Case law

Badham v. March Fong Eu

694 F. Supp. 664 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 1988

Brown, Jr., a Democrat, signed A.B. 301 into law on September 16, 1981. … On December 29, A.B. 2X, a previously-passed Board of Equalization reapportionment bill, was withdrawn from Governor Brown's desk and amended to include new congressional districts, allegedly based on the rejected A.B. 301

In re San Filippo

130 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 1955

This rule received its most recent statement in the case of Earhart v. … Humphrey v. Hart, 9 Cir., 1946, 157 F.2d 844 ; In re Skrentny, 7 Cir., 1952, 199 F.2d 488, 492 .” In the case of Humphrey v.

Yuan Jen Cuk v. Lackner

448 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 25, 1977

Jagnandan v. Giles, 538 F.2d 1166, 1182-86 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 432 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2959 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1083 (June 20, 1977); Id. at 1186-90 (Goldberg and Brown, concurring); Mauclet v. … Board of Trustees, 513 F.2d 347 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 919 , 96 S.Ct. 2623 , 49 L.Ed.2d 372 (1976), is misplaced, for in Soni the relevant state statute was much broader than that here, permitting the entity

Berman v. Resor

302 F. Supp. 1200 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1969

Bolger v. Marshall, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 30 , 193 F.2d 37 (1951); Babcock v. Koepke, 175 F.2d 923 (9th Cir. 1949). … Petitioner has not exhausted his administrative remedies in that he has not received a decision from the Board for the Correction of Military Records before which his case is currently pending. Craycroft v.

United States v. Sherebeck

27 F. Cas. 1062 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1859

It was rejected by the board for want of evidence that the land was part of the common lands of the pueblo of Yerba Buena. The same tribunal, in the subsequent case of City of San Francisco v. U. … In the case of Lanos v. U. S., the construction of this article was considered by the board of commissioners, and it was decided that it conferred upon the prefects the power of granting the common lands.

United States Ex Rel. Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.

722 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 1989

Marcus v. … Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L.Ed. 475 (1952)). In contrast, Sierra Club v.

Rollins v. Dignity Health

19 F. Supp. 3d 909 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2013

Giles v. … See Shin v. Holder, 607 F.3d 1213, 1219 (9th Cir.2010) (denying deference to Board of Immigration Appeals where its ruling was conclusory and ”lack[ed] any meaningful analysis”). . See, e.g., Letter from Gary S.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

149 F. Supp. 2d 1115 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2000

Raymond Brown 195. Raymond Brown has been employed by UPS as a full-time mechanic in Dothan, Alabama, since 1976. The issue with Mr. Brown is different from the other *1156 claimants. … Here is why: The “direct threat” clause derives from School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273, 287-88 , 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987).

Escalante v. San Francisco Community College District, and Board of Trustees

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2019

Corp. v. … Hafer v.

Hardy v. Leonard

377 F. Supp. 831 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1974

Jenkins v. United Gas Corp., 400 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1968); Cypress v. Newport News General Hospital, 375 F.2d 648 (4th Cir. 1967); Buckner v. County School Board of Greene County, 332 F.2d 452 (4th Cir. 1964). … Buckner v. County School Board of Greene County, supra, is inapposite.

Gee v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

875 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 7, 1994

The Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) dismissed plaintiffs appeal on June 6, 1991, based on plaintiffs failure to identify adequately the basis of the appeal. Administrative Record at 105. … See, e.g., Almero v. INS, 18 F.3d 757 (9th Cir.1994); Washington Public Interest Research Group v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, 11 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.1993); Imperial Irrigation District v.

Ex parte Van Laeken

81 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 5, 1948

Stapf v. Corsi, 287 U.S. 129 , 53 S.Ct. 40 , 77 L.Ed. 215 ; Volpe v. Smith, 289 U.S. 422 , 53 S.Ct. 665 , 77 L.Ed. 1298 ;. United States ex rel. Claussen v. Day, 279 U.S. 398 , 49 S.Ct. 354 , 73 L.Ed. 758 . … United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U.S. 161 , 24 S.Ct. 621 , 48 L.Ed. 917 ; United States ex rel. Loucas v. Com’r. of Immigration, D. C., 49 F.2d 473 ; Lee Fong Fook v. Wixon, supra.

Miniace v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

424 F. Supp. 2d 1168 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 2006

Schoff v. … First, Miniace owed a duty of candor to the PMA board. See Western Indus., Inc. v. General Ins.

Petersen v. Clark

285 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1968

Pavloff v. Board No. 57, Civ. No. 47407, N.D.Cal. August 3, 1967, reached the same result. … Cf., Carpenter v. Hendrix, supra; Pavloff v. Board No. 57, supra. Therefore, it is ordered that the complaint, as unamended, is dismissed with leave to amend.

Palmer v. Stassinos

348 F. Supp. 2d 1070 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 14, 2004

Palmer v. I.C. System Finally, in Palmer v. I.C. System, Palmer sets forth two causes of action against defendants I.C. System, Inc. (“IC System”), a debt collector, and B. Brown, an employee of IC System. … Board of Retirement, 209 Cal.App.3d 1528, 1532 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 106 (Cal.Ct.App.1989)); see also Mass v.

Wine

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 5, 2026

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 RECONSIDERATION MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION 10 BOARD, et al., … Delay v.

Uzun

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 2026

10 MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. … See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1406(a); 19 || Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986).

National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263 v. Commandant, Defense Language Institute

493 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 1980

To find exclusive authority for relief vested in the Board and not in private parties accords with other aspects' of the Act. See Amalgamated Utility Workers v. … Such was the authority recognized in Capital Service, Inc. v. Labor Board, 347 U.S. 501 [ 74 S.Ct. 699 , 98 L.Ed. 887 ].” Id. at 516-17 , 75 S.Ct. at 455, 456 . See also National Labor Relations Board v.

Barnum Timber Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

835 F. Supp. 2d 773 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2011

Pronsolino v. Nastri, 291 F.3d 1123 , 1134 (9th Cir.2002). … Vigil v. Leavitt, 381 F.3d 826, 833 (9th Cir.2004); Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. Clarke, 57 F.3d 1517 , 1521 (9th Cir.1995) (internal quotations omitted).

Vo

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 2026

Winter v. … Friends of the Wild Swan v.