Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.35s

  • Hudson v. Gulley

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

    Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hudson v. Clark

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

    Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wentworth v. Oceanside Police Dept.

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

    Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wentworth v. San Diego Sheriff's Department

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

    Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hudson v. Buck

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

    Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Appiah v. Kriedman

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

    Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 22, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904-GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo 26 Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt. Inc., et al., 27 3:19-cv-01917-GPC-BLM (“Abbott matter”); Evers v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

    196 F.R.D. 375 · District Court, S.D. California · May 1, 2000

    RTC v. … United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d 677, 679 (7th Cir.1990) (”[I]t is not the obligation of this court to research and construct the legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel”).

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 22, 2022

    FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER 14 , SEAL MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE 15 | SYSTEMS, INC., a California [ECF No. 34] corporation; and DALE BROWN … See McArdle v. 20 || AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 09-cv-1117, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218070, at *13-14 21 || (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gutierrez-Perez v. Fasano

    37 F. Supp. 2d 1166 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 19, 1999

    Compare Francis, 532 F.2d at 273 (“The case is remanded to the Board so that the Attorney General’s discretion under Section 212(c) may be exercised.”) with INS v. … V; see also Adarand Constructors, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lerman v. Swarovski North America Limited

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 10, 2019

    In 7 Brown v. Defender Security Co., 2012 WL 5308964 (C. D. … See Bob Jones Univ. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ryan v. County of Imperial

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 29, 2022

    Board Supervisor Ryan Kelley 27 announced that Plaintiffs were breaking the board meeting rules. See FAC ¶ 16. … This protected conduct covers newspaper articles concerning local 20 government board meetings, Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co., 37 21 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Varga v. Rosenberg

    237 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 1964

    The District Court of Appeal of California in People v. … In Jones v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Morf v. Ingels

    14 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 1936

    Interstate Transit, Inc., v. Lindsey, 283 U.S. 183 , 51 S.Ct. 380 , 75 L.Ed. 953 ; Young's Market Co. v. State Board of Equalization (D.C.) 12 F.Supp. 140 , and cited authorities. … Gibbons v. Ogden (1825) 9 Wheat. 1, 70 , 6 L.Ed. 23 ; Board of Trustees of University of Illinois v. United States (1933) 289 U.S. 48 , 53 S.Ct. 509 , 77 L.Ed. 1025 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Watt v. Block, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 20, 2024

    Brody v. … See 21 U.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gilles v. Del Guercio

    150 F. Supp. 864 · District Court, S.D. California · May 9, 1957

    Hawley v. U. S., 10 Cir., 133 F.2d 966 ; People v. Jones, 42 Cal.2d 219 , 266 P.2d 38 . … Ungar v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Secretary of CDCR

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2025

    Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 535 n.13 (2011) (quoting Wilkinson v. Dotson, 6 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); Preiser v. … Spitsyn v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 8, 2022

    Ests. of Byrd v. Gen. Motors 9 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002); see also San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. U.S. 10 Dist. Ct.—N. Dist. … Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Frega

    933 F. Supp. 1536 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1996

    Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1722-23 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), for the proposition that “the Supreme Court has never attributed a great deal of significance to contemporaneous remarks of a sponsor of legislation … In Waymer , the defendant was a member of the Atlanta Board of Education who entered into a business relationship with the president of a service company.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Byron Jackson Co. v. United States

    35 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 26, 1940

    Co. v. … See: Board of Commissioners v. United States, 1939, 308 U.S. 343, 349, 350 , 60 S.Ct. 285 , 84 *668 L.Ed. 313; Deitrick v. Greaney, 1940, 309 U.S. 190, 200 , 60 S.Ct. 480 , 84 L.Ed. 864 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.