Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

2.35s

  • Terry v. California State Board of Pharmacy

    395 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1975

    In Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. … See Virginia Citizens Consumer Council v. State Board of Pharmacy, supra, 373 F.Supp. at 686 . IV.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Alameda Board of Supervisors

    753 F. Supp. 1508 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 28, 1990

    Defendants are the County of Alameda, its Board of Supervisors and its County Auditor. … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Milliken v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ennis-Brown Co. v. Central Pac. Ry. Co.

    228 F. 46 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 1915

    Justice McKenna, then Circuit Judge, in Southern Pacific Co. v. Goodrich (C. C.) 57 Fed. 879 , where, commenting upon Holland v. Challen and Whitehead v. … Whitehead v. Shattuck, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pavloff v. Local Board Number 57

    288 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 3, 1967

    Court enter an order restraining defendants from inducting plaintiff into the armed forces on July 12, 1967, that the Court order that plaintiff be allowed to file a form 150 which should be treated by plaintiff’s local board … subject matter of the complaint in this civil proceeding on the ground that Paragraph (8) (c) of the above-cited Act of June 30, 1967 precludes judicial review of classification or processing of any registrant by local boards

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2025

    Email: kat@siegfriedlegal.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff, ROBERT BROWN … , 8 Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 23-cv-6198-RMI 9 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. O'Malley

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2025

    Dreith v. … See Henderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 19, 2025

    Kip D. v. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 9 495 (9th Cir. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Board of Trustees v. Gudgel Yancey Roofing Inc.

    225 F. Supp. 3d 1106 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 2016

    Similarly, in Arco Electric Company v. … Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

    430 F. Supp. 426 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 22, 1977

    National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); and Virginian Ry. Co. v. … WES Chapter v. National Mediation Board, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 229 , 314 F.2d 234 (1962); Decker v. Venezolana, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 258 F.2d 153 (1958).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Boitano v. District Board, Northern Dist. No. 3

    250 F. 812 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 20, 1918

    Section 72, rule V: “On May 18, 1917, every person subject to registration had notice oí' his obligation to render military service to his country. … There was no evidence before the board at any time tending to show affirmatively that the marriage was not entered into with a primary view of evading military duty, and rule V, above quoted, seems to place upon the registrant

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bass

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2024

    Erickson v. … Albino v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Luna

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 2024

    Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007). … Ashcroft 11 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cooper v. Franchise Tax Board

    670 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1987

    In Wood v. … The Wood holding was explicitly reaffirmed in Redding Ford v. California State Board of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496 (9th Cir.1983), despite earlier dictum in Capitol questioning such a result. Id. at 1114 n. 20.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy

    393 F. Supp. 2d 999 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 7, 2005

    Accordingly, the Court denies without prejudice the Board’s claim of immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. While sovereign immunity might protect the Board from suit, see Cozzo v. … Ill, Section 3.5 precludes the Board from adjudicating such a constitutional claim. See Kenneally v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Franchise Tax Board

    661 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 1987

    . *61 Plaintiff alleges that the Franchise Tax Board improperly made a “jeopardy assessment” against him on the ground that he had unreported income from selling narcotics. … See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 , 105 S.Ct. 1938 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) (establishing one-year statute of limitations); St. Francis College v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy

    461 F. Supp. 2d 1103 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2006

    Powers and the Board from acting otherwise. Cf. Super Sack Mfg. Corp. v. … But see Green v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    511 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 1981

    This situation remained unchanged until the California Supreme Court ruled in August, 1980 in Board of Supervisors of San Diego v. … United States v. City and County of San Francisco, 310 U.S. 16, 30-31 , 60 S.Ct. 749, 756-757 , 84 L.Ed. 1050 (1940). Lathan v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 1971); Sierra Club v.

    Modified by Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860 (1983)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Google LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2022

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHASOM BROWN … See Vieste, LLC 14 v. Hill Redwood Development, No. C-09-04024 JSW (DMR), 2011 WL 588145, at *3 (N.D. Cal. 5 15 Feb. 10, 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marks v. San Francisco Real Estate Board

    69 F.R.D. 353 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 24, 1975

    Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., supra, 508 F.2d at 234-235 . … Whether the “death knell” doctrine of Cohen v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. State Board of Equalization

    450 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 1978

    Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equal, 11 Cal.2d 156 , 78 P.2d 731 (1938). Under this theory, national banks were immune from tax on sales made by them as retailers. … Cal.State Board of Equalization, Reg. 1567 (1969) (current version at Cal. Adm.Code T. 18 § 1567 (1976)). See United States v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39, 43 , 84 S.Ct. 1518 , 12 L.Ed.2d 713 (1964); Bank of America Nat.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.