Case law

Marks v. San Francisco Real Estate Board

58 F.R.D. 159 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 1972

Plaintiff filed this anti-trust action against the San Francisco Real Estate Board, the Marin County Board of Realtors, and several real estate firms, all of which do business in some portion of what is described as the “ … Defendants point out that the Real Estate Boards sued herein each confines its operations to a single county, and argue that that fact is proof of the restrictions of the market.

Cleveland Macaroni Co. v. State Board of Health

256 F. 376 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1919

.” *377 It is alleged that the defendant State Board of Health threatens to proceed under the provisions of the Pure Food Law of the state (Stats. … A. 249; Arwine v. Board Medical Examiners, 151 Cal. 499 , 91 Pac. 319 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 210 U. S. 281 , 28 Sup. Ct. 616, 52 L. Ed. 1061 .

Injex Industries v. National Labor Relations Board

699 F. Supp. 1417 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 1986

Decisions of the NLRB that are made pursuant to the representation provisions of the NLRB are judicially reviewable only when the Board plainly exceeds its statutory authority (Leedom v. … “The control of the election proceeding and the determination of the steps necessary to conduct the election fairly [are] matters which Congress entrusted to the Board alone.” NLRB v.

Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization

538 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 15, 1982

The present case is distinguishable from Ogilvie v. State Board of Equalization, 657 F.2d 204 (8th Cir. 1981). There the court truly was comparing discrimination of the same type. … See, e.g., Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 511 F.Supp. 553 (N.D.Cal.1981).

Capital Cities Communications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

409 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 1976

Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 20 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1038 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123, 137 (1974); Sears Roebuck & Co. v. … Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Corp., supra, 415 U.S. at 24, 94 S.Ct. at 1040, 39 L.Ed.2d at 140 (1974). The FOIA was not enacted as a discovery device. Climax Molybdenum Co. v.

Brown v. Lieutenant Bass

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 30, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID BROWN … The Court ORDERS Defendants to file their administrative motion in C No. 23- 17 00671 JST, David Brown v.

Cross v. Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County

326 F. Supp. 634 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 17, 1968

E. g., Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 191 , 88 S.Ct. 379 , 19 L.Ed.2d 407 (1967); Reitmeister v. Reitmeister, 162 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1947). In the words of Mr. … Beauregard v. Wingard, 230 F.Supp. 167 (S.D.Cal.1964).

Brown v. Jenkins

District Court, N.D. California · May 22, 2024

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) 5 (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 318-19 (1981).

Brown v. O'Malley

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2024

Lynnmarie E. v. Saul, No. 21-cv-00244-JLB, 2021 WL 2184828, at *2 (S.D. Cal. … See Muckleshoot Tribe v. Lummi Indian Tribe, 141 F.3d 12 1355, 1358 n.4 (9th Cir. 1998) (“The court may take judicial notice of undisputed geographical 13 facts.”); see, e.g., Windom-Mattox v.

Brown v. Nguyen

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2023

Clegg v. … Keates v.

Mickle v. Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 13, 2023

Boyde v. Brown, 404 F.3d 1159, 21 1165 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Dusky, 362 U.S. at 402). … Atkins, 536 U.S. 304, 318 (2002); see also 3 Boyde v. Brown, 404 F.3d 1159, 1166–67 (9th Cir.)

Brown v. Schuyler

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2023

v. … United States v. Buenrostro, 638 F.3d 720, 725 (9th Cir. 2011) (per 24 curiam). Therefore, we reverse and remand. 25 Brown v. Atchley, 76 F.4th 862, 864, 873 (9th Cir. 2023).

Brown v. Schuyler

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2023

Brown filed the instant pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus 15 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. … Therefore, we reverse and remand. 12 Brown v. Atchley, 76 F.4th 862, 864, 873 (9th Cir. 2023).

Brown v. Nunez

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2023

Balistreri v. … See Lacey v.

Brown v. Broomfield

District Court, N.D. California · May 8, 2023

Balistreri v. … Farmer v.

Brown v. Campbell

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 2023

Rose v. … Under the procedure outlined in Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003) overruled on other grounds by Robbins v.

Johnson v. Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 7, 2022

Jackson v. 25 Roe, 425 F.3d 654, 661-62 (9th Cir. 2005). … See also Dixon v.

Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board v. Meddles

535 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 1981

On January 28,1981, the Carpenters Conference Board filed in California state court a Petition to Confirm the arbitration *777 award. … Riverboat Casino, Inc. v. Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, 578 F.2d 250, 251 (9th Cir. 1978). See also United Steelworkers of America v.

Brown v. Miller

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 27, 2023

Case No. 18-cv-07826-EMC 8 Plaintiff, FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 9 v. … Paul), the probative value of the 8 evidence is not “substantially outweighed” by the danger of unfair prejudice. 9 V.

Brown v. Retail Shoe & Textile Salesmen's Union, Local No. 410

89 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 1950

L. v. Swing, supra. … L. v. Swing, 312 U.S. 321 , 61 S.Ct. 568 , 85 L.Ed. 855 . 7 . Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 , 60 S. Ct. 736 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 ; Carlson v. California, 310 U.S. 106 , 60 S.Ct. 746 , 84 L.