Case law

Page v. Tri-City Healthcare District

860 F. Supp. 2d 1154 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2012

Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir.2012). … Brown, 671 F.3d 1052, 1074 (9th Cir.2012). 17 Thus, the Court REMANDS this case, including all pending motions, to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. 18 The Clerk shall close the file.

Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. United States

64 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, S.D. California · May 9, 1945

That is also forcefully, I think, illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v. … “V.

Wentworth v. California Board of Education

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 23, 2021

O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 15 617 (9th Cir. 1990) (quoting Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1228 (9th Cir.1984)). … See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th 18 Cir. 1995) (quoting Bailey v.

Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. ComicMix LLC

256 F. Supp. 3d 1099 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 9, 2017

Browne v. McCain, 611 F.Supp.2d 1073, 1078 (C.D. Cal. 2009) (citing Four Navy Seals v. Assoc. Press, 413 F.Supp.2d 1136, 1148 (S.D. Cal. 2005); Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. … Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1242 (9th Cir. 2013); E.S.S. Entm’t, 547 F.3d at 1099 .

Vaught IV v. Board of Parole

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 2, 2021

(1) DENYING MOTION TO 11 BOARD OF PAROLE; CDCR; PROCEED IN FORMA M. … Bias v.

Blue & Gold Stamps-U-Save Premium Co. v. Sobieski

190 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 1961

State Board of Equalization, D.C.Cal.1937, 21 F.Supp. 604, 606 . … See the writer’s opinion in Brown v. Parker, D.C.1941, 39 F.Supp. 895 , the conclusions in which were approved by the Supreme Court in Parker v. Brown, 1943, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 .

Imperial Capital Bancorp, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In re Imperial Capital Bancorp, Inc.)

492 B.R. 25 · District Court, S.D. California · May 16, 2013

is not expressly reflected in the board minutes. … The Bank’s reliance on Lubin v.

Brown

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 3, 2026

(ECF No. 44) 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Cynthia-Yvette Brown’s Motion to Rescind 18 and Void … (first citing Williams v. Yuan Chen, 1 || No. S-10-1292-CKD-P, 2011 WL 4354533, at * 3 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2011); then citing 2 || Bradford v. Ogbuehi, No. 1:17-CV-01128-SAB (PC), 2020 WL 9886194, at *1 (E.D.

Gray v. Commodity Credit Corporation

63 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 1, 1945

Brown, 1943, Em.App., 137 F.2d 654, 659 ; Brown v. Wright, 1943, 4 Cir., 137 F.2d 484, 489 ; Lakemore Co. v. Brown, 1943, Em.App., 137 F.2d 355 ; Chatlos v. Brown, 1943, Em.App., 136 F.2d 490 ; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. … See: Wilson v. Brown, 1943, Em.App., 137 F.2d 348 ; Taylor v. Brown, 1943, Em.App., 137 F.2d 654, 659 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 1944, 321 U.S. 503, 517 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . The masterly summary of Mr.

Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United States

22 F. Supp. 119 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 12, 1938

North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U.S. 417 , 52 S.Ct. 613, 615 , 76 L.Ed. 1197, 1200 , 11 A.F.T.R. 16 . See, also, Burnet v. Harmel, 2- 87 U.S. 103 , 53 S.Ct. 74 , 77 L.Ed. 199 , 11 A.F.T.R. 1085 ; Board v. … that board at its discretion.

Trenkle v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

179 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 1960

The longshoremen removed from the hatch some of the hatch boards, which boards were placed in lockers adjacent to the hatch. The hold men then proceeded to the ’tween deck where their work was to be-performed. … Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., 355 U.S. 563 , 78 S.Ct. 438 , 2 L.Ed.2d 491 ; Brown v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co., 3 Cir., 211 F.2d 16 ; Oleszcuk v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, D.C., 164 F.Supp. 628 .

Vitco v. Joncich

130 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 29, 1955

National Labor Relations Board, 1944, 323 U.S. 248 , 65 S.Ct. 238 , 89 L.Ed. 216 ; Ahlquist v. Alaska-Portland Packers’ Ass’n, 9 Cir., 1930, 39 F.2d 348 . … See: Farrell v. United States, supra, 336 U.S. at pages 519-521, 69 S.Ct. 707 , 93 L.Ed. 850 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 1940, 309 U.S. 206 , 60 S.Ct. 493 , 84 L.Ed. 704 ; Jones v.

Dellaverson v. Laird

351 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 7, 1972

United States, 419 F.2d 187, 191 (6th Cir. 1969); Smith v. Resor, 406 F.2d 141, 145 (2nd Cir. 1969); Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2nd Cir. 1968); Winters v. … Antonuk v. United States, supra; Schatten v. United States, supra; Smith v. Resor, supra; Fox v. Brown, supra; O’Mara v. Zebrowski, supra.

McKee & Company v. First National Bank of San Diego

265 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 1967

Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., 414 Pa. 325 , 200 A.2d 398 (1964).” … In Sonzinsky v.

In Re West Coast Cabinet Works, Inc.

92 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 4, 1950

It was said in Vermilya-Brown Co. v. … See Brown v.

Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC

145 F. Supp. 3d 962 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 2015

Station v. … See Segal v.

Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here Int'l Union

346 F. Supp. 3d 1365 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 28, 2018

As another tactic, Pauma alleges the Union "went berserk," filing a flurry of unfair labor practice charges against Casino Pauma with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"). (SAC ¶ 5.) … Brown, Jr. (collectively, "State").

Simmons v. Westover

76 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 1948

In support, he cites two Board of Tax Appeals cases, — D. J. Gay v. Commissioner, 31 B.T.A. 580 and Union Shipbuilding Co. v. Commissioner, 43 B.T.A. 1143 . … Co. v. United States, D.C., 3 F.Supp. 508 , and W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v.

Estate of Kevin Brown v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 2, 2020

Relief Soc'y v. … Sonner v.

Estate of Kevin Brown v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 2020

Shimko v. … Lee v. City 25 of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 2001), also includes expansive language on the 26 right to familial association. Id. at 685 (quoting Board of Dir. v.