Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.35s
District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case
Cited 0 timesUnknownWentworth v. Oceanside Police Dept.
District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case
Cited 0 timesUnknownWentworth v. San Diego Sheriff's Department
District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 22, 2020
Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904-GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo 26 Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt. Inc., et al., 27 3:19-cv-01917-GPC-BLM (“Abbott matter”); Evers v. Sodexo Mgmt.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFederal Deposit Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
196 F.R.D. 375 · District Court, S.D. California · May 1, 2000
RTC v. … United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d 677, 679 (7th Cir.1990) (”[I]t is not the obligation of this court to research and construct the legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel”).
Cited 46 timesPublishedIQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 22, 2022
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER 14 , SEAL MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE 15 | SYSTEMS, INC., a California [ECF No. 34] corporation; and DALE BROWN … See McArdle v. 20 || AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 09-cv-1117, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218070, at *13-14 21 || (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown37 F. Supp. 2d 1166 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 19, 1999
Compare Francis, 532 F.2d at 273 (“The case is remanded to the Board so that the Attorney General’s discretion under Section 212(c) may be exercised.”) with INS v. … V; see also Adarand Constructors, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLerman v. Swarovski North America Limited
District Court, S.D. California · Sep 10, 2019
In 7 Brown v. Defender Security Co., 2012 WL 5308964 (C. D. … See Bob Jones Univ. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 29, 2022
Board Supervisor Ryan Kelley 27 announced that Plaintiffs were breaking the board meeting rules. See FAC ¶ 16. … This protected conduct covers newspaper articles concerning local 20 government board meetings, Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co., 37 21 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown237 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 1964
The District Court of Appeal of California in People v. … In Jones v.
Cited 14 timesPublished14 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 1936
Interstate Transit, Inc., v. Lindsey, 283 U.S. 183 , 51 S.Ct. 380 , 75 L.Ed. 953 ; Young's Market Co. v. State Board of Equalization (D.C.) 12 F.Supp. 140 , and cited authorities. … Gibbons v. Ogden (1825) 9 Wheat. 1, 70 , 6 L.Ed. 23 ; Board of Trustees of University of Illinois v. United States (1933) 289 U.S. 48 , 53 S.Ct. 509 , 77 L.Ed. 1025 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 20, 2024
Brody v. … See 21 U.S. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown150 F. Supp. 864 · District Court, S.D. California · May 9, 1957
Hawley v. U. S., 10 Cir., 133 F.2d 966 ; People v. Jones, 42 Cal.2d 219 , 266 P.2d 38 . … Ungar v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2025
Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 535 n.13 (2011) (quoting Wilkinson v. Dotson, 6 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); Preiser v. … Spitsyn v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd
District Court, S.D. California · Feb 8, 2022
Ests. of Byrd v. Gen. Motors 9 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002); see also San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. U.S. 10 Dist. Ct.—N. Dist. … Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto.
Cited 0 timesUnknown933 F. Supp. 1536 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1996
Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1722-23 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), for the proposition that “the Supreme Court has never attributed a great deal of significance to contemporaneous remarks of a sponsor of legislation … In Waymer , the defendant was a member of the Atlanta Board of Education who entered into a business relationship with the president of a service company.
Cited 14 timesPublishedByron Jackson Co. v. United States
35 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 26, 1940
Co. v. … See: Board of Commissioners v. United States, 1939, 308 U.S. 343, 349, 350 , 60 S.Ct. 285 , 84 *668 L.Ed. 313; Deitrick v. Greaney, 1940, 309 U.S. 190, 200 , 60 S.Ct. 480 , 84 L.Ed. 864 .
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna