Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
2.35s
Terry v. California State Board of Pharmacy
395 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1975
In Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. … See Virginia Citizens Consumer Council v. State Board of Pharmacy, supra, 373 F.Supp. at 686 . IV.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBerry v. Alameda Board of Supervisors
753 F. Supp. 1508 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 28, 1990
Defendants are the County of Alameda, its Board of Supervisors and its County Auditor. … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Milliken v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEnnis-Brown Co. v. Central Pac. Ry. Co.
228 F. 46 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 1915
Justice McKenna, then Circuit Judge, in Southern Pacific Co. v. Goodrich (C. C.) 57 Fed. 879 , where, commenting upon Holland v. Challen and Whitehead v. … Whitehead v. Shattuck, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPavloff v. Local Board Number 57
288 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 3, 1967
Court enter an order restraining defendants from inducting plaintiff into the armed forces on July 12, 1967, that the Court order that plaintiff be allowed to file a form 150 which should be treated by plaintiff’s local board … subject matter of the complaint in this civil proceeding on the ground that Paragraph (8) (c) of the above-cited Act of June 30, 1967 precludes judicial review of classification or processing of any registrant by local boards
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2025
Email: kat@siegfriedlegal.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff, ROBERT BROWN … , 8 Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 23-cv-6198-RMI 9 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2025
Dreith v. … See Henderson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 19, 2025
Kip D. v. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 9 495 (9th Cir. 2015).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Trustees v. Gudgel Yancey Roofing Inc.
225 F. Supp. 3d 1106 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 2016
Similarly, in Arco Electric Company v. … Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012).
Cited 9 timesPublishedPhilippine Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board
430 F. Supp. 426 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 22, 1977
National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); and Virginian Ry. Co. v. … WES Chapter v. National Mediation Board, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 229 , 314 F.2d 234 (1962); Decker v. Venezolana, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 258 F.2d 153 (1958).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoitano v. District Board, Northern Dist. No. 3
250 F. 812 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 20, 1918
Section 72, rule V: “On May 18, 1917, every person subject to registration had notice oí' his obligation to render military service to his country. … There was no evidence before the board at any time tending to show affirmatively that the marriage was not entered into with a primary view of evading military duty, and rule V, above quoted, seems to place upon the registrant
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2024
Erickson v. … Albino v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 2024
Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007). … Ashcroft 11 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown670 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1987
In Wood v. … The Wood holding was explicitly reaffirmed in Redding Ford v. California State Board of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496 (9th Cir.1983), despite earlier dictum in Capitol questioning such a result. Id. at 1114 n. 20.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy
393 F. Supp. 2d 999 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 7, 2005
Accordingly, the Court denies without prejudice the Board’s claim of immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. While sovereign immunity might protect the Board from suit, see Cozzo v. … Ill, Section 3.5 precludes the Board from adjudicating such a constitutional claim. See Kenneally v.
Cited 5 timesPublished661 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 1987
. *61 Plaintiff alleges that the Franchise Tax Board improperly made a “jeopardy assessment” against him on the ground that he had unreported income from selling narcotics. … See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 , 105 S.Ct. 1938 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) (establishing one-year statute of limitations); St. Francis College v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy
461 F. Supp. 2d 1103 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2006
Powers and the Board from acting otherwise. Cf. Super Sack Mfg. Corp. v. … But see Green v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedTrailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization
511 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 1981
This situation remained unchanged until the California Supreme Court ruled in August, 1980 in Board of Supervisors of San Diego v. … United States v. City and County of San Francisco, 310 U.S. 16, 30-31 , 60 S.Ct. 749, 756-757 , 84 L.Ed. 1050 (1940). Lathan v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 1971); Sierra Club v.
Modified by Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860 (1983)Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHASOM BROWN … See Vieste, LLC 14 v. Hill Redwood Development, No. C-09-04024 JSW (DMR), 2011 WL 588145, at *3 (N.D. Cal. 5 15 Feb. 10, 2011).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMarks v. San Francisco Real Estate Board
69 F.R.D. 353 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 24, 1975
Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., supra, 508 F.2d at 234-235 . … Whether the “death knell” doctrine of Cohen v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. State Board of Equalization
450 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 1978
Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equal, 11 Cal.2d 156 , 78 P.2d 731 (1938). Under this theory, national banks were immune from tax on sales made by them as retailers. … Cal.State Board of Equalization, Reg. 1567 (1969) (current version at Cal. Adm.Code T. 18 § 1567 (1976)). See United States v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39, 43 , 84 S.Ct. 1518 , 12 L.Ed.2d 713 (1964); Bank of America Nat.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna