Case law

Olivera v. AMERIACAN HOME MORTG. SERVICING, INC.

689 F. Supp. 2d 1218 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 22, 2010

Congress delegated the responsibility of developing regulations to carry out the purposes of TILA to the Federal Reserve Board ("Board"). 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (a). … In response, the Board promulgated "Regulation Z," 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 , and published its interpretation of Regulation Z in the "Official Staff Interpretation," 12 C.F.R. pt. 226 Supp. I. McCoy v.

Hillside Community Hospital of Ukiah v. Mathews

423 F. Supp. 1168 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 1976

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of the City of Durham, 393 U.S. 268, 280-281 [ 89 S.Ct. 518, 525 , 21 L.Ed.2d 474, 483 (1969)]. Mourning v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1166 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75, 82 (1965), the sale from Hillside Associates to Hillside Nonprofit may reasonably be viewed as the “furnishing” of “facilities.”

Citizens for a Better Environment-California v. Union Oil Co.

861 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 1994

See United States v. … See Klickitat County v.

Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

71 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 1974

or already on board the boat. … Crisci v. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven, Conn., 66 Cal.2d 425, 429 , 58 Cal.Rptr. 13, 16 , 426 P.2d 173, 176 (1967) (good faith and fair dealing); State Rubbish Collectors Ass’n v.

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Zhang

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2022

Fleming v. Pickard, 581 F.3d 25 922, 925 (9th Cir. 2009); Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. … Shulman, 18 Cal. 4th at 214; see also Hill v.

Florida Citrus Packers v. State of Cal.

549 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 1982

State Board of Equalization, 451 U.S. 648 , 101 S.Ct. 2070 , 68 L.Ed.2d 514 (1980); Chicago-Midwest Meat Association v. City of Evanston, 589 F.2d 278, 279 (7th Cir. 1978). … Justin & Sons, Inc. v. Brown, 519 F.Supp. 1383, 1391 (E.D.Cal.1981). Thus, an attack based upon unduly burdening commerce is limited to those situations where the product standard applies.

United States v. Masaaki Kuwabara

56 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 1944

Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549 , 64 S.Ct. 346 ; Crutchfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 142 F.2d 170 ; Gutman v. United States, 9 Cir., 142 F.2d 555 ; Kiyoshi Hirabayashi v. … Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U.S. 701 , 4 S.Ct. 663, 667 , 28 L.Ed. 569 .

Kaufman and Broad-South Bay v. Unisys Corp.

868 F. Supp. 1212 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 1994

The First Circuit recently sought to clarify the distinction between these two provisions in United Technologies v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 33 F.3d 96 (1st Cir.1994). … K & B, relying on United States v.

Affiliated Hospitals of San Francisco v. Scearce

418 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 7, 1976

Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958). … See, Latham v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111, 1116-1117 (9th Cir. 1971).

United States v. Frank

114 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 1953

As was said last week by the Supreme Court in United States v. … See also United States v. Graham, D.C.N.Y.1952, 108 F.Supp. 794, 797 .

Steshenko v. Board of Trustees of Foothill-De Anza Community College District

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 17, 2025

FILINGS 10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FOOTHILL- Re: Dkt. … See Coston v. Rahimifar, No. 1:17- 17 cv-000765-HBK, 2021 WL 736217, at *1 (Feb. 25, 2021). Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s motion to stay.

Curtis v. Housing Authority of the City of Oakland

746 F. Supp. 989 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 1990

Specifically, HUD filed its "Response to Plaintiffs’ Memoranda in Support of Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Partial Summary Judgment” in Brown v. Housing Authority of the City of Las Vegas, No. … Contrast National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v.

Steshenko v. Board of Trustees of Foothill-De Anza Community College District

District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2025

Dixon v. … See Branch v. Umphenour, 936 F.3d 994, 1004 (9th Cir. 2019) (quotations 6 omitted).

Morgan v. Laborers Pension Trust Fund for N. Cal.

433 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 1977

See Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, 421 U.S. 454, 462 , 95 S.Ct. 1716 , 44 L.Ed.2d 295 (1975); International U. of Eng. v. … Plaintiffs’ second claim for relief is that those trustees on the Board who are employee representatives breached their “duty of fair representation.” Cf. Vaca v.

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Levin Enterprises, Inc.

12 F. Supp. 3d 1208 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2013

Lee’s declaration that the Board has not taken formal action to designate any LRTC discharges under 40 C.F.R. § 122.26 (a)(l)(v). … In CalPIRG v.

American China Development Co. v. Boyd

148 F. 258 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1906

In a previous case (Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, etc., R. R. Co., 173 U. S. 1 , 19 Sup. Ct. 335, 43 L. … In the case of Rhoades v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co., 49 W. Va. 500 , 39 S. E. 209 , 55 L. R. A. 170, 87 Am. St.

United States ex rel. Faria v. Geesen

60 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 1945

Alves v. Geesen, D.C., 59 F.Supp. 726 . … Micheli v. Paullin, D.C., 45 F.Supp. 687, 689 .

Martin v. Marshall

431 F. Supp. 2d 1038 · District Court, N.D. California · May 17, 2006

V, XIV. … Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979); Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 377-78 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987).

Blodgett v. County of Santa Cruz

553 F. Supp. 1090 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 23, 1981

XI, §§ 1(a), 7; Younger v. Board of Supervisors of San Diego County, 93 Cal.App.3d 864, 869 , 155 Cal.Rptr. 921 (1979). … Plaintiffs also allege that the Board allowed false testimony to be presented at the hearing. The concept of due process is not an inflexible one. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v.

In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour Litigation

505 F. Supp. 2d 609 · District Court, N.D. California · May 29, 2007

ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … (citing Marshall v. Brown, 141 Cal.App.3d 408, 418-19 , 190 Cal.Rptr. 392 (1983)).