Case law

Doe v. San Jose Unified School District Board

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2022

United States v. Sanmina Corp., 968 F.3d 1107, 1116 (9th 20 Cir. 2020). … Upjohn Co. v.

Washington v. San Mateo County Board of Supervisors

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2022

Ashcroft v. … See Lopez v.

Nova Wines, Inc. v. Adler Fels Winery LLC

467 F. Supp. 2d 965 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 4, 2006

(“Nova” or “plaintiff’) brought this action against defendants Adler Fels Winery LLC (“Adler Fels”), Saal Brown, Inc. dba Pacific Licensing (“Pacific Licensing”), Gary Saal (“Saal”), and Tom Kelly Studios, Inc. … Defendant Saal Brown, Inc., doing business as Pacific Licensing, is the licensing agent for TKS. Saal Dec. ¶ 2.

Variant Associates v. County of Santa Clara

317 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 5, 1970

Since the plaintiff had no right to in *890 spect the preliminary tabulations of the Santa Clara average assessment ration made by the State Board of Equalization, Web Service Co. v. … Dawson v. County of Los Angeles, 15 Cal.2d 77, 81 , 98 P.2d 495 (1940); Luce v. City of San Diego, 198 Cal. 405, 406 , 245 P. 196 (1926).

DeZure v. The American Board of Pediatrics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 1, 2021

Molski v. M.J. … Burks v. 1 1.

Ellis v. State of California Franchise Tax Board

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2021

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. 2 Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citing Papasan v. … Ashcroft v.

Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

141 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 2015

In Chung v. … [Food and Drug Admin. v.] Brown & Williamson [Tobacco Corp.], 529 U.S. [120] at 132, 120 S.Ct. 1291 [ 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) ].

Doe v. San Jose Unified School District Board

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 26, 2021

P. 10 26(c)(1) (protective order); see also Heathman v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent. … See, e.g., Associated Chino 8 Tchrs. v. Chino Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 30 Cal.

Doe v. San Jose Unified School District Board

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 13, 2021

Tele Atlas N.V. v. … (quoting Spencer v.

Transbay Const. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco

35 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1940

Salt Lake City v. Smith, 8 Cir., 104 F. 457 ; Hayden v. City of Astoria, 74 Or. 525 , 145 P. 1072 ; United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co., 253 U.S. 1 , 40 S.Ct. 423 , 64 L.Ed. 735 ; Hollerbach v. … Morgan v. Board of Education, 136 Cal. 245 , 68 P. 703 ; Contra Costa Water Co. v. Breed, 139 Cal. 432 , 73 P. 189 ; Brown v. Town of Sebastopol, 153 Cal. 704 , 96 P. 363 , 19 L.R.A.,N.S., 178; Warren Bros. Co. v.

Collins v. County of Monterey Board of Supervisors

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 20, 2020

Arbaugh v. … See Strong v.

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2026

I dismissed the complaint under Heck v. … See Rand v.

United States v. Ebay, Inc.

968 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 2013

Copperweld Corp. v. … Brown, 936 F.2d 1042, 1044-45 (9th Cir.1991) (“A market allocation agreement between two companies at the same market level is a classic per se antitrust violation.”)

Yee Gee v. City & County of San Francisco

235 F. 757 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 20, 1916

to engage therein without first securing a special permit from said board, which provisions it is claimed are in excess of the power of said board; and (2) A provision limiting and restricting the hours of the day within … And while at an earlier period the question *764 of the reasonableness of regulatory measures was deemed more largely a legislative than a judicial one (Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L Ed. 678; Munn v.

Reich v. Local 890, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

930 F. Supp. 439 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 1996

Id. at 474 , 88 S.Ct. at 650 ; see also International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 498 U.S. 466, 476 , 111 S.Ct. 880, 887 , 112 L.Ed.2d 991 (1991). … In Brock v. Intern.

Wilcox v. Ho-Wing Sit

586 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 1984

Kordich, Victor & Neufeld, 451 F.2d 838, 841 (2d Cir.1971), citing Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co., 287 F.Supp. 766, 773-75 (S.D.N.Y.1968). … See, e.g., Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1353-56 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 508 , 509, 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Bennett v.

Clements v. Alan Ritchey, Inc.

165 F. Supp. 2d 1068 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 2001

N.L.R.B. v. Stephen Dunn & Assoc., 241 F.3d 652 , 660 (9th Cir.2001) (citing Miller v. Calif. Pacific Med. Ctr., 19 F.3d 449 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc)). … (citing Senate of California v. Mosbacher, 968 F.2d 974, 977 (9th Cir.1992)).

In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

985 F. Supp. 2d 1167 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 2013

Shona Brown responded: “makes sense to do orally, i agree.” Id. … See id., Ex. 5 (Brown Depo.) at 24.

In Re VWARE, INC. STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 21, 2023

Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 930 (Del. 1993). The relevant board of directors is 13 generally comprised of those individuals serving at the time the operative complaint was filed. 14 See Braddock v. … Fund v.

I.M.A.G.E. v. Bailar

78 F.R.D. 549 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 1978

Brown, General Manager, Compensation Division, Western Region, U.S. … Brown states that there are six primary salary/wage schedules applicable within the Postal Service.