Case law

GK PROP. v. Redevelop. Agcy. of City of San Jose

409 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1976

409 F.Supp. 955 (1976) G-K PROPERTIES et al., Plaintiffs, v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the CITY OF SAN JOSE, a public body, corporate and politic, et al., Defendants. No. C-74-0721-CBR. United States District Court, N. D. … No such reports made to the Board of Directors. "(a) If no report can be attached, please describe where such reports are located.

Evanston Insurance Company v. Enterprise Plan B, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 7, 2025

Brown hired a licensed general contractor to perform 1 complete any plumbing work, however, Brown hired James Brown to perform the work. … New Hampshire v.

United States v. Cervantes

25 F. Cas. 367 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1853

De Villemont v. U. S., 12 How. [53 U. S.] 267; Glen v. U. S., 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 257. The rule as laid down in U. S. v. Kingsley, 12 Pet. [37 U. … S. v. Kingsley, ubi supra.

Arrellano

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2026

Rosalia v. City of Hayward, 2022 22 WL 420227, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2022). Generally, a parent who is also a party to the suit is 23 presumed to be a suitable guardian ad litem. Brown v. … See Bhatia v. Corrigan, 2007 WL 1455908, at *1 (N.D. Cal.

Roessert v. Health Net

929 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 1996

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983) (citing Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 , 34 S.Ct. 724 , 58 L.Ed. 1218 (1914)). … Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 25, 103 S.Ct. at 2854.

Jordan v. Paul Financial, LLC

745 F. Supp. 2d 1084 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2010

Upon its own motion or upon the request of any creditor, State or other interested party which is sub *1095 mitted in accordance with procedures prescribed in regulations of the Board, the Board shall determine whether any … In Andrews v.

In re Ripple Labs Inc. Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2023

ZAKINOV, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06753-PJH 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. … See, e.g., Brown v. 23 Brown, 2013 WL 12400041 (N.D. Cal.

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Stump & Sons, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 5, 2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOARD … See United States v.

Anderson v. Pacific Coast Co.

99 F. 109 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 1900

Bank v. Kennedy, 17 Wall. 28 , 21 L. Ed. 554 ; Maryland v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 22 Wall. 112 , 22 L. Ed. 713 ; Legal Tender Cases, 12 Wall. 548 , 20 L. Ed. 287 . … Justice Story in the case of Willard v. Dorr, 3 Mason, 161 , Fed. Cas.

Chan v. Intuit, Inc.

218 F.R.D. 659 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 2003

Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp. 960 F.2d 1465 , 1470 (9th Cir.1992) (internal quotations omitted). At least one federal court has held that patent prosecution counsel participates in competitive decision-making. … Mikohn Gaming Corp. v. Acres Gaming, Inc., 1998 WL 1059557 at *2, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22251 at *10 (D.Nev. Apr. 15, 1998).

Kramer v. Regents of the University of California

81 F. Supp. 2d 972 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 1999

Knott County Board of Educ., 941 F.2d 402, 407-08 (6th Cir.1991) (indicating that the one-year Kentucky statute of limitations for personal injury actions should apply to a Rehab Act claim); Soignier v. … See Sexton v. Otis College of Art & Design Board of Directors, No. 96-55599, 1997 WL 697294, at *1 (9th Cir.

Boreta v. Kirby

328 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 1971

Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Brown v. Town of Caliente, Nevada, 392 F.2d 546 (9th Cir. 1968); Bennett v. People of State of California, 406 F.2d 36 (9th Cir.1969). … In Selico v.

Gold v. Matson Nav. Co.

5 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 4, 1933

O’Hara v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 16 F.(2d) 681 (C. C. A. 9). The Supreme Court said in Collie v. Fergusson, 281 U. S. 52 , 50 S. Ct. 189, 191 , 74 L. … Parker v. St. Sure (C. C. A.) 53 F.(2d) 706 . Let a decree be entered in favor of respondents without costs. Order.

Lilleberg v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.

167 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 28, 1958

When plaintiff’s gang boarded the ship, the deck on which they were to work was littered with pontoons, tarps, dunnage, etc., from the previous shift of Mutual stevedores. … Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 7 Cir., 220 F.2d 939 .

In re Linklater

3 F.2d 691 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 1925

. * * * V This subdivision received an authoritative interpretation in U. S. v. Ness, 245 U. S. 319 , 38 S. Ct. 118 , 62 L. … provisions of this act shall be deemed to be unlawfully in the United States, and shall, at any time within three years thereafter, upon the warrant of the Secretary of Labor, be taken into custody and brought before a board

Lawler v. Matson Nav. Co.

108 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 1952

effective immediately; that some members of the stewards department had to work on the 11th but, by custom, the members whose home port was San Francisco did not; that they were free to go ashore; and that they all had to be on board … Warren v. United States, 340' U.S. 523, 71 S.Ct. 432 , 95 L.Ed. 503 . The most recent case on this point appears to be Hunt v.

Geo M. Martin Co. v. Alliance MacHine Systems International, LLC

634 F. Supp. 2d 1024 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 2008

Ruiz v. A.B. Chance Co., 234 F.3d 654, 667 (Fed.Cir.2000); see also Stratoflex, Inc. v. … See Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co., 227 F.3d 1361, 1379-80 (Fed.Cir.2000); Monarch Knitting Machinery Corp. v. Sulzer Morat GmbH, 139 F.3d 877, 885 (Fed.Cir.1998); Advanced Display Sys. v.

East Bay Water Co. v. McLaughlin

24 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 1938

Co. v. Public Service Commission, 262 U.S. 276 , at pages 287, 288, 43 S.Ct. 544 , at page 546, 67 L.Ed. 981 , 31 A.L.R. 807 ; McCardle v. … Again, in the later case of Des Moines Gas Co. v.

Durney v. WAVECREST LABORATORIES, LLC

441 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 2005

In Fund for Animals, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Sisneros

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 17, 2025

Sept. 25, 2025) (quoting Berrios v. N.Y. City Hous. … .”); Mansueto v. Brown, No. 25-cv- 16 01859-BAS-VET, 2025 WL 2412160, at *2 (S.D. Cal.