Case law

Museum of Handcar Technology LLC v. Transportation Agency for Monterey County

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2025

by retaliation and “the alleged statements by other Board supervisors indicate a motivation that is not retaliatory.”); Neal v. … Chamber of Com. v. Council for Educ. & Rsch. on Toxics, 29 F.4th 468, 482 (9th 7 Cir. 2022) (quoting Brown v. Cal.

Echague v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

69 F. Supp. 3d 990 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 24, 2014

Secalt S.A. v. Wuxi Shenxi Const. Mach. Co., Ltd, 668 F.3d 677, 689 (9th Cir.2012) (citation omitted); Oster v. Std. Ins. … As explained by Hummell v. S.E.

Henderson v. United States

231 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 1964

Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 ; Smith v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708 , 81 S.Ct. 895 , 6 L.Ed.2d 39 ; and United States v. Glass, 4 Cir., 317 F.2d 200 , supra). … In United States v.

Bagley v. United States

77 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 1948

The English case of Tin die v. … The respondents in Brown v.

In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation

253 F.R.D. 478 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 18, 2008

The chip can then be mounted on a computer board to form a graphics board. … In Deiter v.

Associated Engineers, Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance

175 F. Supp. 352 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 4, 1959

on December 6, but plaintiff did not learn the extent of the damage until February 20, on which date testing was completed according to the daily field reports furnished by plaintiff and the construction diaries kept by Brown … Abrams v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co., supra; Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity Exchange, 1955, 5 Cal.2d 81 , 53 P.2d 155 . Each case must depend on its own facts. Abrams, supra; Gibson v.

United States v. Buckley

31 F. 804 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 2, 1887

S. v. Bain. … S. v. King.

Vitale v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 9, 2024

Erickson v. … Ashcroft v.

Board of Trustees for the Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. P & J Utility Company

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 2022

Duarte v. Freeland, No. 05-cv-2780-EMC, 2008 WL 683427, at *1 (N.D. Cal. 15 Mar. 7, 2008) (quoting Watts v. Crawford, 10 Cal. 4th 743, 749 n.5 (1995)). … Code § 415.50(a)(1); 7 Hernandez v. Srija, Inc., No. 19-1813-LB, 2019 WL 4417589, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2019); 8 Cummings v. Brantley Hale, No. 15-cv-4723-JCS, 2016 WL 4762208, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Fitzgerald v. Procunier

393 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 1975

Clutchette v. Procunier, 9 Cir., 510 F.2d 613 . … Hence, the complaint is dismissed as to defendants Kerr, Gordon, Hoover, Wood, Garcia, Quevedo, Lynum and Brown for failure to state a cause of action.

Wallman v. Tower Air, Inc.

189 F.R.D. 566 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 1999

Lohrenz v. Donnelly, 187 F.R.D. 1, 8 (D.D.C. 1999). … Laxalt v. McClatchy, 809 F.2d 885, 888 (D.C.Cir.1987).

Cator v. Herrgott & Wilson, Inc.

609 F. Supp. 12 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 12, 1984

In Tomlin v. … However, in Alessi v.

Meagher v. United States

170 F. Supp. 2d 960 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2001

See id. at 822 ; [5] Williams v. … In Reed v.

Ramirez v. United Airlines, Inc.

416 F. Supp. 2d 792 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 2005

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). … “The actual aircraft which plaintiff boarded in Los Angeles had ‘MEXICANA’ painted in large letters on the fuselage” (Opp. 2; see also Flaherty Decl. ¶ 7).

In re Delgado

57 F. Supp. 460 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 11, 1944

See Brown, Boatswain’s Mate, v. Cain, D.C., 56 F.Supp. 56 .

In re Empire Finance Corp.

1 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 1932

See 4 Foster, Federal Practice, 3820; 6 Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, 359; Board of Commissioners of Boise County v. Gorman, 86 U. S. (19 Wall.) 681 , 22 L. Ed. 226 . … Jennings v. Carson, 4 Cranch, 2 , 2 L. Ed. 531 ; Grant v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co., 121 U. S. 118 , 7 S. Ct. 849 , 30 L. Ed. 909 .

Klein v. Landon

487 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, N.D. California · May 29, 2007

The complaint named nominal defendant Mercury and nine former board members and officers of Mercury. … Gupta v. Boston, Case No. C 05-4685 JF (PVT); Casey v. Landan, Case No. C 05-4690 JF (PVT); Selig v. Landan, C 05-4703 JF (PVT); and City of New Orleans Employees’ Retirement System v. Boston, Case No.

Johnson v. Smith

630 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 1986

See Tameny v. … Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 13 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2848 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). See, e.g., Smith v.

Charles Schwab & Co. v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

861 F. Supp. 2d 1063 · District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 2012

Third, at its discretion, the FINRA Board may review the NAC’s decision. Compl. ¶ 17; FINRA Rules 9349, 9351. … Mathews v.

Helton v. Factor 5, Inc.

26 F. Supp. 3d 913 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2014

.”); Hertz v. … See Boucher v.