Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
2.05s
Nordyke v. County of Santa Clara
933 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 1996
Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., 897 F.2d 1572, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1990); Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corp., 888 F.2d 609, 612 (9th Cir.1989). IV. DISCUSSION A. Speech vs. … As the Court pointed out in Rubin v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn Re Accuray, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
757 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2010
Schneider v. Cal. … South Ferry LP v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 2026
Winter v. … Friends of the Wild Swan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown469 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 1979
Manning v. Wiscombe, 498 F.2d 1311, 1313 (10th Cir. 1974); Lewis v. Owens, 338 F.2d 740 (6th Cir. 1964). … NLRB v. Scientific Nutrition Corp., 180 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1950); Lewis v. Lowry, 295 F.2d 197 (4th Cir. 1961), cert, denied, 368 U.S. 977 , 82 S.Ct. 478 , 7 L.Ed.2d 438 (1962). In NLRB v.
Cited 15 timesPublished135 F. Supp. 802 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 1955
S. v. Copeland, D.C.Conn.1954, 126 F.Supp. 734 . … It adds nothing to those provisions or to the duties of the local board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMilne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc.
714 F. Supp. 1028 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 1989
Accord: Brown v. … Scott, 827 F.2d 589 (9th Cir.1987); Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen’s Union of the Pacific, 777 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir.1985); Brown v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., 680 F.Supp. 1212 (N.D.Ill.1988); Seid v.
Cited 5 timesPublished285 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1968
Pavloff v. Board No. 57, Civ. No. 47407, N.D.Cal. August 3, 1967, reached the same result. … Cf., Carpenter v. Hendrix, supra; Pavloff v. Board No. 57, supra. Therefore, it is ordered that the complaint, as unamended, is dismissed with leave to amend.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMcGee v. Richmond Unified School District
306 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 11, 1969
Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966). … (p. 289) See also: Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 (1966); Johnson v. Branch, 364 F.2d 177 (Cir. 4, 1966).
Cited 1 timesPublishedAcorn v. Household International, Inc.
211 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 2002
Data Disc, v. … Modesto City Sch., 157 F.Supp.2d at 1135 (exercising personal jurisdiction where subsidiary’s board members were directors of parent corporation); Bulova Watch Co. v. K.
Cited 32 timesPublishedNorth Coast Transp. Co. v. United States
54 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 1944
“Applications for certificates” are included in the “matters” to be referred to a joint board. … United States v. Northern Pacific R. Co., 288 U.S. 490, 494 , 53 S. Ct. 406, 407 , 77 L.Ed. 914 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedKarahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Presidio
544 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 1982
This, the DLI asserts, would defeat the purpose of the preemption of labor disputes by labor boards, which is to “shield the system from conflicting regulation of conduct.” Amalgamated Ass’n of Street, etc. v. … Case Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U.S. 332 [ 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 ].
Cited 6 timesPublishedAlvarez Ex Rel. Alvarez v. Fountainhead, Inc.
55 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, N.D. California · May 14, 1999
Ass’n. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988). The Court also considers the public interest in ruling on a motion for preliminary-injunction. See Chalk v. United States Dist. Court Cent. … Bragdon v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDees v. California State University, Hayward
33 F. Supp. 2d 1190 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 1998
And while Plaintiff sought numerous other legal remedies before the Workers Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”), the Public Employment Relations Board (“PERB”), the State Personnel Board (“SPB”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity … The “ ‘defense of laches requires unreasonable delay plus either acquiescence in the act about which plaintiff complains or prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay.’ ” Brown, 166 Cal.App.3d at 1158, 213 Cal.Rptr
Cited 2 timesPublishedSomers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
119 F. Supp. 3d 1088 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2015
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000); see generally Antonin: Scalia & Bryan A. … Congress has further required attorneys to report such evidence “to the audit committee, of the board of directors ... or to another committee of the board of directors” if “the counsel or officer does not appropriately respond
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States v. $831,160.45 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
607 F. Supp. 1407 · District Court, N.D. California · May 6, 1985
In United States v. … United States v. $4,255,625.29, 528 F.Supp. 969, 971-972 (S.D.Fla.1981); see also One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedNitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc.
100 F. Supp. 3d 851 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 2015
Defendants cite Brown v. Pacific Life Insurance, 462 F.3d 384, 389 (5th Cir.2006), in support of their argument that the second circumstance is satisfied here. … However, Brown did not apply California law and is not controlling authority. See id.
Cited 3 timesPublished331 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 2, 1970
Negre v. Larsen, 418 F.2d 908 (9th Cir. 1969). … Rabbito v. Larson, No. C-70 572 (N.D.Cal. 8/19/70). See also Goodwin v. Laird, supra; Silberberg v. Willis, 306 F.Supp. 1013, 1021 (D.Mass.1969), rev’d on other grounds, 420 F.2d 662 (1st Cir. 1970).
Cited 5 timesPublished277 F. Supp. 3d 1077 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2017
Sparling v. Daou, 411 F.3d 1006, 1013 (9th Cir. 2005). … See Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007)1 The court may consider matters that are properly the subject of judicial notice, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFishkin v. United States Civil Service Commission
309 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, N.D. California · May 19, 1969
Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Cramp v. … Bullitt, supra; Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 , 86 S.Ct. 1238 , 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, supra. 6 . See, American Communications Ass’n v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMitchell v. Peralta Community College District
766 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 1991
Sigert v. Gilley, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1789 , 114 L.Ed.2d 277 (1991); Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976). … See Price v. Akaka, 928 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir.1990). 6 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna