Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.11s

  • Milton v. Commanding General

    316 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1970

    . § 673 , jurisdiction upon discharge from the Guard inhered at once in the Army, and that the application with the draft board was therefore of no effect. John Phillip Rickerts v. Maj. Gen. T. A. … Knox v. United States, 200 F.2d 398, 401-402 (9 Cir. 1952); see also Leslie Robert White v. United States, 422 F.2d 1254 (9 Cir., Mar. 4, 1970).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lewis, on Behalf of Nat. Semiconductor v. Sporck

    646 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 1986

    Contents of April 19, 1985 Demand on NSC Board The court in Greenspun v. Del E. … V. Enterprises v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 2

    107 F.R.D. 231 · District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 1985

    Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 724 F.2d 211, 217 (D.C.Cir.1984). … That too has been the position of the Board.”); see also, Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine Workers, 444 U.S. 212 , 100 S.Ct. 410 , 62 L.Ed.2d 394 (1979); Shimman v. Frank, 625 F.2d 80, 94-99 (6th Cir.1980).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Goddefroy v. The Live Yankee

    10 F. Cas. 515 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 1857

    In Brown v. Cornwall, 1 Root, CO, it was held that stock on deck jettisoned for the common safety is entitled to an average loss. … , and, if on board, will be so carried.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Canepa

    319 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 1970

    reports and floor debates on the 1967 Act show that a primary purpose of the amendments was to eliminate this local option and to provide clear, uniform standards for undergraduate deferments. 3 Breen v. … Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co., 331 U.S. 111, 116 , 67 S.Ct. 1129 , 91 *1322 L.Ed. 1375, 1382 (1947); Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U.S. 542, 552-553 , 64 S.Ct. 737 , 88 L.Ed. 917, 923 (1944).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Goodwin v. Laird

    317 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 19, 1970

    See Milton v. Commanding General, et al., 316 F.Supp. 405 (N.D.Cal., 6/4/70); Cf ., United States v. Bornemann, 424 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. … The Board’s reasons cannot properly be read as a finding of insincerity. In order to sustain a denial on the grounds of insincerity there must be a definite finding of disbelief of the petitioner. See United States v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • English & Sons, Inc. v. Straw Hat Restaurants, Inc.

    176 F. Supp. 3d 904 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 2016

    Co., Ltd. v. Fritz Companies, Inc., 210 F.3d 1099, 1102 (9th Cir.2000); see Devereaux v. … See ProtectMarriage.com v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shell Oil Co. v. Train

    415 F. Supp. 70 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 1976

    American Iron and Steel Institute v. EPA , 8 E.R.C. 1321 (3d Cir. 1975); American Meat Institute v. EPA, 526 F.2d 442 , 8 E.R.C. 1969 (7th Cir. 1975); E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company v. … American Petroleum Institute v. Train, 526 F.2d 1343 (10th Cir.). 15 . Plaintiff is entitled to challenge the Regional Board’s decision in the State Board. Cal. Water Code § 13320 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Williams v. San Francisco Unified School District

    340 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 21, 1972

    Jinks v. Mays, 332 F.Supp. 254, 256 (N.D.Ga.1971); LaFleur v. Cleveland Board of Education, 326 F.Supp. 1208, 1210 (N.D.Ohio 1971); Cohen v. Chesterfield County School Board, 326 F.Supp. 1159 (E.D.Va.1971); Guelich v. … Cleveland Board of Education, supra. In Miller v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • City of Arcadia v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    265 F. Supp. 2d 1142 · District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 2003

    Pronsolino v. … Lujan v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Railware, Inc. v. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2026

    Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 27 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 1 presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” Id. (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. … Ctr. for Auto Safety v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Child Evangelism Fellowship NorCal, Inc. v. Oakland Unified School District Board of Education

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2025

    Prince v. … See Baird v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McGinnis v. United States Postal Service

    512 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 1980

    Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … See 42 U.S.C. 2000e(j); Redmond v. GAF Corp., 574 F.2d 897 , 901 n.12 (7th Cir. 1978); Brown v. Pena, 441 F.Supp. 1382, 1384 (S.D.Fla.1977). 2 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jagla

    330 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 1970

    The courts have recognized that a local board may find a registrant insincere in his beliefs because of his demeanor. United States v. Abbott, 425 F.2d 910, 913 (8th Cir. 1970); United States v. … United States v. Corliss, supra; United States v. James, supra 417 F.2d at 832 ; United States v. Hesse, 417 F.2d 141, 144 (8th Cir. 1969); Baker v. Laird, 316 F.Supp. 1, 6 (N.D.Cal.1970); Owens v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • French Hospital Medical Center v. Shalala

    841 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1993

    The Oregon v. … Minnesota Hospital Ass'n v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sloan

    302 F. Supp. 596 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1969

    I refer first to the case of Brede v. … Likewise, we have the case of Cupit v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Young v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

    420 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 1976

    U. v. Pittsburgh, Chartiers, and Y. Ry. Co., 353 F.Supp. 1305, 1306 (W.D.Pa.1973), appeal *389 dismissed, 485 F.2d 683 (3 Cir. 1973); Barrett v. … Contending that the Board’s decision was “wholly baseless” and citing Brotherhood of Railroad Train, v. Central of Ga. Ry.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Bates

    787 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 1992

    In Stikes v. … In Cox v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Bank

    290 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 1, 1968

    Briggs v. United States, 397 F.2d 370 (9th Cir., June 26, 1968); United States ex rel. Goldstein v. McNamara, 270 F.Supp. 892, 895 (E.D.Pa.1967). The Court in deRozario v. … Goldstein v. McNamara, supra. Petitioner contends that Dr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cross

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 3, 2024

    As a result, CCCTA reviewed additional on-board audio 12 and video footage but did not hear an alarm at the time of the collision. Id. … Moreover, Brown worked for CCCTA for over 25 years where Cross had been 13 employed for less than a year. Glenn Decl., Exs Q, N; see Tyson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.