Case law

Uberti v. Sonoma County Board of Supervisors

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2020

C 19-04025 WHA 12 v. … Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 8 (1987). In his motion, plaintiff failed to plead any of these elements.

Duane v. Goodall

7 F. Cas. 1132 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 1863

Torts, p. 441; Brown v. Wheeler, 18 Conn. 199 . So, all who aid, command, advise, or countenance the commission of a tort by another, are liable as if they had done the tort with their own hands. Judson v. … Guille v. Swan, 19 Johns. 381 . “A recovery against one of several parties to a joint tort frequently precludes the plaintiff from proceeding against any other party not included in the action.”

In Re Pacific Far East Line, Inc.

314 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1970

An analogy can also be drawn from the Flotilla Doctrine as expressed in Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata OffShore Co., 377 F.2d 724, 727 (5th Cir., 1967). … Dissenting opinion of Browning, J., United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 319 F.2d 512 (9th Cir., 1963). 19 . See 48 U.S.C. § 1421 (c); Report of the Commission on the Application of Federal Laws to Guam. House Doc.

Danford v. Schwabacher

342 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 1972

In Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. … Recent cases have held, with convincing logic, that neither § 14 nor § 29 invalidates agreements of stock exchange members or agreements between dealers to arbitrate in accordance with exchange rules, Brown v.

Intel Corp. v. Via Technologies, Inc.

198 F.R.D. 525 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 11, 2000

See Beckman Industries, Inc. v. International Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 475 (9th Cir.1992); See also Kraszewski v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co., 139 F.R.D. 156, 159 (N.D.Cal.1991). In Brown Bag Software v. … Steel Corp. v.

Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2025

See Lim v. New York State Board of 5 Law Examiners, et al., No. C 25-cv-02660 HSG (ECF Nos. 1, 14, 21, 22.) … See Cato v. 3 United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995); Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 4 (5th Cir. 1988).

Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District

412 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 1, 1976

School District No. 1, 413 U.S. 189 , 93 S.Ct. 2686 , 37 L.Ed.2d 548 (1973), the Supreme Court held that *329 the desegregation mandate of Brown v. … Soria v. Oxnard School District Board of Trustees, supra; Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District, supra. C.

United States v. FMC Corporation

218 F. Supp. 817 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 1963

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, supra. The statute deals with clear-cut menaces to competition and not with ephemeral possibilities. … Handler, Annual Review of Antitrust Developments, p. 433, discussion of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U. S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 .

Atari Corp. v. Sega of America, Inc.

869 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 1994

He testified that he saw a SuperBug game “in the labs ... with boards hanging out, scopes hanging on it, and wires protruding,” but could not recall when he saw this. … Lemelson v. General Mills, 968 F.2d 1202, 1206 (Fed.Cir.1992). 1.

Steshenko v. Gayrard

70 F. Supp. 3d 979 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2014

Franceschi v. Schwartz, 57 F.3d 828, 831 (9th Cir.1995) (citation omitted). The Board of Trustees is an arm of the state of California and thus the Board of Trustees may invoke the Eleventh Amendment immunity. … California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1026 (9th Cir.1999) (same); Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir.2009) (same).

Boxer v. Accuray Inc.

906 F. Supp. 2d 1012 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 29, 2012

ORDER REMANDING ACTION SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c). Dkt. 7. … Duncan v. Stuetzle, 76 F.3d 1480, 1485 (9th Cir.1996).

Portney v. County of Lake

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 2025

Brown Act and Deliberative Process Privilege 5 California law, including the Brown Act, prohibits disclosure of proceedings of a 6 legislative body in closed session, unless authorized by that body … “The Brown Act is not a privilege recognized 13 under federal law,” and therefore does not apply in this case. N. Pacifica, LLC v. City of Pacifica, 14 274 F. Supp. 2d 1118, 1126 (N.D.

In Re Network Associates, Inc., Securities Litigation

76 F. Supp. 2d 1017 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 22, 1999

Murphy v. Welch & Brown, 187 Okla. 470 , 103 P.2d 533 (1940)...7 Switzenbaum v. Orbital Sciences Corp., 187 F.R.D. 246 (E.D.Va.1999)...29 Takeda v. … Tauzin, Hall of Texas, Towns, Rush, Brown of Ohio).

Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, LLC

70 F. Supp. 3d 951 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 9, 2014

See Casey v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 127 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 , 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 401 (2005); Malpiede v. … Co. v.

Cox v. Eichler

765 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 1990

BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Stephen Cox and Peter Molli-gan are trustees of (1) Hoberg, Finger, Brown, Cox & Molligan, a Professional Corporation Money Purchase Pension Plan and (2) Hoberg, Finger, Brown, Cox and Molligan, a Professional … Levine v.

Local 1605 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Central Contra Costa County Transit Authority

73 F. Supp. 2d 1117 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 1999

See San Francisco Fire Fighters, Local 798 v. Board of Supervisors, 3 Cal.App.4th 1482, 1489 , 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 176 (1992). … See San Francisco Fire Fighters, Local 798 v. Board of Supervisors, 3 Cal.App.4th 1482, 1491 , 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 176 (1992).

Burns v. International Insurance

709 F. Supp. 187 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 1989

The policy in Mount Hawley , however, suffered from public policy deficiencies similar to those discussed in Brown-Spaulding, infra. In Brown-Spaulding & Assocs. v. Int’l Surplus Lines Ins. … Brown-Spaulding, at 1448, 254 Cal.Rptr. 192 . The Brown-Spaulding court neither implied nor applied a notice-prejudice rule.

Hurst v. People of State of California

211 F. Supp. 387 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 1962

Hanks searched the car, and under the dashboard on the driver’s side he found one brown paper cigarette. … Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 .

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 2026

Koster v. 22 Harris, 847 F.3d 646, 656 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation modified). … amended complaint satisfies the pleading standards, citing Howard 22 v.

Smith v. Pliler

278 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2003

On Brown’s advice, Boyce told appellant that Brown was calling the police and coming with her boyfriend to pick up Boyce. … In reaction to her last remark he grabbed a knife from a cutting board in the kitchen and poked her with it. He dropped the knife, and she stumbled backwards.