Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.66s

  • Ex Parte Wong So Wan

    82 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 1948

    Lindenau v. Watkins, D.C., 73 F.Supp. 216 ; In re United States ex rel. Obum, D.C.S.D. N.Y., 82 F.Supp. 36 ; Wong Yang Sung v. Clark, D.C.D.C., 80 F.Supp. 235 . … . § 152 ; Ngim Ah Oy v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Walberg v. Smyth

    142 F. Supp. 293 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1956

    Brown . 6,000.00 2.17% 2% Jane S. … Snyder v. Westover, 9 Cir., 217 F.2d 928 ; Pike v. United States, 9 Cir., 231 F.2d 688 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Karahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Presidio

    534 F. Supp. 1202 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1982

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Colm v. Vance, 567 F.2d 1125, 1127-28 (D.C. Cir.1977).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Fey v. Board of Pensions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2020

    C 19-05914 WHA 12 v. 13 BOARD OF PENSIONS OF THE ORDER GRANTING EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN … Docksider Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Blodgett v. County of Santa Cruz

    502 F. Supp. 204 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 21, 1980

    In this case against the Board of Supervisors of Santa Cruz County (“the Board”) and certain individual members brought by plaintiffs, Elizabeth Blodgett and Richard Tarmey, charging violations of certain federal civil rights … Santa Fe Land Improvement v. City of Chula Vista, 596 F.2d 838 (9th Cir. 1979); Sederquist v. City of Tiburon, 590 F.2d 278 (9th Cir. 1978); Newport Investments v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STOTT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. County of Monterey

    601 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 10, 2009

    Id.) see, e.g., City of Mesquite v. … Compare Taylor v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Walgreen Co.

    34 F. Supp. 3d 1049 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2014

    Walgreens relies on Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir.2001). … This case is fundamentally unlike Brown.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co. v. United States

    385 F. Supp. 1075 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 19, 1974

    The State, however, continued to withhold $4,372.28 to meet the stop notice claims of Brown and Hardwick. … Acquilano v. United States, 363 U.S. 509, 613 , 80 S.Ct. 1277 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1960); Logan Planning Mill Co. v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York, 212 F.Supp. 906, 919 (S.D.W.Va.1962).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Woodson v. Board of Directors of the Harbor Hill Condominium Homeowners Association

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2020

    DISMISS 10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE Re: Dkt. … Brazil v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jewel Companies v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest

    550 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 1982

    See, Belden Corporation v. Internorth, Inc., 90 Ill.App.3d 547 , 45 Ill.Dec. 765 , 413 N.E.2d 98, 102 (1980). … See, California Corporations Code § 309(a); Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini, 109 Cal.App.2d 405, 419 , 241 P.2d 66 (1952).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Association of Mexican-American Educators ("AMAE") v. California

    836 F. Supp. 1534 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 1993

    Conroy v. … See Kennedy v. Miller, 97 Cal. 429, 432 , 32 P. 558, 559 (1893); California Teachers Ass’n v. Board of Trustees, 82 Cal.App.3d 249, 253-54 , 146 Cal.Rptr. 850, 853 (Cal.Ct.App.1978).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Mowinckel v. Dewar

    173 F. 544 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 1909

    In the case of Anderson v. … See, also, Randall v. Sprague, 74 Fed. 247 , 21 C. C. A. 334 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Lockyer

    365 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 2005

    Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and Lorillard Tobacco Company (collectively “manufacturer defendants”). … See Hoover v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Greenwood v. Ayers

    710 F. Supp. 2d 910 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 14, 2008

    Inmates of Nebraska Penal, 442 U.S. 1, 7 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) ] and [Board of Pardons v.] … Hess v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 514 F.3d 909, 913-14 (9th Cir.2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Catholic League for Religious & Civil Rights v. City & County of San Francisco

    464 F. Supp. 2d 938 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 2006

    See Bowen v. … Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Shewry, 423 F.3d 906, 918 (9th Cir.2005) (quoting Keller v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Harris

    325 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1971

    The application for voluntary induction was then forwarded to the defendant’s local board in San Jose. On April 4, 1969, defendant mailed a letter to his Local Board reaffirming his desire to volunteer for induction. … United States v. Canepa, 319 F.Supp. 1319 (N.D.Cal.1970).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haggard v. Curry

    732 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2010

    The Board stated that it would request another psychological evaluation prior to the next parole hearing. V. … Id. at 562; see also Pearson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Local Union No. 550, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners

    33 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1940

    Wilson v. United States, 221 U.S. 361 , 31 S.Ct. 538 , 55 L.Ed. 771 , Ann. Cas.1912D, 558. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Co., 259 U.S. 344 , 42 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed. 975 , 27 A.L.R. 762 ; Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. City & County

    64 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 1946

    United States v. State of California, 297 U.S. 175 , 56 S.Ct. 421 , 80 L.Ed. 567 ; State of South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 , 26 S.Ct. 110 , 50 L.Ed. 261 ; State of New York v. … Interstate Commerce Commission v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Codding

    423 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1976

    Codding, C-75-2706, and Codding v. … Plaintiff argues that Otter Tail Power Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.