Case law

J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.

123 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 1954

Brown v. National Electric Works, 1914, 168 Cal. 336 , 143 P. 606 ;. See— Thacker v. American Foundry, 1947, 78 Cal.App.2d 76 , 177 P.2d 322 ; Carpenter Paper Co. v. … Brown v.

Flesch v. County of Lake

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 17, 2021

According to the complaint, 13 plaintiff brings this action against Defendant Brown in his capacity as a member of the Board of 14 Supervisors. … Plaintiff argues defendant Brown 6 used his position and relationships as a member of the board of supervisors to retaliate against 7 plaintiff.5 Dkt.

Sabatino v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston

286 F. Supp. 2d 1222 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2003

McKenzie v. … In Juliano v.

In re Humboldt Lumber Manuf'rs' Ass'n

60 F. 428 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 1894

But in the recent case of The City of Norwalk, 55 Fed. 99 , Judge Brown, of the southern district of New York, reviews this question in an elaborate opinion, ⅛ which he points out that in Steamboat Co. v. … Brown v. Clegg, 63 Pa. St. 51; The Quickstep, 9 Wall. 665 ; Wooden v. Austin. 51 Barb. 9 ; Wells v. Navigation Co., 8 N. Y. 375 ; The New Philadelphia, 1 Black, 62 ; The Cayuga, 16 Wall. 177 ; Cushing v.

Hernandez v. County of Monterey

70 F. Supp. 3d 963 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2014

Brown, 732 F.3d at 955 ; Armstrong v. Wilson, 124 F.3d at 1023, 1025 ; Wilkins-Jones v. … See Coleman v. Brown, 922 F.Supp.2d 1004, 1014-15 (E.D.Cal.2013). . See Docket No. 49-13, Ex.

United States v. Alvies

112 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, N.D. California · May 28, 1953

Trainin v. Cain, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 944 , at page 948, which held that the finding of the local board was final if supported by “any evidence.” 3 . … See United States v. Zieber, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 90 , 93: « * * * Good faith and honest intention on the part of the Local Board is. not enough.

Hodges v. Hertz Corp.

351 F. Supp. 3d 1227 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2018

Cal. 2006) (taking judicial notice of San Francisco Board of Supervisors Resolutions). … In Browne v. Turner Construction Co. , 127 Cal. App. 4th 1334 , 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 433 (2005), cited by Plaintiffs, the employee of a subcontractor was injured in a fall from a ladder while working on a project.

Furumoto v. Lyman

362 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 1973

Fisk University, 443 F.2d 121 (6 Cir. 1971) (state chartering, tax exemption, power to condemn property adjacent to campus) ; Browns v. … Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 , 89 S.Ct. 266 , 21 L.Ed.2d 228 (1968) ; Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Sweezy v.

United States v. Youritan Construction Company

370 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 8, 1973

United States v. Hinds County Board of Education, 417 F.2d 852 at 858 (5th Cir. 1969). Accord: Newbern v. Lake Lorelei, Inc., 308 F.Supp. 407, 417 (S.D.Ohio 1968) (housing); United States v. … S. 547 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 , 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967) (bus terminals); Newbern v Lake Lorelei, Inc., supra (housing); Harris v. Jones, 296 F.Supp. 1082 (D. Mass.1969) (housing); Brown v.

Pronsolino v. Marcus

91 F. Supp. 2d 1337 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2000

United States v. … Board of County Commrs. v. Costie, No. 78-0572, slip op. (D.D.C. June 20, 1978) (unpublished order); see 43 Fed. *1354 Reg. 42303 (Sept. 20, 1978).

Romero v. United States

20 F. Cas. 1141 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1857

Brown swears that the Romeros have lived on the rancho since 1840, and that he always understood they had a grant. He does not pretend to have seen it. James M. … Ting-ley to be presented to the board, and that since then he has not seen it.

City of Orlando Police Pension Fund v. Page

970 F. Supp. 2d 1022 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2013

Id. at 689 ; see also Mack v. … Grimes v. Donald, 673 A.2d 1207, 1218-19 (Del.1996).

Doe v. Schachter

804 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1992

See Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d 1399 (9th Cir.1990) (procedural and substantive due process claims), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1104 , 113 L.Ed.2d 214 (1991); High Tech Gays v. Defense Ind. Sec. … See e.g., Osborn v.

Johnson v. Symantec Corp.

58 F. Supp. 2d 1107 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 1999

Browning-Ferris Industries, (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 101 , 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 60 ; Passman v. Torkan, (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 607 , 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 291 ; Hunsucker v. … See Salve Regina College v.

Thompson v. Rodriguez (In Re Rodriguez)

196 B.R. 537 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 1996

See Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 293 U.S. 328, 333 , 55 S.Ct. 151, 153-54 , 79 L.Ed. 393 (1934); Runnion v. Pedrazzini (In re Pedrazzini ), 644 F.2d 756, 758 (9th Cir.1981). … Smith v. Zak, 20 Cal.App.3d 785, 792 , 98 Cal.Rptr. 242, 246-47 (1971); Batson v. Strehlow, 68 Cal.2d 662, 675 , 68 Cal.Rptr. 589, 598-99 , 441 P.2d 101, 110-11 (1968).

United States v. Nussbaum

306 F. Supp. 66 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1969

Doss v. Lindsley, 148 F.2d 22, 23 (7th Cir.1945); Johnson et al. v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 61 F.2d 934 (2d Cir.1932); Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co., 35 F.2d 301 (4th Cir.1929); Hutchins v. Pac. Mutual Life Ins. … Jessen v. United States, 242 F.2d 213 (10th Cir.1957); DuVernay v. United States, 394 F.2d 979 (5th Cir.1968); Haven v. United States, 403 F.2d 384 (9th Cir.1968) (perhaps a dictum); United States v.

Covington v. Schwartz

230 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1964

Similarly, Beard v. … Plaintiff may obtain relief from the Army itself through a stay, pending review by the Discharge Board and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. In Anderson v.

Elam v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

220 F. Supp. 3d 996 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 14, 2016

Hill v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 814 F.2d 1192, 1195 (7th Cir. 1987); see also Singer v. … Edwards & Sons, Inc. v.

United States v. Peterson

53 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 28, 1944

The motion to dismiss is predicated on defendant’s contention that he was not permitted a personal appearance before the board. In United States v. … Counsel for the Government urges that Falbo v. United States, 64 S.Ct. 346, 349 , decided by the Supreme Court on January 3, 1944, directly covers the present case.

Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Maphia

857 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 1994

See Fisher v. Dees, 794 F.2d 432, 434-35 (9th Cir.1986); Playboy v. Frena, supra, 839 F.Supp. at 1557-58 . 16. … See Atari, Inc. v. JS & A Group, Inc., 597 F.Supp. 5, 8 (N.D.Ill.1983); c.f. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v.