Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.19s

  • Builders Corporation of America v. United States

    148 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 19, 1957

    Masoni v. Board of Trade, 119 Cal.App.2d 738 , 260 P.2d 205 . … Anglo-American & Overseas Corp. v. United States, supra; Social Security Admin. Baltimore F.C.U. v. United States, supra; Mid-Central Fish Co. v. United States, supra; and Routh v. Quinn, supra.

    Reversed by Builders Corporation of America, a Corporation, and Herlong Sierra Homes, Inc., a Corporation v. United States, 259 F.2d 766 (1958)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen v. Meese

    616 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 28, 1985

    Securities Industry Ass’n v. Board of Governors, — U.S. —, —, 104 S.Ct. 2979, 2983 , 82 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984); see also Tulalip Tribes of Washington v. … In Kessler v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. McCoy v. California Medical Review, Inc.

    90 Daily Journal DAR 14240 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1990

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). See also Rushford v. … EEOC v. Erection Co., 900 F.2d 168 (9th Cir.1990); Valley Broadcasting Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 798 F.2d 1289 , 1292 (9th Cir.1986).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Granados v. Monterey County Jail

    District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 2023

    Balistreri v. … See 27 Monell v. Dep't of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978). A city or county may not be held 1 superior. Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tenants & Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

    406 F. Supp. 1024 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 1970

    See Urbain v. Knapp Bros. Mfg. Co., 217 F.2d 810, 815 (6th Cir. 1954); United States v. Onan, 190 F.2d 1, 7 (8th Cir. 1951); Western Addition Community Organization v. … Said defendants shall refer, to a board of arbitration of three persons (chosen as hereinafter provided) for final decision by that board, each case in which, promptly after any offer of specific relocation or promptly after

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Woodard v. Mayberg

    242 F. Supp. 2d 695 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2003

    People v. … Wolff v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jefferson v. City of Fremont

    73 F. Supp. 3d 1133 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2014

    Commis. of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Taylor v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • American Small Business League v. United States Office of Management and Budget

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2021

    Brown.” Compl. ¶ 28, Ex. M 5 (Request No. … P. 21; 3 Coughlin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wright v. United States

    700 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 1988

    After the coxswain was sure the eductor was running smoothly, he maneuvered CG-41367 close to AXIS so that his engineer could board her and identify the source of the flooding. … Daley v. United States, 499 F.Supp. 1005, 1009 (D.Mass.1980); Shupe v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sharma v. Reno

    902 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1995

    See Rendleman v. … Correa v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sanfilippo v. County of Santa Cruz

    415 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 1976

    The County ordinance specifically exempts from the 30-day limit review of the types of governmental action listed in California Government Code § 65907, which includes the decisions of zoning boards and of boards of appeal … Brock & Sons, Inc. v. City of Davis, 401 F.Supp. 354 (N.D.Cal.1975); Dahl v. City of Palo Alto, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Greer v. Erickson

    16 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 1936

    A book form savings bank comprising a case formed with slots in the sides thereof, a covering for said case simulating the binding of a book, stiffening boards for said cover, and tongues stamped from the body of each board … Deitel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. $191,910 in U.S. Currency

    772 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 1991

    In Terry v. … We note that Morgan repeatedly emphasized that he was ultimately “cleared” for boarding.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Doe Ex Rel. Lavery v. Attorney General of the United States

    814 F. Supp. 844 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1992

    See Carter v. Casa Cent., 849 F.2d 1048, 1056 (7th Cir.1988). School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 287 n. 16, 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 1131 n. 16, 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987). … Leckelt v. Board of Comm’rs of Hosp. Dist. No. 1, 909 F.2d at 827-830 . 9.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Patricia H. v. Berkeley Unified School District

    830 F. Supp. 1288 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 1993

    Brown University, 991 F.2d 888 (1st Cir.1993), and sex discrimination in school admissions, see Can *1290 non v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 , 99 S.Ct. 1946 , 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). … Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Board of Oil & Gas Conservation, 792 F.2d 782, 787-88 (9th Cir.1986) (citations omitted).

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Miller v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Treasury (In Re Miller)

    284 B.R. 121 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 2, 2002

    Rein v. Providian Financial Corp., 270 F.3d 895, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001). … V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Bankruptcy Court’s decision is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. BMW of North America, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 11, 2019

    Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 13-cv-05205-YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *3 21 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2014). … See Oppo. 8-9. 1 convenience of the parties.”4 Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 YGR, 2014 2 WL 715082, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2014).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Bryson

    16 F.R.D. 477 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 1953

    a motion to dismiss, a motion to compel election* and a motion for a bill of particulars in relation to an indictment which charges that the defendant “in a matter within the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board … American Tobacco Co. v. U. S., 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 93 ; Hughes v. U. S., 6 Cir., 114 F.2d 285 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fowler v. California Toll-Bridge Authority

    46 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1941

    The Authority consists of a board of five members, all state officials, acting without compensation. … In the case of State Highway Commission in Arkansas v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Holland v. Norwegian Cruise Lines

    765 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1990

    See, e.g., Spataro v. Kloster Cruise, Ltd., 894 F.2d 44, 45-46 (2d Cir.1990). Whether the notice to passengers was reasonably adequate is a question of law. Nash v. … See, e.g., Keefe v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.