Case law

Siguenza v. CDCR

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 2024

Ashcroft v. … Rhodes v.

Aeroground, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

170 F. Supp. 2d 950 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 9, 2001

Indeed, the RLA status of Aeroground is currently being evaluated by the National Mediation Board. … Connecticut Board of Labor Relations, 1974 WL 1266 , at *3 (D.Conn.1974).

Southern Pac. Co. v. Defense Supplies Corporation

64 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 21, 1946

Co. v. United States, 93 U.S. 442 , 23 L. Ed. 965 ; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. United States, 15 Ct.Cl. 126 ; Act of June 7, 1924, c. 291, 10 U.S.C.A. § 1375 ; Powell v. … United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 9 Cir., 282 F. 950 ; United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Delaware Co., Pa., 3 Cir., 17 F.2d 40 ; United States v.

General Insurance Co. of America v. City of Belvedere

582 F. Supp. 88 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 1984

Browne v. McDonald Douglas Corp., 504 F.Supp. 514, 518 (N.D.Cal.1980); Cable v. Sahara Tahoe Corp., 93 Cal.App.3d 384, 395 , 155 Cal.Rptr. 770, 777 (1979). … Crane v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 5 Cal.3d 112 , 95 Cal.Rptr. 513 , 485 P.2d 1129 (1971); Arenson v. National Auto and Casualty Insurance Company, 45 Cal.2d 81 , 286 P.2d 816 (1955); City of Mill Valley v.

CelLink Corp. v. Manaflex LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 17, 2025

Ashcroft v. … Coakley and Brown’s contributions “relate to specific systems [and 14 methods] claimed in each of the [Manaflex] Patents . . . .” Regents of Univ. of California v.

Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Company

165 F. Supp. 2d 1059 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2001

See Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for S. California, 463 U.S. 1, 22 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … See Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 22 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 .

Singh v. Jutla & C.D. & R's Oil, Inc.

214 F. Supp. 2d 1056 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2002

See Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556, 561 (9th Cir.1987). II. Pre-Hoffman Law Defendants contend that under Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. … See Snapp v.

United States v. Harts

131 F. 886 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 30, 1904

United States v. One Pearl Necklace (D. C.) 105 Fed. 359 . … United States v. Dominici et al., 78 Fed. 334 , 24 C. C. A. 116 .

Crown MacHine & Tool Co. v. K v P-Sutherland Paper Co.

297 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 1968

V. INFRINGEMENT A. … Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Ruby Lighting Corp., 191 F.2d 521 (9th Cir.1951); Park-In Theatres v. Perkins, 190 F.2d 137 (9th Cir.1950).

McLeod v. 1,600 Tons of Nitrate of Soda

55 F. 528 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 1893

Randall v. Lynch, 2 Camp. 352; Leer v. Yates, 3 Taunt. 387; Barker v. Hodgson, 3 Maule & S. 267; Bessev v. Evans, 4 Camp. 131; Barret v. Dutton, Id. 333; Thiis v. Byers, 1 Q. B. Div. 244; Straker v. Kidd, 3 Q. B. … In Dow v.

American Small Business League v. United States Office of Management and Budget

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2021

Brown.” Compl. ¶ 28, Ex. M 5 (Request No. … P. 21; 3 Coughlin v.

Cervantes v. United States

5 F. Cas. 380 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1855

S. v. Ritchie [Id. 525]. … S. v. Clarke, 8 Pet. [33 U.

Valadez v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.

298 F. Supp. 3d 1254 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 2018

Similarly, in Brown v. Am. … Fund v. Brown , 32 Cal.

Glen v. Hongisto

438 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1977

Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 573 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1737 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); cf. City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 429 U.S. 167 , 97 S.Ct. 421 , 50 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976). … The advertisement here in question simply urged the Board of Supervisors to negotiate by engaging in collective bargaining.

In re California Nav. & Imp. Co.

110 F. 678 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1901

several passengers drowned, it is only necessary to say that the evidence fails to show that the heirs of such deceased persons have sustained any pecuniary loss by reason of their death; and upon the authority of Burk v. … The Spaulding, 1 Brown, Adm. 310 , Fed. Cas. No. 13,215.

Jefferson v. City of Fremont

73 F. Supp. 3d 1133 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2014

Commis. of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Taylor v.

Wolfe v. National Lead Company

156 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 1957

Lawrence-Williams Co. v. Societe Enfants Gombault, 6 Cir., 1931, 52 F.2d 774, 778 ; see also Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 1916, 240 U.S. 251, 259 , 36 S.Ct. 269 , 60 L.Ed. 629 . … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., supra 240 U.S. at pages 261-262, 36 S.Ct. at pages 272-273, quoting from Graham v. Plate, 1871, 40 Cal. 593, 598 .

Connell Bros. v. Sevenseas Trading & Steamship Co.

111 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 1953

any such vessel, by reason or by means of any fire happening to or. on board the vessel, unless such fire is caused by the design or neglect of such owner.” … Charbonnier v. United States, D. C., 45 F.2d 166, 170 ; Hoskyn & Co. v. Silver Line (The Silvercypress), 2 Cir., 143 F.2d 462 .

City & County of San Francisco v. United States

82 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 1948

This motion was denied on the authority of the case of Pacific Spruce Corporation v. City and County of San Francisco, 9 Cir., 72 F.2d 712 . … The contract between the plaintiff and the State Board of Harbor Commissioners for the construction and maintenance of the Third Street Bridge was admitted by the defendant as having been duly executed.

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Lakeside Heights Homeowners Ass'n

110 F. Supp. 3d 965 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 18, 2015

It cites to McCarthy v. R.J. … Co. v.