Case law

California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. S/T NORFOLK

435 F. Supp. 1039 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 1977

There she was boarded, a customs inspection was conducted and the boarding party departed at 2315 hours. … See, e. g., United States v. S. S.

United States v. Peralta

27 F. Cas. 495 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1863

S. v. Alviso, 23 How. [64 U. S.] 318. … My opinion is that the decree of the board rejecting the claim should be affirmed.

Doe v. Carleson

356 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 1973

Carleson v. Taylor, 404 U.S. 980 , 92 S.Ct. 446 , 30 L.Ed.2d 364 (1971). … Saddler v. Winstead, 332 F.Supp. 130 (NJD.Miss.1971).

Henderson v. United States

231 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 1964

Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 ; Smith v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708 , 81 S.Ct. 895 , 6 L.Ed.2d 39 ; and United States v. Glass, 4 Cir., 317 F.2d 200 , supra). … In United States v.

In re Ezeta

62 F. 972 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 22, 1894

board. … C. 707; Reg. v. Solway, Cox, Cr. Cas. 235; State v. Calhoun, 72 Iowa, 432 , 34 N. W. 194 ; Clements v. State, 84 Ga. 660 , 11 S. E. 505 .

Llewellyn v. San Mateo County

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2025

A city or county may not be held vicariously liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under the theory of respondeat superior, see Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

In re Pinterest Derivative Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 16, 2022

Dec. 22, 4 2008) (Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong) (crediting a $15.8 million benefit). … Staton v. Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 26 938, 968 (9th Cir. 2003).

Terones v. Pacific States Steel Corp.

526 F. Supp. 1350 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 20, 1981

Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1978). But cf. Boase v. … Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union v. Ratner Corp., 602 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1979); and Lix v. Edwards, 82 Cal.App.3d 573 , 147 Cal.Rptr. 294 (1978).

Wang v. Zymergen Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 29, 2022

Brown v. Google LLC, 525 F. Supp. 3d 1049, 1060 (N.D. Cal. 2021). reasonable investor about the nature of his or her investment. … Second, Zymergen’s former CEO, Josh Hoffman, stepped down as CEO and as a member of the Board, presumably because of these failures. Id. ¶ 114.

Painters Union Local No. 127 v. District Council of Painters

278 F. Supp. 830 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 1968

Compare Brooks v. Local No. 30, etc., 187 F.Supp. 365 (E.D.Pa.1960). … But see Brooks v.

In Re Moralez

400 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 3, 1975

Brown, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. OPINION ORRICK, District Judge. … Such determination shall be under the supervision and control of the court." [3] The Courts in United States v. National Furniture Co., 348 F.2d 390 (8th Cir. 1965) and William H. Wise & Co. v.

In re Smith-Rice No. 4

323 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1968

In Thompson v. … Swanson v. Marra Bros., Inc., 328 U.S. 1 , 66 S.Ct. 869 , 90 L.Ed. 1045 (1946). In other words, decedents must be on board the vessel primarily to aid her in navigation. Puget Sound Freight Lines v.

Swearingen v. Yucatan Foods, L.P.

59 F. Supp. 3d 961 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2014

characterizing properties of the ingredient in question; (2) the method of production of this ingredient; and (3) the difference between this ingredient and other sweeteners made from sugar cane, e.g., molasses, raw sugar, brown … Syntek Semiconductor Co. v. Microchip Tech., Inc., 307 F.3d 775, 782 (9th Cir.2002) (amended); Astiana v.

Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States

106 F. Supp. 1022 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 1952

In 1932 the Supreme Court decided Matson Navigation Co. v. United States, 284 U. … See also: Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 280 U.S. 320 , 50 S.Ct. 118 , 74 L.Ed. 451 ; Unit *1023 ed States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v.

Citizens for a Better Environment v. Deukmejian

731 F. Supp. 1448 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 5, 1990

(d) Consumer solvents: adoption by the District or Air Resources Board by June 1, 1990. 28 Counsel for plaintiffs, the District, and the Air Resources Board, are to meet and confer within 20 days of September 19, 1989, to … NRDC v.

Graybill-Bundgard v. Standard Insurance

793 F. Supp. 2d 1117 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 2011

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. On October 20, 2010, Plaintiff Rachel Graybill-Bundgard filed a complaint in *1119 San Francisco County Superior Court. … Plute v. Roadway Package Sys., 141 F.Supp.2d 1005, 1008 (N.D.Cal.2001); see also Ritchey v.

Price v. Chen

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2023

See Brown v. Cal. Dep't of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (California 14 Department of Corrections and California Board of Prison Terms entitled to 11th Amendment 15 immunity). … Douglas v. Cal. Dept. of Youth Authority, 271 F.3d 812, 821 n.6 (9th Cir. 7 2001); In re Lazar, 237 F.3d 967, 976 n.9 (9th Cir. 2001).

Edd King v. National General Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 2024

Defendants move to strike the Brown Declaration under Daubert v. … City of Sacramento v. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys., 22 Cal. 22 App. 4th 786, 795 (1994) (quoting County of Sutter v. Board of Administration, 215 Cal. App. 3d 23 1288, 1295 (1989)).

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jasper

883 F. Supp. 2d 915 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 2010

Rudy-Glanzer v. … See, e.g., SEC v.

Nada Pacific Corp. v. Power Eng'g & Mfg., Ltd.

73 F. Supp. 3d 1206 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 2014

Both reports were available to Nada prior to the Dispute Review Board proceeding discussed below. Id. III. … the dispute to a Dispute Review Board (“DRB”).