Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.95s

  • Brown

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 28, 2026

    Balistreri v. … See Romer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Bank Line Transport & Trading Co.

    22 F.2d 430 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 2, 1927

    The injury caused by delay may be actually shown, or may be inferred from the lapse of time itself, if this be great. 2 Foster, Federal Practice, 1815; Willard v. Wood, 164 U. S. 502 , 17 S. Ct. 176 , 41 L. … Ed. 531 ; Drees v. Waldron (C. C. A.) 218 F. 93 ; Bernays v. Frederic Leyland & Co., Ltd. (D. C.) 228 F. 913 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United Grocers, Ltd. v. United States

    186 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1960

    Crean Bros. v. C. I. R., 3 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 257 ; Commissioner v. McKay Products Corp., 3 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 639 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, 1950, 339 U.S. 583 , 70 S.Ct. 820 , 94 L.Ed. 1081 . … Plaintiff relies mainly upon Brown Shoe Co. V. Commissioner, 1950, 339 U. S. 583 , 70 S.Ct. 820 , 94 L.Ed. 1081 (see also Commissioner v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc.

    87 F. Supp. 3d 986 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 2015

    Grove v. Brown, No. 6793-VCG, 2013 WL 4041495 , at *8 (Del. Ch. Aug. 8, 2013). … Albert v. Alex. Brown. Mgmt. Servs., Inc., No. CIV. A. 762-N, 2005 WL 1594085 , *19 (Del.Ch. June 29, 2005).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Service Employees International Union v. Service Employees International Union

    230 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2002

    Workers Local 1186 v. … In United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Owens v. Commanding General

    307 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1969

    Brooks v. Clifford, 409 F.2d 700, 705-706 (4th Cir. 1969) reh. den. 412 F.2d 1137 (4 Cir. 1969); In re Kelly, 401 F.2d 211, 213 (5th Cir. 1968); Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705, 714-716 (2d Cir. 1968); Brown v. … Williams, Executive Secretary, Board for Correction of Military Records, dated September 3, 1969. 5 . See also Negre v. Larsen, 418 F.2d 908 (9th Cir. 1969). But see Morbeto v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Miller v. California Pacific Medical Center

    788 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 1992

    Brown v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co., 218 F.2d 542, 544 (9th Cir.1954). Reinstatement of CNA would serve that purpose-by returning to the status quo of the California campus prior to the merger. … Eisenberg v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Owens v. Reed

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2024

    That 12 is because of the “distinction between the institutional interests in a prison board’s disciplinary 13 decision and a guard’s accusation of wrongdoing.” Hines v. … Healthy City School 25 District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 (1977), framework to a First Amendment 26 retaliation claim).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clark v. Board of Equalization

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 17, 2023

    C 22-6173 JSC; Clark v. Medical Board of California, et al., No. C 22-6174 JSC; 1 may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. 2 § 1915A(b). … Bureau of 15 Firearms entitled to 11th Amendment immunity); Brown v. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoffman v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 38

    230 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 12, 1962

    Petitioner relies upon, and respondent Council attempts to distinguish, the clauses which were found to be unlawful in Employing Lithographers Division of Graphic Arts Employers Association, 130 N.L.R.B. 985 ; and Brown v … A more complete survey of the legislative history involved in the passage of § 8(e) of the Act can he found in Employing Lithographers of Greater Miami v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 301 F.2d 20 , and Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Shurkin v. Golden State Vintners Inc.

    471 F. Supp. 2d 998 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 2006

    Later, *1003 on March 3 and 4, 2003, GSV’s Board, including Mr. O’Neill and Mr. Brown, met to discuss GSV’s strategic options. (Id.) … In re Bank of Boston Corp., 762 F.Supp. 1525, 1531 (D.Mass.1991); see also Brown v. Sibley, 650 F.2d 760, 771 (5th Cir.1981).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

    563 F. Supp. 2d 1016 · District Court, N.D. California · May 29, 2008

    The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (“Stanford”) brought this action against Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. (collectively “Roche”), alleging infringement of various U.S. Patents. … Id.; Gasaway v. Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 26 F.3d 957, 959-60 (9th Cir.1994).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Salveson v. Western States Bankcard Ass'n

    525 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1981

    Three J Farms, Inc. v. Alton Box Board Co., supra; In re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation, 498 F.Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y.1980). … See Three J Farms, Inc. v. Alton Box Board Co., supra.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Brown v. American General Life Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 21, 2023

    Schikore v. … Yates v. Adams, No. 15 15-cv-04912-JD, 2017 WL 783520, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2017) (citing Anderson v. Liberty 16 Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Brady

    744 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 1990

    See, e.g., Mitchell v. Secretary of Commerce, 715 F.Supp. 409, 411 (D.D.C.1989); Brown v. Marsh, 713 F.Supp. 20, 24 (D.D.C.1989); Parker v. … Accordingly, the Court rejects the defendants’ contention that the holding of Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Pacific Maritime Association

    281 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 1968

    Also alleged to be in the conspiracy were Frank Brown and other union leaders. This conspiracy was designed arbitrarily to punish plaintiffs for offending the pride and dignity of Frank Brown. … Frank Brown is alleged to have the power to organize such a conspiracy because he is the brother of Archie Brown who has been a high I.L.W.U. leader. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and damages.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Berkeley Unified School Dist. of Alameda County v. James I. Barnes Const. Co.

    112 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 1953

    Snow Co. v. Commonwealth, 303 Mass. 511 , 22 N.E.2d 599 ; Wayne Crouse, Inc., v. School Dist. of Braddock, 341 Pa. 497 , 19 A.2d 843 ; Water Com’rs of Jersey City v. Brown, 32 N.J.L. 504 ; Mann v. Rochester, 29 Ind. … Furthermore, members of the city board of education are not city officers. Kelso v. Board of Education, 42 Cal.App.2d 415 , 109 P.2d 29 . See also Lansing v. Board of Education, 7 Cal.App.2d 211 , 45 P.2d 1021 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Moreno v. State of California

    25 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 1998

    Heck v. Humphrey In Heck v. … See, e.g., White v. Gittens, 121 F.3d 803, 807 (1st Cir.1997); Crow v. Penry, 102 F.3d 1086, 1087 (10th Cir.1996); Littles v. Board of Pardons and Paroles Division, 68 F.3d 122, 123 (5th Cir.1995); Zupan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Estate of Leonard Brown v. Alameda County

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2023

    For the reasons discussed at the hearing, the plaintiffs have not adequately alleged the specific role CFMG employees played in Brown’s death. … For the reasons explained in Wilkins-Jones v. County of Alameda, the ADA claim against CFMG is also dismissed. 859 F. Supp. 2d 1039, 1045-1048 (N.D. Cal. 2012); see also Abraham v. Corizon Health, Inc., 775 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marshall v. Wyman

    132 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1955

    On February 7, 1955 the board was reconvened at Ft. … Howell v. Brown, D.C., 1949, 85 F.Supp. 537 ; McCarthy v. Watt, D.C., 1950, 89 F.Supp. 841 ; Breiner v. Kniskern, D.C., 1950, 90 F.Supp. 9 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.