Case law

Bryant

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 2026

v. … Board of Education].”) (cleaned up). The chilling effect is particularly concerning where the case raises issues of public importance, as Bryant’s does. See Hunter v.

Haskell v. Brown

677 F. Supp. 2d 1187 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 2009

See Norman-Bloodsaw v. … See Banks v.

Koller v. Brown

224 F. Supp. 3d 871 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2016

(quoting McPherson v. … See Leiva-Perez v.

Chote v. Brown

342 F. Supp. 1353 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1972

Georgia Socialist Workers Party v. Fortson, 315 F.Supp. 1035 (N.D.Ga. 1970); Jenness v. Little, 306 F.Supp. 925 (N.D.Ga.1969) 1 and, specifically, upon Carter v. … In Haag v.

Haskell v. Brown

317 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 2018

Rise v. … (citing Gerstein v.

Brown v. Harris

491 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 1980

See Affidavits of Rosa Gamez and Doris Brown. There is no need for the Court to embark on a detailed examination of legislative history and intent. The language of the statute is clear and definite. … Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 297 U.S. 129, 134 , 56 S.Ct. 397, 400 , 80 L.Ed. 528 (1936). See also Dixon v.

Toensing v. Brown

374 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 1974

See Insley v. … Brown retired effective January, 1972; Gail Gordon retired effective February, 1972; Dave Williams and' Alfred A. Figone retired effective June, 1972.

Brown v. Wood

59 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 1943

Bolbol v. Brown

120 F. Supp. 3d 1010 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2015

Coal to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir.2012). The state official “ ‘must have some connection with the enforcement of the act.’ ” Id. … Mujica v. AirScan Inc., 771 F.3d 580 , 593 & n. 8 (9th Cir.2014); Dumas v. Kipp, 90 F.3d 386, 393 (9th Cir.1996).

Armstrong v. Brown

857 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2012

V. Constitutionality under Printz v. United States and New York v. … In Johnson v.

Armstrong v. Brown

103 F. Supp. 3d 1070 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2015

They allege that Defendants Brown, et ah, continue to place Class Members in administrative segregation due to a lack of accessible housing.

Armstrong v. Brown

805 F. Supp. 2d 918 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 2011

Brown, Jr., et al., dispute the hourly rates at which Plaintiffs’ counsel should be compensated for work completed in 2010. Plaintiffs move to compel compensation at hourly rates they assert to be reasonable. … Moreno v. City of Sacramento, 534 F.3d 1106, 1114 (9th Cir.2008). The party seeking an award of attorneys’ fees bears the burden of establishing the reasonableness of the hourly rates requested. Camacho v.

Grimm v. Brown

291 F. Supp. 1011 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 1968

Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474 , 79 S.Ct. 1400 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1377 ; Brown v. Gamage, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 269 , 377 F.2d 154 . … (p. 87, 63 S.Ct. p. 459) See, also, Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1940).

Brown v. Heinze

248 F. Supp. 293 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 14, 1965

“THE CLERK: Benjamin Jerrel Brown, you are charged in an Information filed by the District Attorney with the crime of grand theft. … Burke, 334 U.S. 736 , 68 S.Ct. 1252 , 92 L.Ed. 1690 ; Brown v. Cox, 10 Cir., 347 F.2d 936 ; Broadus v. Lowry, 6 Cir., 245 F.2d 304 ; and United States ex rel. Hazen v. Maroney, D.C., 217 F.Supp. 328 ).

Armstrong v. Brown

939 F. Supp. 2d 1012 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 2013

FTC v. Affordable Media, LLC, 179 F.3d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting Stone v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 968 F.2d 850 , 856 n. 9 (9th Cir.1992)). … Plaintiffs request, and Defendants do not oppose, that the Court take judicial notice of excerpts of Defendants' MHSDS Program Guide, which was filed in Coleman v. Brown, Case No. 90-520. .

Zupan v. Brown

5 F. Supp. 2d 792 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 1998

The Fifth Circuit in McGrew v. … Y., 610 F.2d 449, 453 (6th Cir.1979) (to maintain a habeas action, petitioner must be “in custody” and that custody must be the result of respondent’s action from which petitioner seeks relief); Brown v.

Brown ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Oil Workers International Union

80 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 1948

A petition has been filed in this Court by the duly constituted representative of the National Labor Relations Board against the Oil Workers International Union as well as the Local, seeking injunctive relief under Section … I asked counsel for the National Labor Relations Board very pointedly this morning several questions with respect to the present condition confronting the National Labor Relations Board as well as, collaterally, the Union

Martinez v. Brown

449 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 1978

Schwartz v. … In Saal v. Middendorf, 427 F.Supp. 192 (1977), a discharge board had recommended a general discharge for homosexuality under the same BUPERSMAN § 3420185 Regulation which is involved in this action.

Brown v. Rumsfeld

211 F.R.D. 601 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 2002

Beliveau v. Caras, 873 F.Supp. 1393, 1396 (C.D.Cal.1995); see also Haddock v. Board of Dental Examiners of CA 777 F.2d 462, 464 (9th Cir.1985). … See Havas v. Thornton, 609 F.2d 372, 376 (9th Cir.1979); see also Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir.1987). Lastly, in Haines v.

Brown v. Ayello

50 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 1943

Four other suits involving an alleged yiolation of Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 269 are pending before Judge Roche and Judge Goodman, entitled as follows: Brown v. Magnani et al., No. 22499- R; Brown v. … Catronova et al., No. 22500- G; Brown v. Spotorno et al., No. 22503-R; and Brown v. Amaro et al., No. 22502-G. In each of these actions the constitutionality of the Act has been similarly attacked.