Case law

Hodges v. Clark

291 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1968

Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 284 F.Supp. 749 (Conn.1968); National Student Association v. Hershey, Civil No. 3078-67 (D.C.1968); Carpenter v. Hendrix, 277 F.Supp. 660 (N.D.Ga.1967); Moskowitz v. … Kindt, 273 F.Supp. 646 (E.D.Pa.1967); Pavloff v. Local Board Number 57, 288 F. Supp. 535 (N.D.Cal.1967), app. dis. for lack of prosecution, No. 22,327 (9th Cir. 1968); see also Shiftman v.

United States v. Guevara

745 F. Supp. 2d 1039 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2010

United States v. Blom, 242 F.3d 799, 808 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. Lemons, 153 F.Supp.2d 948, 959-960 (E.D.Wis. 2001). … Similarly, the government cites United States v.

Ortega & Emigh, Inc. v. Grace Line, Inc.

72 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 1947

On this branch of the case, libelant relies upon the case of The Tuladi, D.C., 18 F.2d 627 , reversed in Leon Israel & Bros. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 5 Cir., 23 F.2d 786, 788 . … Libelant places particular reliance upon Evans v. James Webster and Bros.

Kwon v. Singapore Airlines

356 F. Supp. 2d 1041 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2003

See, e.g., Brandt v. American Airlines, 2000 WL 288393 , *7-8 (N.D.Cal.); Sethy v. Malev-Hungarian Airlines, Inc., 2000 WL 1234660 (S.D.N.Y.2000). … Maxwell v. Aer Lingus Ltd., 122 F.Supp.2d 210, 213 (D.Mass.2000).

Luong v. East Side Union High School District

265 F. Supp. 3d 1045 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2017

Drawing all reasonable inferences in Aan and Aex’s favor (Brown v. Elec. … Sellers v. The School Board of the City of Manassas, Virginia, 141 F.3d 524 (4th Cir. 1998). Though Defendant believes Sellers is *1052 “nearly identical” to this case, the court disagrees.

Wofford v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

78 F.R.D. 460 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 1978

Brown v. D.C. Transit System, Inc., 173 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 133-134 , 523 F.2d 725, 728-729 (1975); Smith v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 486 F.2d 512, 514 (5 Cir. 1973); Thomas v. … E. g., Senter v. General Motors Corp., supra, 532 F.2d at 42—424; Lamphere v. Brown University, 71 F.R.D. 641, 646-648 (D.R.I.1976), app. dismissed, 553 F.2d 714 (1 Cir. 1977); Martinez v.

United States v. Bryson

16 F.R.D. 450 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1953

United States v. Eisler, D.C., 75 F.Supp. 634 . In other actions not related to Section 1001 it has been held that the District where the mailing took place has venue. Bridgeman v. … United States, 9 Cir., 1905, 140 F. 577 ; United States v. Downey, D.R.I.1919, 257 F. 366 ; In re Palliser, 1890, 136 U.S. 257 , 10 S.Ct. 1034 , 34 L.Ed. 514 ; United States v.

United States v. Crocker-Anglo National Bank

277 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 1967

United States v. … Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Barkis v. California Almond Growers' Exchange

17 F.2d 327 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 1925

In Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37, 41 ( 23 L. … No one could lawfully appropriate it to himself, and exclude others from using it in any usual way for any purpose,” Brown v. PiperJ supra.

Martial v. The Eclipse

53 F. 273 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 14, 1892

In McCarty v. The City of Bedford, 4 Fed. … Schell’s Ex’r v. Fauche, 138 U. S. 562 -772, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 376. See, also, Railway Co. v. Phelps, 137 U. S. 528 -536, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 168; Merritt v. Cameron, 137 U. S. 542 -752, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174.

Marsh v. Burrell

805 F. Supp. 1493 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1992

Browne v. … Judge Schwarzer’s ruling in Browne, 504 F.Supp. at 518-19 , does not counsel a different result.

Pratt v. United Air Lines, Inc.

468 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 1978

The next step in the grievance procedure is arbitration before the System Board of Adjustment (the “Board”) at either the Union’s or the employee’s request. … before the Board.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hahn Truong

98 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 12, 2000

V. … To support this view of the legal standard, they cite to Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 219-30 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993), Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v.

The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 2025

See Roth v. Garcia Marquez, 942 F.2d 617, 628 (9th Cir. 1991). Thus, requests for 16 leave to amend should be granted with “extreme liberality.” Brown v. … See Lockheed Martin 18 Corp. v.

Taylor v. The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2022

See Silber v. … Radcliffe v. Experian Info.

McLeod Lumber Co. v. Crowley

8 F.2d 283 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1925

No receipt was given for any poles until they had been loaded on board the vessel. Both her mates testified that the officers did not know whether or not those in tho third raft were intended to be shipped on board her. … since they were “deposited for the purpose of being carried without further orders,” respondents’ liability as carriers “began with the receipt of the goods.” 1 Moore on Carriers (2d Ed.) 170; Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v.

Sierra Club v. Pruitt

293 F. Supp. 3d 1050 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 16, 2018

In 1992, the California Air Resources Board ("CARB") had classified formaldehyde as a toxic air contaminant and determined that there was no safe level of exposure. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 , 125, 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (quoting ETSI Pipeline Project v. Missouri, 484 U.S. 495 , 517, 108 S.Ct. 805 , 98 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988) ).

Solyndra Residual Trust ex rel. Neilson v. Suntech Power Holdings Co.

62 F. Supp. 3d 1027 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2014

Newcal Indus., Inc. v. Ikon Office Solution, 513 F.3d 1038, 1044 (9th Cir.2008). A “relevant market” has two dimensions: the “relevant geographic market” and the “relevant product market.” Brown Shoe v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

STOTT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. County of Monterey

601 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 10, 2009

Id.) see, e.g., City of Mesquite v. … Compare Taylor v.

In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

304 B.R. 395 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2004

Ecology, Inc. v. … The Municipal Objectors cite Bock v.