Case law

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Jones

646 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1986

Cal.Civ.Code §. 4452; Brown v. Devine, 574 F.Supp. 790, 793 (N.D.Cal.1983). The court finds that Karen is Earl’s putative spouse. Cal.Civ.Code § 4401 voids “from the beginning” bigamous marriages. … Chirmside v. Board of Administration, 143 Cal.App.3d 205, 211 , 191 Cal.Rptr. 605 (1983), citing, Henn v.

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2025

Thus, Brown’s right to a meal period is not substantially dependent on analysis of a CBA, and his meal period claim is not preempted by Section 301. Johnson v. S.F. … Because none of Brown’s claims are preempted by the LMRA, Brown was not required to exhaust the CBAs’ grievance procedures as required by the LMRA. Sidhu v.

McLachlan v. Simon

31 F. Supp. 2d 731 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 1998

On March 13, 1997, a Board of Directors (“Board”) meeting was held, which was attended by all of the Trustees. … See, e.g., Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 418 (2d Cir.1961); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Levitt v.

Manzanillo v. Lewis

267 F. Supp. 3d 1261 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 2017

Brown v. Lynch, 831 F.3d 1146, 1150 (9th Cir. 2016). c. … See Flores v.

Blum v. Fleishhacker

21 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 1937

There was no secrecy in Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Downey, supra. And in Goodell v. … Franklin v. Mortgage Guaranty & Security Co. (C.C.A.) 57 F.2d. 834, 838 ; Victor Oil Co. v. Drum, 184 Cal. *535 226, 242, 193 P. 243 ; Kelley v. Boettcher (C.C.A.) 85 F. 55, 62 .

United States v. McCallum

281 F. 834 · District Court, N.D. California · May 29, 1922

Chapman v. State, 104 Cal. 690 , 38 Pac. 457 , 43 Am. St. Rep. 158 ; Reagan v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 154 U. S. 362 , 14 Sup. Ct. 1047, 38 L. Ed. 1014 . … Ed. 185 ; Scott v. Donald, 165 U. S. 58 , 17 Sup. Ct. 265, 41 L. Ed. 632 ; Hopkins v. Agricultural College, supra; Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. (May 1, 1922) 258 U.

Jones v. City and County of San Francisco

976 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 18, 1997

On September 14, 1995, a fire and safety consultant for the California Board of Corrections examined Jail No. 3, and identified 24 serious deficiencies. (Findings at 165.) … Helling v.

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 2026

Lew v. Moss, 797 F.2d 747, 749 (9th Cir. 1986). … Crum v. Circus Circus Enters., 231 12 F.3d 1129, 1131 (9th Cir. 2000).

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. General Reinsurance Corp.

111 F. Supp. 3d 1055 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 2015

California courts have reached similar conclusions when it comes to co-insurers’ interests in underlying WC Appeals Board proceedings. For 'example, in Chartis Insurance v. WC Appeals Board, 75 Cal. Comp. … Laches is “designed to promote justice by preventing surprises through the revival of claims that have been allowed to slumber until evidence has been lost, memories have faded, and witnesses have disappeared[J” Brown v.

Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. The Queen

78 F. 155 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 1896

Judge Brown, in Nesbit v. … In Hastings v.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Church

107 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 1952

Plead-rick & Brown is thus in the position of being doubly insured, Consolidated Shippers, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insur. Co., 45 Cal. … F. & G. was merely incidental to its defense of Headrick & Brown, and for its own benefit. “The decision in the case of Standard Accident Ins. Co. v.

Mendell v. The Martin White

17 F. Cas. 3 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 1856

Sherwood v. Hall [Case No. 12,777]; Steele v. Thacher [Id. 13,348]; Plummer v. Webb [Id. 11,234]; 7 D. Rep. 132. … In McGrath v.

Norian Corp. v. Stryker Corp.

252 F. Supp. 2d 945 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 2002

Atlas Powder Co. v. … At least two decisions of the Federal Circuit would be hard to reconcile, moreover, with an across-the-board corroboration rule. A dictum in Carella v.

Levin v. City & County of San Francisco

71 F. Supp. 3d 1072 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 21, 2014

Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 231-32 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003). … Horne v. USDA, 750 F.3d 1128, 1136-37 (9th Cir.2014) (citing Brown, 538 U.S. at 231-32, 235-36 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 ; and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v.

Groen v. General Foods Corp.

265 F. Supp. 793 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 1966

Brown et al. v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 23 L.Ed. 200 (1875). … The Patentees, Plaintiffs here, in distinguishing the Essipoff book from their process on appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals, could only point out that the book suggested freezing the particles in small plastic bags, while

Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc. v. East Bay Regional Park District

135 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 2001

Browning-Ferris Indus., of Ill., Inc. v. Ter Moat, 13 F.Supp. 2d 756, 778 (N.D.Ill.1998), rev’d in part on other grounds, 195 F.3d 953 (7th Cir.1999). … Co. v.

Lynch v. California Public Utilities Commission

311 B.R. 798 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 2004

In Bd. of Education v. … See SEC v.

Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.

434 F. Supp. 513 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 1977

See Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 45 U.S.L.W. 4895 , 4898-4904 (June 27, 1977); Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 1614 , 52 L.Ed.2d 155 (1977); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … Bd., supra, 542 F.2d 1076 , the court held that the First Amendment protected attempts to persuade the Board of Permit Appeals of the City and County of San Francisco (“Board”) to deny a restaurant’s applications for building

In re Yahoo! Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

153 F. Supp. 3d 1107 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 2016

See Brown v. Moll, No. C 09-05881 SI, 2010 WL 2898324 , at *1 n. 1, *4 (N.D.Cal. July 21, 2010); In re Computer *1118 Scis. Corp. Deriv. Litig., No. CV 06-05288 MRP, 2007 WL 1321715 , at *7 . n. 5 (C.D.Cal. … V.

Williams v. Alameda County Board of Supervisors

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 2023

15 ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALAMEDA COUNTY 16 BOARD … Jevons v. Inslee, No. 22-35050 (9th Cir. docketed Jan. 18, 2022); Iten v. Cnty. of Los 22 Angeles, No. 22-55480 (9th Cir. docketed May 12, 2022); El Papel, LLC v.