Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

2.05s

  • Nordyke v. County of Santa Clara

    933 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 1996

    Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., 897 F.2d 1572, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1990); Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corp., 888 F.2d 609, 612 (9th Cir.1989). IV. DISCUSSION A. Speech vs. … As the Court pointed out in Rubin v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Accuray, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

    757 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2010

    Schneider v. Cal. … South Ferry LP v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Vo

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 2026

    Winter v. … Friends of the Wild Swan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cappa v. Wiseman

    469 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 1979

    Manning v. Wiscombe, 498 F.2d 1311, 1313 (10th Cir. 1974); Lewis v. Owens, 338 F.2d 740 (6th Cir. 1964). … NLRB v. Scientific Nutrition Corp., 180 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1950); Lewis v. Lowry, 295 F.2d 197 (4th Cir. 1961), cert, denied, 368 U.S. 977 , 82 S.Ct. 478 , 7 L.Ed.2d 438 (1962). In NLRB v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Simpson

    135 F. Supp. 802 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 1955

    S. v. Copeland, D.C.Conn.1954, 126 F.Supp. 734 . … It adds nothing to those provisions or to the duties of the local board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc.

    714 F. Supp. 1028 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 1989

    Accord: Brown v. … Scott, 827 F.2d 589 (9th Cir.1987); Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen’s Union of the Pacific, 777 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir.1985); Brown v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., 680 F.Supp. 1212 (N.D.Ill.1988); Seid v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Petersen v. Clark

    285 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1968

    Pavloff v. Board No. 57, Civ. No. 47407, N.D.Cal. August 3, 1967, reached the same result. … Cf., Carpenter v. Hendrix, supra; Pavloff v. Board No. 57, supra. Therefore, it is ordered that the complaint, as unamended, is dismissed with leave to amend.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McGee v. Richmond Unified School District

    306 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 11, 1969

    Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966). … (p. 289) See also: Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 (1966); Johnson v. Branch, 364 F.2d 177 (Cir. 4, 1966).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Acorn v. Household International, Inc.

    211 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 2002

    Data Disc, v. … Modesto City Sch., 157 F.Supp.2d at 1135 (exercising personal jurisdiction where subsidiary’s board members were directors of parent corporation); Bulova Watch Co. v. K.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • North Coast Transp. Co. v. United States

    54 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 1944

    “Applications for certificates” are included in the “matters” to be referred to a joint board. … United States v. Northern Pacific R. Co., 288 U.S. 490, 494 , 53 S. Ct. 406, 407 , 77 L.Ed. 914 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Karahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Presidio

    544 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 1982

    This, the DLI asserts, would defeat the purpose of the preemption of labor disputes by labor boards, which is to “shield the system from conflicting regulation of conduct.” Amalgamated Ass’n of Street, etc. v. … Case Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U.S. 332 [ 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 ].

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Alvarez Ex Rel. Alvarez v. Fountainhead, Inc.

    55 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, N.D. California · May 14, 1999

    Ass’n. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988). The Court also considers the public interest in ruling on a motion for preliminary-injunction. See Chalk v. United States Dist. Court Cent. … Bragdon v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dees v. California State University, Hayward

    33 F. Supp. 2d 1190 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 1998

    And while Plaintiff sought numerous other legal remedies before the Workers Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”), the Public Employment Relations Board (“PERB”), the State Personnel Board (“SPB”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity … The “ ‘defense of laches requires unreasonable delay plus either acquiescence in the act about which plaintiff complains or prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay.’ ” Brown, 166 Cal.App.3d at 1158, 213 Cal.Rptr

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Somers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.

    119 F. Supp. 3d 1088 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2015

    FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000); see generally Antonin: Scalia & Bryan A. … Congress has further required attorneys to report such evidence “to the audit committee, of the board of directors ... or to another committee of the board of directors” if “the counsel or officer does not appropriately respond

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. $831,160.45 UNITED STATES CURRENCY

    607 F. Supp. 1407 · District Court, N.D. California · May 6, 1985

    In United States v. … United States v. $4,255,625.29, 528 F.Supp. 969, 971-972 (S.D.Fla.1981); see also One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc.

    100 F. Supp. 3d 851 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 2015

    Defendants cite Brown v. Pacific Life Insurance, 462 F.3d 384, 389 (5th Cir.2006), in support of their argument that the second circumstance is satisfied here. … However, Brown did not apply California law and is not controlling authority. See id.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Davidson

    331 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 2, 1970

    Negre v. Larsen, 418 F.2d 908 (9th Cir. 1969). … Rabbito v. Larson, No. C-70 572 (N.D.Cal. 8/19/70). See also Goodwin v. Laird, supra; Silberberg v. Willis, 306 F.Supp. 1013, 1021 (D.Mass.1969), rev’d on other grounds, 420 F.2d 662 (1st Cir. 1970).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • MH Pillars Ltd. v. Realini

    277 F. Supp. 3d 1077 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2017

    Sparling v. Daou, 411 F.3d 1006, 1013 (9th Cir. 2005). … See Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007)1 The court may consider matters that are properly the subject of judicial notice, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fishkin v. United States Civil Service Commission

    309 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, N.D. California · May 19, 1969

    Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Cramp v. … Bullitt, supra; Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 , 86 S.Ct. 1238 , 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, supra. 6 . See, American Communications Ass’n v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Peralta Community College District

    766 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 1991

    Sigert v. Gilley, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1789 , 114 L.Ed.2d 277 (1991); Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976). … See Price v. Akaka, 928 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir.1990). 6 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.