Case law

Garrett v. Governing Board of Oakland Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2022

, Case No. 21-cv-03323-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. … See Zucco Partners, LLC v.

Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

58 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 1944

International Molders Union v. National Labor Relations Board, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 423 ; Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. … National War Labor Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co., supra.

Perez v. Safety-Kleen System, Inc.

253 F.R.D. 508 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 28, 2008

See Brown v. … The court reached a similar conclusion in Brown v. Federal Express Corp., 249 F.R.D. 580 (C.D.Cal.2008).

Schuman v. Microchip Tech. Inc.

302 F. Supp. 3d 1101 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2018

Brown v. Cal. Law Enforcement Ass'n, Long-Term Disability Plan , 81 F.Supp.3d 930 , 934 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (21)(A) ). … See Brown , 81 F.Supp.3d at 935 .

Baudler v. American Baptist Homes of the West

798 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 2011

the charge.’ ” McDermott v. … NLRB v.

Ex parte Hannig

106 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 1952

Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549 , 64 S.Ct. 346 , 88 L.Ed. 305 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U.S. 542 , 64 S.Ct. 737 , 88 L.Ed. 917 . … But where a registrant takes an appeal from his local .board and secures a classification from the Appeal Board, he no longer has grounds for complaint concerning the conduct of the local board. Cramer v.

Chin v. Runnels

343 F. Supp. 2d 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2004

Standing In Brown v. … Respondent further relies on Brown v.

United States v. Laier

52 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 1943

In support of its first contention the Government cites United States v. Grieme (United States v. Sadlock), 3 Cir., 128 F.2d 811, 814 . … The Government also cites Fletcher v.

County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP

836 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 27, 2011

Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir.1996) (citing 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964 (c), 1962(c)). “Racketeering activity” is any act indictable under one of several provisions of Title 18 of the United States Code. … The only case relied on by Culver, Brown v. Los Angeles, 267 Cal.App.2d 849 , 73 Cal.Rptr. 364 (Cal.App.1968) is, therefore, inapposite.

United States v. Beltran

306 F. Supp. 385 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 1969

In United States v. … United States v. Hinch, supra.

Kabede v. California State Governor's Parole Board Hearing Department

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 2020

Brown, Case No. 90-cv-00520- 26 LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal.), and Plata v. Brown, Case No. C01-1351 TEH (N.D. Cal.). … Id. at 220 (holding that the only process due during parole hearing is an 13 opportunity to be heart and a statement of reasons for the parole board’s decision); see 14 Miller v. Or.

Lopez v. Madigan

174 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 1959

See, for example, Zerbst v. … It is true that the Parole Board may not act arbitrarily or capriciously, and that a District Court may nullify a revocation which was itself a nullity. Freedman v.

United States v. Sapp

272 F. Supp. 2d 897 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2003

SFPD returned $6,409 to Brown at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco. … A second vehicle met Brown’s vehicle, and a man that agents identified as Sapp helped Brown into a white Honda and then entered the car himself.

Fong v. American Airlines, Inc.

431 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, N.D. California · May 2, 1977

v. … Braidwood, 284 F.Supp. 607, 610-611 (N.D.Ill.1968); followed in Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 423 F.Supp. 324 (D.Utah 1976); Schwarzwalder v. Public Law Board #739, C-72-1149 (N.D.Ohio 1975); Simeral v.

Candyce Martin 1999 Irrevocable Trust v. United States

822 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 2011

At this time, Helen Spalding was a member of the CPC board of directors. She had been on the board since 1994, and remained a board member until the final liquidation of CPC. Tr. 51:16-24; 694:14-23. … Ruble of Brown & Wood, a nationally recognized law firm. Brown & Wood had been engaged by Mr.

The Board of Trustees v. James Island Plastering, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 10, 2020

See Santa Monica Culinary Welfare Fund v. … Fund v.

Ekdahl v. Ayers

621 F. Supp. 2d 829 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2008

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ON ALL CLAIMS AND ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … See Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2006); Rosas v. Nielsen, 428 F.3d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam); McQuillion v.

Tietsworth v. Sears

720 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2010

In LiMandri v. … Chamberlan v.

AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

208 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2016

See, e.g., Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. … AHF relies on two cases— Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for Blind, 67 Cal.2d 536 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 21 , 432 P.2d 717 (1967) and SJCBC, LLC v.

Laborers International Union Local 261 v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 6, 2022

Ctr. v. Mink, 322 18 F.3d 1101, 1109 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting United Food & Com. Workers Union Local 751 v. 19 Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 552 (1996)). … The Board’s jurisdiction over Meyers-Milias- 13 Brown Act claims is subject to certain exceptions for “peace officers, management employees, the 14 City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles.”