 909 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Borrego Community Health Foundation v. Hebets

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 2025

    When Defendant 5 Jim Hebets praised the 162B plan to Plaintiff’s Board in the spring or the summer of 2019, 6 he only disclosed his last name when a non-defendant Board member asked. … (quoting Diaz v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Feldman v. Sutton

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2022

    “Deliberate indifference is a ‘stringent standard of fault.’” 8 Patel v. Kent Sch. Dist., 648 F.3d 965, 974 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Board of the Cty. 9 Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 409 (1997) (discussing Canton).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Village Communities, LLC v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 3, 2021

    Communities, LLC (“Village Communities”) is suing Defendants 19 || the County of San Diego (the “County”) and the San Diego County Board of Supervisors 20 || (the “Board”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for claims arising … (quoting Crown Point Dev., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.