Case law

In Re CNET Networks, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

483 F. Supp. 2d 947 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2007

Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 934 (Del.1993). … Ryan v. Gifford, 918 A.2d, 341, 358-59 .

Traweek v. City and County of San Francisco

659 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 1986

Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. … Brown, supra, and recently re-examined in Community Communications Co. v.

United States v. Niles

122 F. Supp. 382 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 1954

United States v. Henderson, 7 Cir., 180 F.2d 711 ; Richter v. United States, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 591 . … Heflin v. Sanford, supra.

Graham v. Fong Eu

403 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 19, 1976

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 729-36 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). 31 . … Williams v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra, 288 F.Supp. at 626 .

Morris v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 2024

Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Yourish v. Cal. 24 Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)). … Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 131 (9th Cir. 14 1987).

Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District

633 F. Supp. 808 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 21, 1986

Brown v. Board of Education (Brown II), 349 U.S. 294, 299-300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 755-56 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Swann v. … See Arvizu v. Waco Independent School District, 495 F.2d 499, 505 (5th Cir.1974); Bivens v. Bibb County Board of Education, 460 F.2d 430, 433 (5th Cir.1972); Haney v.

In re Intuitive Surgical Shareholder Derivative Litigation

146 F. Supp. 3d 1106 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 16, 2015

Here, given that the da Vinci system is not only Intuitive’s flagship product but is its only product, it is plausible to infer that the board knew of the da Vinci system’s development. v. … South v. Baker, 62 A.3d 1, 17 (Del.Ch.2012). In this instance,, however.

Teeter-Totter, LLC v. Palm Bay Int'l, Inc.

344 F. Supp. 3d 1100 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 2018

Palm Wine contends that the TTAB's interpretation of § 1060(a)(1) in Amazon Technologies was "flawed and improper," and that it contravenes this Court's decision in Sebastian Brown Productions, LLC v. … For example, in City of New York v.

Merrifield v. Lockyer

388 F. Supp. 2d 1051 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 1, 2005

It has come to the Board’s attention that you do not posses [sic] the proper Branch II (General Pest Control) License or Company Registration Certificate issued by the Board. … But see Powers v.

Martin v. Marshall

448 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 2006

The Board denied parole in 2004 on the basis of the same record which this court found to be insufficient. Cf. McQuillion v. … See Martin v. Marshall, 431 F.Supp.2d 1038 , 1049 n. 2 (N.D.Cal.2006) (Patel, J.). Upon reconsideration, the 2004 denial is highly material to the appropriateness of the remedy.

Hillside Community Hospital of Ukiah v. Mathews

423 F. Supp. 1168 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 1976

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of the City of Durham, 393 U.S. 268, 280-281 [ 89 S.Ct. 518, 525 , 21 L.Ed.2d 474, 483 (1969)]. Mourning v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1166 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75, 82 (1965), the sale from Hillside Associates to Hillside Nonprofit may reasonably be viewed as the “furnishing” of “facilities.”

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Zhang

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2022

Fleming v. Pickard, 581 F.3d 25 922, 925 (9th Cir. 2009); Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. … Shulman, 18 Cal. 4th at 214; see also Hill v.

Morris v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2024

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE CSU DEFENDANTS’ 10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, … Ashcroft v.

Lockary v. Kayfetz

587 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1984

Defendants cite Ocean Acres v. Dare County Board of Health, 707 F.2d 103 (4th Cir.1983), where the court rejected the continuing wrong exception in a civil rights challenge to a moratorium on septic tank installations. … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). Defendant has not cited, nor have we found, cases finding an exception to the doctrine where abuse of statutorily granted powers is alleged.

Steshenko v. Board of Trustees of Foothill-De Anza Community College District

District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2025

Dixon v. … See Branch v. Umphenour, 936 F.3d 994, 1004 (9th Cir. 2019) (quotations 6 omitted).

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Roberts

254 F.R.D. 371 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2008

Holm-gren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … Merrill Lynch & Co. v.

Kaufman and Broad-South Bay v. Unisys Corp.

868 F. Supp. 1212 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 1994

The First Circuit recently sought to clarify the distinction between these two provisions in United Technologies v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 33 F.3d 96 (1st Cir.1994). … K & B, relying on United States v.

Hartley v. Pan American Airways, Inc.

98 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1951

See Slocum v. Delaware, etc., Ry. Co., 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 ; Elgin, etc., Ry. Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L. Ed. 1886 ; Michel v. … Louisville, etc., Ry., 27 L.R.R.M. 2596 , and similar cases'which hold that determination by the Railroad Adjustment Board precludes maintenance of a suit based upon the same claim. While Moore v. Illinois Central Ry.

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

302 F. Supp. 3d 1047 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 17, 2018

Perry v. Brown , 667 F.3d at 1082 . … Perry v. Brown , 667 F.3d at 1084 .

Dooley v. The Neptune's Car

7 F. Cas. 908 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 1860

It appears that Peterson • and Brown shipped at the same time. … In Hall v.