Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.19s
Builders Corporation of America v. United States
148 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 19, 1957
Masoni v. Board of Trade, 119 Cal.App.2d 738 , 260 P.2d 205 . … Anglo-American & Overseas Corp. v. United States, supra; Social Security Admin. Baltimore F.C.U. v. United States, supra; Mid-Central Fish Co. v. United States, supra; and Routh v. Quinn, supra.
Reversed by Builders Corporation of America, a Corporation, and Herlong Sierra Homes, Inc., a Corporation v. United States, 259 F.2d 766 (1958)Cited 14 timesPublishedInternational Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen v. Meese
616 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 28, 1985
Securities Industry Ass’n v. Board of Governors, — U.S. —, —, 104 S.Ct. 2979, 2983 , 82 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984); see also Tulalip Tribes of Washington v. … In Kessler v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. McCoy v. California Medical Review, Inc.
90 Daily Journal DAR 14240 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1990
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). See also Rushford v. … EEOC v. Erection Co., 900 F.2d 168 (9th Cir.1990); Valley Broadcasting Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 798 F.2d 1289 , 1292 (9th Cir.1986).
Cited 6 timesPublishedGranados v. Monterey County Jail
District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 2023
Balistreri v. … See 27 Monell v. Dep't of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978). A city or county may not be held 1 superior. Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).
Cited 0 timesUnknown406 F. Supp. 1024 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 1970
See Urbain v. Knapp Bros. Mfg. Co., 217 F.2d 810, 815 (6th Cir. 1954); United States v. Onan, 190 F.2d 1, 7 (8th Cir. 1951); Western Addition Community Organization v. … Said defendants shall refer, to a board of arbitration of three persons (chosen as hereinafter provided) for final decision by that board, each case in which, promptly after any offer of specific relocation or promptly after
Cited 9 timesPublished242 F. Supp. 2d 695 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2003
People v. … Wolff v.
Cited 4 timesPublished73 F. Supp. 3d 1133 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2014
Commis. of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Taylor v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAmerican Small Business League v. United States Office of Management and Budget
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2021
Brown.” Compl. ¶ 28, Ex. M 5 (Request No. … P. 21; 3 Coughlin v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown700 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 1988
After the coxswain was sure the eductor was running smoothly, he maneuvered CG-41367 close to AXIS so that his engineer could board her and identify the source of the flooding. … Daley v. United States, 499 F.Supp. 1005, 1009 (D.Mass.1980); Shupe v.
Cited 4 timesPublished902 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1995
See Rendleman v. … Correa v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSanfilippo v. County of Santa Cruz
415 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 1976
The County ordinance specifically exempts from the 30-day limit review of the types of governmental action listed in California Government Code § 65907, which includes the decisions of zoning boards and of boards of appeal … Brock & Sons, Inc. v. City of Davis, 401 F.Supp. 354 (N.D.Cal.1975); Dahl v. City of Palo Alto, supra.
Cited 8 timesPublished16 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 1936
A book form savings bank comprising a case formed with slots in the sides thereof, a covering for said case simulating the binding of a book, stiffening boards for said cover, and tongues stamped from the body of each board … Deitel v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. $191,910 in U.S. Currency
772 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 1991
In Terry v. … We note that Morgan repeatedly emphasized that he was ultimately “cleared” for boarding.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDoe Ex Rel. Lavery v. Attorney General of the United States
814 F. Supp. 844 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1992
See Carter v. Casa Cent., 849 F.2d 1048, 1056 (7th Cir.1988). School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 287 n. 16, 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 1131 n. 16, 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987). … Leckelt v. Board of Comm’rs of Hosp. Dist. No. 1, 909 F.2d at 827-830 . 9.
Cited 5 timesPublishedPatricia H. v. Berkeley Unified School District
830 F. Supp. 1288 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 1993
Brown University, 991 F.2d 888 (1st Cir.1993), and sex discrimination in school admissions, see Can *1290 non v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 , 99 S.Ct. 1946 , 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). … Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Board of Oil & Gas Conservation, 792 F.2d 782, 787-88 (9th Cir.1986) (citations omitted).
Cited 41 timesPublishedMiller v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Treasury (In Re Miller)
284 B.R. 121 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 2, 2002
Rein v. Providian Financial Corp., 270 F.3d 895, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001). … V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Bankruptcy Court’s decision is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedMartinez v. BMW of North America, LLC
District Court, N.D. California · Dec 11, 2019
Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 13-cv-05205-YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *3 21 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2014). … See Oppo. 8-9. 1 convenience of the parties.”4 Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 YGR, 2014 2 WL 715082, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2014).
Cited 0 timesUnknown16 F.R.D. 477 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 1953
a motion to dismiss, a motion to compel election* and a motion for a bill of particulars in relation to an indictment which charges that the defendant “in a matter within the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board … American Tobacco Co. v. U. S., 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 93 ; Hughes v. U. S., 6 Cir., 114 F.2d 285 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedFowler v. California Toll-Bridge Authority
46 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1941
The Authority consists of a board of five members, all state officials, acting without compensation. … In the case of State Highway Commission in Arkansas v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHolland v. Norwegian Cruise Lines
765 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1990
See, e.g., Spataro v. Kloster Cruise, Ltd., 894 F.2d 44, 45-46 (2d Cir.1990). Whether the notice to passengers was reasonably adequate is a question of law. Nash v. … See, e.g., Keefe v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna