Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.44s

  • Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Codding

    423 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1976

    Codding, C-75-2706, and Codding v. … Plaintiff argues that Otter Tail Power Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Phoenix Solutions Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    254 F.R.D. 568 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 2008

    Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 237 F.R.D. 618, 621 (N.D.Cal.2006) (Patel, J.). … See, e.g., Brown Bag Software v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Yee Gee

    17 F.2d 653 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1927

    Christy v. Leong Don (C. C. A.) 5 F.(2d) 135, 136 . … Gambroulis v. Nash, 12 F.(2d) 49 at page 51; Mah Shee v. White, 242 F. 868 (C. C. A. 9); Chew Hoy Quong v. White, 249 F. 869 (C. C. A. 9). Yee Gee is a laborer, of a class excluded by the Chinese laws.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bush v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

    77 F. Supp. 3d 900 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 2015

    See Brown v. J.B. Hunt Transp. Servs., Inc., 586 F.3d 1079, 1087 (8th Cir.2009) (holding insurer violated section 503(2) and ordering remand); VanderKlok v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. … See, e.g., Brown v. J.B. Hunt Transp. Servs., Inc., 586 F.3d 1079, 1088 (8th Cir.2009). Nevertheless, this distinction is merely stylistic, as Count V references section 502(a)(3) in paragraph 177.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Drainer

    65 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 1946

    United States v. McDonald, 2 Cir., 265 F. 695 ; Naval Courts and Boards, Section 334 at page 92; Winthrop, Military Law and Precedence, 2nd Ed. (1920) at page 89. … In United States v. Dunn, 120 U.S. 249 , 7 S.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Folsom

    25 F. Cas. 1131 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 1862

    , but which, up to the time of the final confirmation of the decree of the board, it had been contended should not be included. … That the board anc the courts had, under the act of 1851, jurisdiction to determine “all questions as to extent. quantity, location, and boundary,” has been expressly decided by the supreme court. [U. S. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shiferaw v. City and County of San Francisco

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 2021

    Amos Brown (“Rev. … Brown”); Joaquin Torres (“Torres”), Director of the Mayor’s Office of 26 Workforce and Economic Development; Naomi Kelly (“Kelly”), the City Administrator; and San Francisco Supervisor Vallie Brown (“Supervisor Brown

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Seebach v. Cullen

    224 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 1, 1963

    Thomas v. Ward, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 302 , 225 F.2d 953 (1955), cert. denied 350 U.S. 958 , 76 S.Ct. 348 , 100 L.Ed. 833 (1955); De Fino v. … Jones v. Hobby, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 53 , 223 F.2d 345 (1955).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company

    253 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 1966

    Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336-337 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Crown Zellerbach Corporation v. … This is precisely what the Supreme Court refused to do in Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • SeaRiver Maritime, Inc. v. Industrial Medical Services, Inc.

    983 F. Supp. 1287 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1997

    Quazzo, and Christine Banks of MeCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen. … See Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Villasenor v. Community Child Care Council of Santa Clara County, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 6, 2020

    Harlick v. … Mitchell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States Ex Rel. Fine v. University of California

    821 F. Supp. 1356 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 1993

    Fine v. Chevron, U.S.A., No. C91-3224 (N.D.Cal.). Mr. … Doe v. John Doe Corp., 960 F.2d 318, 324 (2nd Cir.1992).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stenzel v. United States

    150 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 1957

    United States v. Ridley, D.C., 120 F. Supp. 530 ; Owen v. United States, D.C., 134 F.Supp. 31, 39 ; Jones v. Wood, Apr. 25, 1956, 56-1 USTC 94 , 98; Glass v. Dunn, Jul. 9, 1956, 56-2 USTC 9840 . 2 . Brown v. … United States, May 25, 1956, 1956-P-H, par. 72,703; Peterson v. United States, D.C., 141 F.Supp. 382 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Stanford Daily v. Zurcher

    366 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1973

    Hall v. Cole, 412 U.S. 1 , 93 S.Ct. 1943 , 36 L.Ed.2d 702 (1973); Northcross v. Memphis Board of Ed., 412 U.S. 427 , 93 S.Ct. 2201 , 37 L.Ed.2d 48 (1973); Sims v. … Separate School Dist., 338 F.Supp. 1376 (N.D.Miss.1972); Local. 4076 United Steelworkers v. United Steelworkers, 338 F.Supp. 1154 (W.D.Pa.1972); Moore v. Knowles, 333 F. Supp. 53 (N.D.Tex.1971); Brown v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Western Lumber Mfg. Co. v. United States

    9 F.2d 1004 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1925

    The West Aleta (Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation), D. C., 7 F.(2d) 893, 895 . … Markle v. United States, 8 F.(2d) 87 , 1925 A. M. C. 1236, 1240. After due consideration, I am inclined to agree with Judge Learned Hand, who in Agros Corporation v. United States, 8 F.(2d) 84 , 1923 A. M.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation

    37 F. Supp. 3d 1126 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2014

    Pooley v. … Brown University, 5 F.3d 658 , 669 (3d Cir.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pratt v. Rowland

    856 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 1994

    Co. v. Pine Mountain Corp., 724 F.2d 827 , 830 (9th Cir.1984). B. … Meriwether v. Coughlin, 879 F.2d 1037 (2d Cir.1989).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fricke-Parks Press, Inc. v. Fang

    149 F. Supp. 2d 1175 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2001

    Since the antitrust laws “were enacted for ‘the protection of competition, not competitors,’” Brunswick, 429 U.S. at 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 (emphasis in original) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. … See Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 221-27 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993) (price discrimination); Rebel Oil Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chowdhury v. Northwest Airlines Corp.

    238 F. Supp. 2d 1153 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 2002

    Defendants contend that the decision whether to board a passenger falls within the definition of “service.” Binding Ninth Circuit law forecloses defendants’argument. In Charas v. … In Woodson v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 67 F.Supp.2d 554 (M.D.N.C.1999), for example, African-American passengers sued for racial discrimination for being denied boarding.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation

    281 F.R.D. 531 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 2012

    For example, in Brown v. … No. 1062-1, p. 11 of 26 (Order entered in Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.).

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.