Case law

Munguia-Brown v. Equity Residential

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 2023

Kumho Tire Co. v. … United States v. 19 Rincon, 28 F.3d 921, 924-25 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Jordan, 924 F.

02 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power System, Inc.

399 F. Supp. 2d 1064 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 2005

Brown was created before or after MPS got access to the 02 Micro boards. Trial Tr. 1411:15-17. … Brown’s testimony as to whether the six characteristics were secret; the jury reasonably could have believed that the demo board examined by Mr. Brown was made after MPS acquired 02 Micro’s data sheet and demo board.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of California

109 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 3, 1952

Heretofore it dismissed the action against defendant Brown, Attorney General of California, and granted Civil Aeronautics Board the right to intervene and allowed it to file a complaint as such intervenor. … Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. New York State Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 767 , 67 S.Ct. 1026 , 91 L.Ed. 1234 ; Public Utilities Commission of Ohio v.

Brown v. Madison Reed, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 19, 2022

Kasky v. … Evid. 201(b); Parziale v.

Munguia-Brown v. Equity Residential

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 2021

See, e.g., Lyon v. Whisman, 45 F.3d 758, 763 (3d Cir. 1995). The 17 Court will not exercise jurisdiction over them in the class action context. See, e.g., Acri v. … Perdue v. Crocker Nat’l Bank, 38 Cal. 3d 913, 930-32 (1985); see also 15 Krzyzanowsky v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 2009 WL 481267, at *14 (N.D. Cal.

Brown v. Janus of Santa Cruz

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2021

Dec. 13, 2016) (finding an allegation that 14 defendant “engaged in a uniform policy” of wage abuse did not imply a 100% violation rate); Brown 15 v. … See Fritsch v.

Brown v. Madison Reed, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2021

It asks that Brown’s public injunctive relief 8 claim be severed to remain in this court while all her other claims go to arbitration. 9 Brown responds, relying on Hunter v. Kaiser Found. … Nguyen v.

Brown v. Western Digital Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 2021

Clark v. Hershey Co., No. C 18-06113 WHA, 2019 WL 913603, at *5 (N.D. 9 Cal. Feb. 25, 2019) (quoting Koch v. Acker, Merrall & Condit Co., 18 N.Y.3d 940, 967 10 (2012)); see also Heskiaoff v. … See, e.g., Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 136 Cal.

Gamage v. Peal

217 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 1962

Hughes v. Johnson, supra; Bershad v. Wood, supra; O’Campo v. Hardisty, supra; Preble v. Johnson, supra; Laughlin v. Rosenman, supra; Cooper v. O’Connor, supra; Lang v. Wood, 67 App.D.C. 287 , 92 F.2d 211 ; Brown v. … See also, Brown v. Rudolph, supra; Kendrick v. United States, supra.

Aerofund Holdings, Inc. v. Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 2020

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 11 LISA BASSHAM BROWN, et al., Defendants. … Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629–33 23 (1962). Accordingly, Aerofund is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not 24 recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Aerofund Holdings, Inc. v. Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 2020

No. 16. 21 In its show cause response, Aerofund states that it has reached a settlement agreement with 22 defendants Lisa Bassham Brown, MBROWN Tech Services, MBrown Tech Services, LLC, and 23 Mike Brown, and … Rather, the action must be referred to a district judge for this 5 || purpose. 28 U.S.C. § 636; Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017).

ACF Industries, Inc. v. California State Board of Equalization

653 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1986

At-chison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. Board of Equalization, 795 F.2d 1442 (9th Cir. 1986) {“Santa Fe ”). … See Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 511 F.Supp. 553, 558 (N.D.Cal.1981).

Munguia-Brown v. Equity Residential

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 9, 2020

See also 4 McCormick-Morgan, Inc. v. Teledyne Indus., Inc., 765 F. Supp. 611, 613-14 (N.D. … See Hernandez v.

United States v. Love

555 F. Supp. 1041 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 1983

. § 2241 . 1 Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 677 (9th Cir.1980). Nevertheless, defendant’s claim to presentence jail credit is cognizable under § 2255. McIntyre v. … Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 677 (9th Cir.1980).

Gomperts v. Chase

329 F. Supp. 1192 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 1971

Brown v. … United States v. Board of Education of Tulsa County, 429 F.2d 1253 (10th Cir., 1970); Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 375 F.2d 158 (10th Cir., 1967) ; Downs v.

Brown v. SF Sheriff's Dept.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AARON BROWN … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Brown v. SF Sheriff's Dept.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AARON BROWN … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Alpha Distributing Co. of California, Inc. v. Jack Daniel's Distillery, Lem Motlow Prop., Inc.

207 F. Supp. 136 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 1961

Forman, a per se antitrust combination results notwithstanding Daniel’s is a wholly owned subsidiary of Brown Forman, citing KieferStewart Co. v. … (See, Masoni v. Board of Trade, 119 Cal.App.2d 738 (1953) 260 P.2d 205 ; Restatement, Torts, Secs. 766, 767; Mallard v. Boring, 182 Cal.App.2d 390 , 6 Cal.Rptr. 171 (1960) ; Hopper v.

Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District

339 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 9, 1971

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 12 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971) ; Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300-301 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Hobson v. … Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) ; Brown v. Board of Educ., 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Hall v. St.

Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District

518 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1981

Dayton involved a school system which the Court of Appeals had found was de jure segregated at the time of the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“Brown"). … Smiley v. Vollert, supra, 453 F.Supp. at 481 . As the Supreme Court wrote in Dayton Board of Education v.