Case law

In Re Verisign, Inc., Derivative Litigation

531 F. Supp. 2d 1173 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2007

by the Board.” … Gompper v.

United States v. Hearst

412 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 1976

The controlling case on the question of a defendant’s standing to suppress evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search and seizure is Brown v. … Brown v. United States, supra 411 U.S. at 230 , 93 S.Ct. at 1570 , 36 L.Ed.2d at 214 .

Curtis v. Housing Authority of the City of Oakland

746 F. Supp. 989 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 1990

Specifically, HUD filed its "Response to Plaintiffs’ Memoranda in Support of Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Partial Summary Judgment” in Brown v. Housing Authority of the City of Las Vegas, No. … Contrast National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v.

Laborers' Local v. Intersil

868 F. Supp. 2d 838 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 2012

Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 811 (Del.1984) (overruled on other grounds by Brehm v. Eisner, 746 A.2d 244 (Del.2000)). … Assad v. Hart, 2012 WL 33220 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 6, 2012); Dennis v. Han, 2012 WL 33199 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 6, 2012).

Barreiro v. McGrath

108 F. Supp. 685 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 4, 1952

There is the presumption that the draft board properly discharged its duties, United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 Ü.S. 1, 47 S.€t. 1, 71 L.Ed. 131 . … The fact that it is the government making the objection is immaterial for, as stated in Industrial Addition Association v.

In re Facebook, Inc.

367 F. Supp. 3d 1108 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2019

At the time this action was filed, Facebook's Board of Directors (the "Board") had nine members. Id. ¶ 380. … Sept. 3, 2015) (quoting Rosenbloom v.

Johnson v. Decker

333 F. Supp. 88 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 1971

Brown v. Lo Duca, 307 F.Supp. 102 (E.D.Wis.1969) held squarely that § 3612 is an alternative remedy which can be pursued without the necessity of resorting to the procedure specified in § 3610. … The Court finds the thorough analysis of purpose and legislative history set out in Brown v. Lo Duca persuasive.

Southwest Marine, Inc. v. United States

680 F. Supp. 1400 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 9, 1988

See Whitey’s Welding & Fabrication, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 284 (1984). 1 The government’s motion raises two distinct questions. … See River & Offshore Services Co. v.

In re Carvajal

154 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 1957

United States v. Gredzens, D.C.Minn.1954, 125 F.Supp. 867, 871 ; United States ex rel. Rosio v. Shaughnessy, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1954, 134 F.Supp. 217 . Judge Wyzanski in a carefully considered opinion in Schenkel v. … See Ballester Pons v. United States, 1 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 899, 404-405 . . See Schenkel v. Landon, D.C.Mass.1955, 133 F.Supp. 305, 310 ; United States ex rel. Rosio v. Shaughnessy, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1954, 134 F.Supp. 217 .

Sierra Pacific Industries v. Block

643 F. Supp. 1256 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 1986

Timber sale volumes, however, are usually expressed in terms of million board feet (“MMBF”). … See EPA v.

United States v. Masaaki Kuwabara

56 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 1944

Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549 , 64 S.Ct. 346 ; Crutchfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 142 F.2d 170 ; Gutman v. United States, 9 Cir., 142 F.2d 555 ; Kiyoshi Hirabayashi v. … Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U.S. 701 , 4 S.Ct. 663, 667 , 28 L.Ed. 569 .

Hardeman v. Monsanto Co.

216 F. Supp. 3d 1037 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 2016

Brown v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470, 477 (1988). … And though California courts have since clarified that Brown extends beyond prescription drugs to include other medical products, see Hufft v.

Retired Public Employees' Ass'n v. California

614 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 13, 1984

In Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. … See Officers for Justice v.

Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Kuo

525 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 2007

On May 24, 2005, the DVS Board elected Kuo and two of her nominees to the Board. (Id) Kuo thereby gained effective control of DVS, and was appointed CEO and Chair. … Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir.1995).

Railware, Inc. v. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 28, 2026

Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 26 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 27 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)). … Ctr. for Auto Safety v.

In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation

141 F.R.D. 155 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 15, 1992

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C. 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir.1983) and Zenith Radio Corporation v.

Shell Petroleum, N v. v. Graves

570 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 1, 1983

Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … During the hearing and appeal process, the Franchise Tax Board and Board of Equalization would presumably be applying the Bank and Corporation Tax Law with the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asarco Inc. v.

Coming Up, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

830 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 1993

See Brown v. City of Berkeley, 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 236 , 129 Cal.Rptr. 1 (1976). … City & County of San Francisco v. Patterson, 202 Cal.App.3d 95, 102 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 290 (1988). Plaintiffs argue that Brown is outdated. Yet this case has been neither rejected nor “gutted.” Brown is still good law.

Highfields Capital Management L.P. v. Doe

385 F. Supp. 2d 969 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2005

Co. v. … V.

Parker v. Lester

98 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 1951

district, and a board of five Coast Guard officials to act as the national appeal board. … Thus, in the case of Yakus v.