Case law

Low

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 7, 2026

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF Re: Dkt. … Johnson v. Mammoth 22 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).

Saal v. Middendorf

427 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 8, 1977

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 , L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 164-167 , 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974) (Powell, J., concurring); Cleveland Board of Education v.

Morgold, Inc. v. Keeler

891 F. Supp. 1361 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 1995

O’Keeffe v. … Brown, an expert on Bricher paintings. Brown gave Keeler his opinion on the painting and some information about its prior history. Brown did not indicate that there were any disputes with respect to title.

Pooshs v. Altria Group, Inc.

331 F. Supp. 2d 1089 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2004

Reynolds Tobacco Company (“R.J.Reynolds”); Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation (“Brown & Williamson”); and Hill & Knowlton to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim came on for hearing before this court on … Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Hill & Knowlton is WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 .

Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

52 F. Supp. 3d 961 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2014

HP’s Board of Directors immediately initiated an internal investigation into the allegations. Id. ¶ 69 . Its results were presented to the Board on July 28, 2010. Id. ¶ 73 . … See Howard v.

Lopez v. Curry

721 F. Supp. 2d 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2010

In 2006, the California Board of Parole Hearings (“Board”) granted parole, but the Governor reversed their decision. … See Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797, 801-06 , 111 S.Ct. 2590 , 115 L.Ed.2d 706 (1991); Shackleford v. Hubbard, 234 F.3d 1072, 1079, n. 2 (9th Cir.2000).

Costello v. Atlas Corp.

297 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 1967

Galusha v. Fraser, 178 Cal. 653, 656 , 174 P. 311 (1918), (fraud); Leeper v. Beltrami, 53 Cal.2d 195, 207, 208 , 1 Cal.Rptr. 12 , 347 P.2d 12 , 77 A.L.R.2d 803 (1959), (duress); Agair, Inc. v. … even represented on either board, and that the boards acted properly and in good faith.

Laeken v. Wixon

84 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 1949

In Ludecke v. … Knauff v.

SIEU PHONG NGO v. Curry

745 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2010

See Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797, 801-06 , 111 S.Ct. 2590 , 115 L.Ed.2d 706 (1991); Shackleford v. Hubbard, 234 F.3d 1072, 1079, n. 2 (9th Cir.2000). … Cooke v. Solis, 606 F.3d 1206, 1213-1214 (9th Cir.2010).

Boccardo v. United States

341 F. Supp. 858 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1972

Most of the physical damage was attributable to reactions against the activities of the draft board, since the damage was primarily on the second floor of the Building, where the draft board is located, or below. … As noted in Harris v.

Kruger v. United Airlines, Inc.

481 F. Supp. 2d 1005 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 2007

They were stopped at the end of the jetway and prevented from boarding. … Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Fidelity Financial Corp. v.

Teamsters Freight Checkers, Clerical Employees & Helpers Local Union No. 856 v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.

852 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1994

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Eisenberg v. Insurance Co. of North America, 815 F.2d 1285, 1288-89 (9th Cir.1987). … Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Intel Corp. v. Hartford Accident and Ins. Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991).

Haggard v. Curry

732 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2010

The Board stated that it would request another psychological evaluation prior to the next parole hearing. V. … Id. at 562; see also Pearson v.

Air Cal, Inc. v. City of San Francisco

638 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 6, 1986

United States v. Contra Costa County Water District, 678 F.2d 90, 91 (9th Cir.1982); Castaneda v. Dura-Vent Corp., 648 F.2d 612, 619 (9th Cir.1981). … And in Pirolo v.

Ex parte Taylor

58 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 1945

The protest in Taylor v. Brown was filed prior to the institution of the criminal action against petitioner. … It would appear that the decision of the Emergency Court of Appeals in Taylor v. Brown is not res judicate insofar as it relates to the habeas corpus proceeding.

Lewis Ex Rel. National Semiconductor Corp. v. Sporck

612 F. Supp. 1316 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 9, 1985

Hiring Saffaie cannot be said to be a culpable act in and of itself, so the focus is on the permission given by the board to the alleged wrongs. In Greenspun v. Del. E. … National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, 377 U.S. 58, 66 , 84 S.Ct. 1063, 1068 , 12 L.Ed.2d 129 (1964).

United States v. Turner

815 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 1993

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). … Brown, 443 U.S. 47, 49, 52 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2639, 2641 ; Thompson v. Renting, 968 F.2d 756, 759 (8th Cir.1992).

Luong v. East Side Union High School District

265 F. Supp. 3d 1045 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2017

Drawing all reasonable inferences in Aan and Aex’s favor (Brown v. Elec. … Sellers v. The School Board of the City of Manassas, Virginia, 141 F.3d 524 (4th Cir. 1998). Though Defendant believes Sellers is *1052 “nearly identical” to this case, the court disagrees.

Larry P. v. Riles

343 F. Supp. 1306 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 1972

Carmical v. Craven, 457 F.2d 582, 586 (9th Cir. 1971). … Similarly, Brown v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Walgreen Co.

34 F. Supp. 3d 1049 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2014

Walgreens relies on Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir.2001). … This case is fundamentally unlike Brown.