Case law

Wisk Aero LLC v. Archer Aviation Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2023

Upjohn v. … v.

Banks v. American Airlines Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2019

After the passengers had boarded the plane, the pilot removed Ms. … Daimler AG, 571 U.S. at 137 (quoting Goodyear 26 Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011)).

In re the Arbitration of Trustees of Operating Engineers & Participating Employers, Pre-Apprentice, Apprentice & Journeyman Affirmative Action Training Funds

303 F. Supp. 1126 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 1969

See Garvison v. Jensen, 355 F.2d 487 (9th Cir. 1965), Blassie v. Kroger Co., 345 F.2d 58 (8th Cir. 1965). … In Ware v. Adams, 53 LRRM 2290 (S.D.Calif.

Kellman v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc.

313 F. Supp. 3d 1031 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 12, 2018

Doe v. … v.

Fred. Olsen & Co. v. Moore

162 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 1958

Olsen & Co., as shipowner, and others, seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on board the S.S. Bonanza while the vessel was in dock in the Port of Oakland in San Francisco Bay. … Ayers v. Watson, 113 U.S. 594 , 5 S.Ct. 641 , 28 L.Ed. 1093 ; Martin’s Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 151 U.S. 673 , 14 S.Ct. 533 , 38 L.Ed. 311 ; Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio R.

Spreckels v. The State of California

45 F. 647 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1890

Justice Bradley in The Justice v. … The Bolivar v. The Chalmette, ubi supra.

Sims v. Diaz

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2020

Atascadero State Hosp. v. 7 Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 237-38 (1985). Eleventh Amendment immunity also extends to suits against 8 an arm of the state, such as the CDCR and prisons within the CDCR. See Brown v. Cal. … Rand v.

Havens v. Leong P'ship

586 B.R. 760 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 2018

Relying on Law v. … In In re Synergistic Technologies, Inc. , a board member of a company, that was no longer in operation, defended against an involuntary petition brought by two other board members.

Clark v. California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection

212 F. Supp. 3d 808 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 19, 2016

Gov’t Code §§ 3250, et seq., before the State Personnel Board in an attempt to regain his lost earnings. Id. ¶ 13. On November 20 and 21, 2014, the Personnel Board heard Plaintiffs administrative complaint. Id. ¶ 14. … Will v.

Mott v. MacMahon

214 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 1963

In United States v. … In Torras v.

Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. Kilkeary

102 F. Supp. 999 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 1952

Because of the flood a state of emergency was declared by the Board of Supervisors of Yuba County, lasting from November 20, 1950, to December 11, 1950. … Co., 1893, 147 U.S. 370, 374 , 13 S.Ct. 348 , 37 L.Ed. 206 ; Chamberlin v. Browning, 1900, 177 U.S. 605, 608-609 , 20 S.Ct. 820 , 44 L.Ed. 906 .

Vallejos v. Barber

146 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 1956

Barber v. Gonzales, 1954, 347 U.S. 637 , 74 S.Ct. 822 , 98 L.Ed. 10C9. … Shung v. Brownell, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 25 , 227 F.2d 40 .

Young v. Schultz

District Court, N.D. California · May 8, 2023

Young was still on the Board of Directors. … Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1996)). 13 Plaintiffs allege that Schultz committed two acts of extortion between March 2021 and October 14 12, 2022, working with other members of the HOA.

Jeanese, Inc. v. United States

227 F. Supp. 304 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1964

See: Coughlin v. Blair, 1953, 41 Cal.2d 587, 599 , 262 P.2d 305 ; Freedman v. The Rector, 1951, 37 Cal.2d 16, 23 , 230 P.2d 629 , 31 A.L.R.2d 1 ; Smissaert v. Chiodo, 1958, 163 Cal. … Sherman v.

Gardner v. City of Berkeley

838 F. Supp. 2d 910 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 17, 2012

Janken v. GM Hughes Elecs., 46 Cal.App.4th 55, 63 , 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 741 (1996); see also Reno v. Baird, 18 Cal.4th 640, 645-46 , 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 499 , 957 P.2d 1333 (1998); Roby v. … a person from retirement upon (a) his or her application to the board for reinstatement and (b) the determination of the board that his or her age at the date of application for reinstatement is at least six months less

Valtierra v. Housing Authority of City of San Jose

313 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 1970

Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969)), have long been entertained under § 1983. … Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 668 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966). Both bear a far heavier burden of justification than other classifications. See, McLaughlin v.

Doe by and Through Doe v. Petaluma City School Dist.

949 F. Supp. 1415 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 1996

The Eleventh Circuit, in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 74 F.3d 1186 (11th Cir.1996), took a different approach. … The Davis court found the extension of Title VTI’s substantive standards appropriate in light of the Supreme Court’s mandate that Title IX be read broadly, North Haven Board of Education v.

United States v. Alhaggagi

372 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 2019

Brown, Punishing Terrorists: Congress, the Sentencing Commission, the Guidelines, and the Courts , 23 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 517 , 520 (2014). … See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553 ; Brown at 521 ("answer" to problems with sentencing enhancement is "to affirm the discretion of trial judges to modify the enhancement's application in individual cases."); United States v.

Kiva Health Brands LLC v. Kiva Brands Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2020

Eat Right Foods Ltd. v. … Id. at *3 (quoting In re Morgan Brown, 119 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1350, at *1).

United States v. Holtz

54 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 10, 1944

Schneiderman v. United States, supra; Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9 , 34 S.Ct. 10 , 58 L.Ed. 101 ; United States v. Ovens, 4 Cir., 13 F.2d 376 ; United States v. Plaistow, D.C., 189 F. 1006 ; United States v. … Pohlmann, who boarded at the defendants’ boarding-house from 1930 to 1942 testified that he saw Herman Schwinn, the Gauleiter of the Bund of Los Angeles, eating meals at the boarding-house in 1933 or 1934.