Case law

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 22, 2026

Balistreri v. … West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 1 B.

Smith v. Brady

744 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 1990

See, e.g., Mitchell v. Secretary of Commerce, 715 F.Supp. 409, 411 (D.D.C.1989); Brown v. Marsh, 713 F.Supp. 20, 24 (D.D.C.1989); Parker v. … Accordingly, the Court rejects the defendants’ contention that the holding of Brown v.

Natural Resources Defense Council v. McCarthy

231 F. Supp. 3d 491 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 2017

On November 13, 2015, Governor Brown suspended Section 13247 indefinitely. Exec. Order B-36-15. Id. … Section 13247 provides: State offices, departments, and boards, in carrying out activities which may affect water quality, shall comply with water quality control plans approved or adopted by the state board unless otherwise

United States v. Mitchell

572 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 1983

Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. at 672 , 102 S.Ct. at 2087 . Under Oregon v. … Topel, attorney for defendant Randy Brown, asked Burton whether Sanders had been prepared. There is a conflict in the record as to Burton’s answer. Topel claims Burton was noncommittal.

The Arakan

283 F. 861 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 17, 1922

The Homer’s equipment was used in the salving operations by her own crew, and the method of such use was the method devised by those on board the Homer, whether the operation was directed or approved by Capt. … Brown or not. While other factors assisted in salving the Arakan, she could not have been taken from her dangerous position without the aid of the Homer.

Miller ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 2

605 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 3, 1985

San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v. … See Constar, Inc. v.

Enrico's Inc. v. Rice

551 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 1982

Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350-51 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1942) to insulate Rule 100 from the application of the antitrust laws. … Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 136 Cal.App.3d 829 , 186 Cal. Rptr. 552 (1982).

Pierre Corneille

133 F. 604 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 7, 1904

In Giles v. … The language of Brown, J., in the case of The Amboy (D.

Marnell v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.

260 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 1966

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) that the antitrust laws *407 are not intended to inhibit state directed action. In Parker v. … Examples are People of State of California v. Federal Power Comm’n, supra; Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. United States, 361 U.S. 173 , 80 S.Ct. 229 , 4 L.Ed.2d 223 (1959) ; Federal Maritime Board v.

Belyea v. Cook

162 F. 180 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 1908

Burdett v. Williams (D. C.) 30 Fed. 697 ; The Topaz (D. C.) 44 Fed. 631 . 3. The libelant Charles S. Anderson asks for damages on account of alleged personal assaults, made upon him by the master, Cook. … The cause will be referred to United States Commissioner Brown, to ascertain and report the reasonable value of services of libelants Anderson, Belyea* Griffith, and the value of the services of Woodland, Bowen, Walker, and

Prado v. Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine Group Disability Income Policy

800 F. Supp. 2d 1077 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2011

Gale Brown, Jr. (“Dr. Brown”), board certified in physical medicine and rehabilitation, prepared a report dated October 8, 2009. CF 0359-0371. Dr. … See Ramos v.

Ecodyne Corp. v. Shah

718 F. Supp. 1454 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 28, 1989

Ecodyne reported this discovery to the California Regional Water Quality Board — North Coast Region (the “Regional Board”) and, pursuant to Regional Board orders, commenced investigating the chromium conditions and developing … United States v.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Byrd

710 F. Supp. 1292 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 1989

Richard Brown appeared for defendants Byrds and Eng-stroms. The sole question to be determined by the Court is whether plaintiff’s principal place of business for diversity purposes is Illinois or California. … Unger v. Del E. Webb Corp., 233 F.Supp. 713 (N.D.Cal.1964).

Stauffer v. Laird

334 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 1971

See Frisby v. Larsen, 330 F.Supp. 545 (N.D.Cal.1971); Browning v. Laird, 323 F.Supp. 661 (N. D.Cal.1969). … The Conscientious Objector Review Board’s findings constitute the official reasons for the Army’s decision, and the Army is bound by the Board’s opinion. United States ex rel. Sheldon v.

Board of Trustees of LeLand Stanford Junior University v. Modual A/C Systems, Inc.

54 F. Supp. 2d 965 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1999

See Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization, 858 F.2d 1376, 1380 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 787 , 102 L.Ed.2d 779 (1989). … See also Durfee v.

Gallardo v. Westfal-Larsen & Co. A/S

435 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 1977

Brown v. Ivarans Rederi A/S, 545 F.2d 854 (3d Cir. 1976). The Brown decision (1) cites the Kermarec standard with approval, Kermarec v. … Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd., 546 F.2d 1233 (5th Cir. 1977); Brown v. Mitsubishi Shintaku Ginko, 550 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1977); Crowshaw v. Koninklijke Nedlloyd, B.V.

In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

258 F. Supp. 3d 1037 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 2017

See Usher v. … Howard v.

The Iroquois

113 F. 964 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 1902

Shipp. & Adm. p. 81; Brown v. Overton, 1 Spr. 462 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,024; The *967 Atlantic, Abb. Adm. 451 , Fed. Cas. No. 620; Whitney v. Olsen, 47 C. C. A. 331 , 108 Fed. 292 ; Scarff v. Metcalf, 107 N. Y. 211 , 13 N. … This contention seems to be supported by the case of Peterson v. The Chandos (D. C.) 4 Fed. 645 .

Castel v. MOLLER, AP

441 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 1977

V. SCHWARZER, District Judge. Plaintiff is a longshoreman who sues the defendant vessel owner for injuries sustained while loading containers on board the vessel. … See, Restatement, Sec. 414, comment c; Munoz v. Flota Merchante Grancolombiana, S. A., 553 F.2d 837, 841 (2nd Cir. 1977); Brown v. Mitsubishi Shintaku Ginko, 550 F.2d 331, 333 (5th Cir. 1977).

Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

619 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 1985

Glass v. City of Fresno, 17 Cal.App.2d 555, 560 , 62 P.2d 765, 768 (1936); Brown v. City of Berkeley, 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231 , 129 Cal.Rptr. 1, 4-5 (1976).” … Given that the Charter is the City’s ‘constitution’, Brown, supra, 57 Cal.App.3d at 230-31 , 129 Cal.Rptr. at 4 , and is governed by the same principles, Adams v.