Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.11s
316 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1970
. § 673 , jurisdiction upon discharge from the Guard inhered at once in the Army, and that the application with the draft board was therefore of no effect. John Phillip Rickerts v. Maj. Gen. T. A. … Knox v. United States, 200 F.2d 398, 401-402 (9 Cir. 1952); see also Leslie Robert White v. United States, 422 F.2d 1254 (9 Cir., Mar. 4, 1970).
Cited 2 timesPublishedLewis, on Behalf of Nat. Semiconductor v. Sporck
646 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 1986
Contents of April 19, 1985 Demand on NSC Board The court in Greenspun v. Del E. … V. Enterprises v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMiller v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 2
107 F.R.D. 231 · District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 1985
Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 724 F.2d 211, 217 (D.C.Cir.1984). … That too has been the position of the Board.”); see also, Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine Workers, 444 U.S. 212 , 100 S.Ct. 410 , 62 L.Ed.2d 394 (1979); Shimman v. Frank, 625 F.2d 80, 94-99 (6th Cir.1980).
Cited 4 timesPublished10 F. Cas. 515 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 1857
In Brown v. Cornwall, 1 Root, CO, it was held that stock on deck jettisoned for the common safety is entitled to an average loss. … , and, if on board, will be so carried.
Cited 0 timesPublished319 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 1970
reports and floor debates on the 1967 Act show that a primary purpose of the amendments was to eliminate this local option and to provide clear, uniform standards for undergraduate deferments. 3 Breen v. … Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co., 331 U.S. 111, 116 , 67 S.Ct. 1129 , 91 *1322 L.Ed. 1375, 1382 (1947); Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U.S. 542, 552-553 , 64 S.Ct. 737 , 88 L.Ed. 917, 923 (1944).
Cited 1 timesPublished317 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 19, 1970
See Milton v. Commanding General, et al., 316 F.Supp. 405 (N.D.Cal., 6/4/70); Cf ., United States v. Bornemann, 424 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. … The Board’s reasons cannot properly be read as a finding of insincerity. In order to sustain a denial on the grounds of insincerity there must be a definite finding of disbelief of the petitioner. See United States v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedEnglish & Sons, Inc. v. Straw Hat Restaurants, Inc.
176 F. Supp. 3d 904 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 2016
Co., Ltd. v. Fritz Companies, Inc., 210 F.3d 1099, 1102 (9th Cir.2000); see Devereaux v. … See ProtectMarriage.com v.
Cited 7 timesPublished415 F. Supp. 70 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 1976
American Iron and Steel Institute v. EPA , 8 E.R.C. 1321 (3d Cir. 1975); American Meat Institute v. EPA, 526 F.2d 442 , 8 E.R.C. 1969 (7th Cir. 1975); E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company v. … American Petroleum Institute v. Train, 526 F.2d 1343 (10th Cir.). 15 . Plaintiff is entitled to challenge the Regional Board’s decision in the State Board. Cal. Water Code § 13320 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedWilliams v. San Francisco Unified School District
340 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 21, 1972
Jinks v. Mays, 332 F.Supp. 254, 256 (N.D.Ga.1971); LaFleur v. Cleveland Board of Education, 326 F.Supp. 1208, 1210 (N.D.Ohio 1971); Cohen v. Chesterfield County School Board, 326 F.Supp. 1159 (E.D.Va.1971); Guelich v. … Cleveland Board of Education, supra. In Miller v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedCity of Arcadia v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
265 F. Supp. 2d 1142 · District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 2003
Pronsolino v. … Lujan v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedRailware, Inc. v. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2026
Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 27 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 1 presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” Id. (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. … Ctr. for Auto Safety v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChild Evangelism Fellowship NorCal, Inc. v. Oakland Unified School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2025
Prince v. … See Baird v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcGinnis v. United States Postal Service
512 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 1980
Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … See 42 U.S.C. 2000e(j); Redmond v. GAF Corp., 574 F.2d 897 , 901 n.12 (7th Cir. 1978); Brown v. Pena, 441 F.Supp. 1382, 1384 (S.D.Fla.1977). 2 .
Cited 10 timesPublished330 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 1970
The courts have recognized that a local board may find a registrant insincere in his beliefs because of his demeanor. United States v. Abbott, 425 F.2d 910, 913 (8th Cir. 1970); United States v. … United States v. Corliss, supra; United States v. James, supra 417 F.2d at 832 ; United States v. Hesse, 417 F.2d 141, 144 (8th Cir. 1969); Baker v. Laird, 316 F.Supp. 1, 6 (N.D.Cal.1970); Owens v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFrench Hospital Medical Center v. Shalala
841 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1993
The Oregon v. … Minnesota Hospital Ass'n v.
Cited 3 timesPublished302 F. Supp. 596 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1969
I refer first to the case of Brede v. … Likewise, we have the case of Cupit v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedYoung v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
420 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 1976
U. v. Pittsburgh, Chartiers, and Y. Ry. Co., 353 F.Supp. 1305, 1306 (W.D.Pa.1973), appeal *389 dismissed, 485 F.2d 683 (3 Cir. 1973); Barrett v. … Contending that the Board’s decision was “wholly baseless” and citing Brotherhood of Railroad Train, v. Central of Ga. Ry.
Cited 3 timesPublished787 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 1992
In Stikes v. … In Cox v.
Cited 0 timesPublished290 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 1, 1968
Briggs v. United States, 397 F.2d 370 (9th Cir., June 26, 1968); United States ex rel. Goldstein v. McNamara, 270 F.Supp. 892, 895 (E.D.Pa.1967). The Court in deRozario v. … Goldstein v. McNamara, supra. Petitioner contends that Dr.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 3, 2024
As a result, CCCTA reviewed additional on-board audio 12 and video footage but did not hear an alarm at the time of the collision. Id. … Moreover, Brown worked for CCCTA for over 25 years where Cross had been 13 employed for less than a year. Glenn Decl., Exs Q, N; see Tyson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna