Case law

Cross

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 3, 2024

As a result, CCCTA reviewed additional on-board audio 12 and video footage but did not hear an alarm at the time of the collision. Id. … Moreover, Brown worked for CCCTA for over 25 years where Cross had been 13 employed for less than a year. Glenn Decl., Exs Q, N; see Tyson v.

California Public Interest Research Group v. Shell Oil Co.

840 F. Supp. 712 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1993

See Student PIRG of New Jersey v. … See Western States Petroleum Association ("WSPA") v. The California Regional Quality Control Board, Civ. No. 121078. 4 .

Petersen v. Clark

289 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 1968

While the action of the board may not have been a wilful or deliberate device to prevent plaintiff from filing his Form 150, see Boswell v. … so, whether board action in classifying a registrant is tantamount to such action since in a I-A case no discretion thereafter remains in the local board, compare Brede v.

United States v. Oldenburg

762 F. Supp. 272 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 1991

Morris, Supervisory Agent, Federal Home Loan Bank Board ...,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1341 , which proscribes mail fraud. … Browne, 225 F.2d 751, 756 (7th Cir.1955); United States v. Baker, 50 F.2d 122, 123-24 (2d Cir.1931).

United States v. Biermann

678 F. Supp. 1437 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 1988

See US. v. Williams, 617 F.2d 1063, 1089-90 (5th Cir.1980). In any event, as we discuss below, Panama’s consent [to the boarding] removes international law concerns from the case. See also U.S. v. … V.

Gilmore v. United States

131 F. Supp. 581 · District Court, N.D. California · May 31, 1955

Eastland Co. v. Federal Communications Comm., 1937, 67 App. D.C. 316 , 92 F.2d 467 ; Sisto v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1949, 86 U.S.App.D. C. 31, 179 F.2d 47 ; Bowles v. … Indianapolis Railways, Inc., D.C.S.D.Ind.1946, 64 F.Supp. 865 ; See Twin Cities Milk Producers Ass’n v. McNutt, 8 Cir., 1941, 122 F.2d 564 . It is only fair to say that none of these cases involved a tripartite board.

Wickland Oil Terminals v. Asarco, Inc.

590 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 1984

Brown v. Georgeoff 562 F.Supp. 1300, 1316 (N.D. Ohio 1983). … See, e.g., United States v. Wade, 546 F.Supp. 785 -787 n. 4 (E.D.Pa.1983); United States v. NEPACCO, 579 F.Supp. 823, 833 (W.D.Mo.1984).

United States v. Mallory

305 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 3, 1969

See Wolff v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 372 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1967). The basis of their reclassification was that they had “interfered with the administration of Selective Service Board No. 85.” … Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, Cheyenne, Wyo., supra, 393 at 233, 89 S. Ct. 414 .

Steshenko v. Albee

42 F. Supp. 3d 1281 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2014

Franceschi v. Schwartz, 57 F.3d 828, 831 (9th Cir.1995) (citation omitted). The Board of Trustees is an arm of the state of California and thus the Board of Trustees may invoke the Eleventh Amendment immunity. … Courts have held that a board of trustees is not a state official acting in its official capacity and thus the Ex parte Young doctrine does not apply to a board of trustees. See, e.g., Eubank v.

San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School District

576 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 1983

See Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449, 464-65 , 99 S.Ct. 2941, 2949-50 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526, 541 , 99 S.Ct. 2971, 2981 , 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979). … The NAACP, of course, successfully prosecuted Brown v.

In Re Sagent Technology, Inc., Derivative Litig.

278 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2003

Kamen v. Kemper Fin. … Accounting Princi-pies Board, APB Opinion No. 4; see also United States v. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805 , 811 n. 7, 104 S.Ct. 1495 , 79 L.Ed.2d 826 (1984); Patrick R. Delaney, Barry J.

Kauble v. Haynes

64 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 1946

Congress has rightfully defined its policy and left to executive boards and officers the determination of facts in order to apply the law. Financial Aid Corporation v. … Christian v. Jones, 211 Ala. 161 , 100 So. 99, 100 , 32 A. L.R. 1340.

Steshenko v. Gayrard

44 F. Supp. 3d 941 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2014

Franceschi v. Schwartz, 57 F.3d 828, 831 (9th Cir.1995) (citation omitted). The Board of Trustees is an arm of the state of California and thus the Board of Trustees may invoke the Eleventh Amendment immunity. … Courts have held that a board of trustees is not a state official acting in its official capacity and thus the Ex parte Young doctrine does not apply to claims against a board of trustees. See, e.g., Eubank v.

Ex parte Gin Mun On

286 F. 752 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1920

Woo Hoo v. White, 243 Fed. 541 , 156 C. C. A. 239 . … In White v. Wong Quen Luck, 243 Fed. 547 , 156 C. C.

Smallwood v. American Trading & Transportation Co.

839 F. Supp. 1377 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1993

See Brown v. Brown, 226 Va. 320, 326-27 , 309 S.E.2d 586 (1983). But see G. Gilmore & C. … See Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Gizoni, — U.S. -, ---, -, 112 S.Ct. 486, 491-492, 494 , 116 L.Ed.2d 405 (1991). In addition, longshore workers working on board vessels on the high seas are covered by DOHSA.

Zavala v. Ridge

310 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 2004

See Marcello v. … This Court is mindful of the Supreme Court decision in Demore v.

Southwest Marine, Inc. ex rel. Universal Painting & Sandblasting Corp. v. United States

680 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 1988

The parties agree that the Board can not exercise jurisdiction over a direct appeal filed after the ninety day period. See Cosmic Construction Co. v. United States, 697 F.2d 1389 (Fed.Cir.1982). … See Glenn v.

In Re Data General Corp. Antitrust Litigation

490 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 1980

Knutson v. … Siegel v.

Terra Insurance v. New York Life Investment Management LLC

717 F. Supp. 2d 883 · District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 2010

Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 , 922 (9th Cir.2004). … Hahn v. Mirda, 147 Cal.App.4th, 740, 748 , 54 Cal. Rptr.3d 527 (2007).

Railware, Inc. v. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 10, 2026

Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of 19 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 20 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). … Ctr. for Auto Safety v.