Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.11s

  • Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co., Inc.

    365 F. Supp. 235 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 17, 1972

    United States v. … And in Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co., 512 F.2d 1264 (1975)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Santa Cruz Underground and Paving, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 2022

    Brown Decl. (dkt. 38-1) Ex. 1 at ECF p. 157; id. … Brown Decl. Ex. 1 at ECF pp. 6–7; id. Ex. 2 at ECF pp. 200–01.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oden v. Reed

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 13, 2024

    Hines v. … Wood v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Company

    165 F. Supp. 2d 1059 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2001

    See Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for S. California, 463 U.S. 1, 22 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … See Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 22 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, et al. v. JML Engineering & Construction, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 1, 2024

    Dkt. 1 ¶ 7; see Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). JML was served with process on March 15, 2023. Dkt. 9. … Dkt. 1 § V, ¶ 1.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Free Kick Master LLC v. Apple Inc.

    140 F. Supp. 3d 975 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2015

    See Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir.2007). … Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa Int’l Serv.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Renfrew v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (In Re Western Asbestos Co.)

    416 B.R. 670 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 2009

    Brown described the process for submitting claims to the Trust, and attached as an exhibit a copy of the claim form that claimants are required to utilize. Brown Decl., Exh. 1. … Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior Court, 15 Cal.3d 652, 656 , 125 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 542 P.2d 977 (Cal.1975); Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini, 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 678 , 156 Cal.Rptr. 55 (Cal.Ct.App.1979).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sluimer v. Verity, Inc.

    628 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2008

    or any committee duly authorized by the Board to administer the *1107 Plan. … The Board may at any time administer the Plan, in whole or in part, notwithstanding that the Board has previously appointed a committee to act as the Plan Administrator. Kanter Decl. at ex. A, § 2(Z).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Capillo v. Bristol Packing Co.

    112 F. 439 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 1901

    “When a mariner contracts for a particular service or duty on board a vessel, he engages both for fidelity in the performance of that duty, and for that capacity and those qualities which will enable him to perform the service … Sherwood v. McIntosh, Ware, 109, Fed. Cas. No. 12,778. And in Curt. Merch. Seam. p. 149, it is ¿aid: '.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cryan v. Wardell

    263 F. 248 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1920

    City of Oakland v. Albers Bros.’ Milling Co. (Cal. App.) 184 Pac. 868 . … This conclusion is not affected by the principles stated in Board of Education v. Grant, 118 Cal. 39 , 50 Pac. 5 , or San Francisco v. McGinn, 67 Cal. 110 , 7 Pac. 187 , relied on by defendant.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Biederman v. FCA US LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 2024

    See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 16 919 (2011). … Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *4 11 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maceri

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2026

    (quoting Brown v. Kijakazi, 11 F.4th 1008, 1010 (9th Cir. 2021). She also 19 characterizes her position as implicating the doctrine of law of the case. … In Brown, an ALJ had determined 8 that the plaintiff was disabled and entitled to benefits as of April 25, 2018, but not before that date. 9 Brown v. Kijakazi, 11 F.4th 1008, 1009 (9th Cir. 2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • County of Santa Clara v. Astra United States, Inc.

    428 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2006

    City of S.F. v. PG & E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115 , 1127 (9th Cir.2006) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). California caselaw is in accord. Most directly on point is Santa Monica Rent Control Board v. Bluvshtein, 230 Cal. … See, e.g., People v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Schendel v. Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Pension Plan

    880 F. Supp. 710 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 16, 1995

    On appeal, the Board of Trustees confirmed denial of the 6.5 service credits, informing Mr. … Although not raised by the Plan Administrator or the Board of Trustees, defendants also now assert Mr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pennington v. US Assure Insurance Services of Florida, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 2025

    on Brown’s website. … Khoja v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ex parte Dong Ming

    20 F.2d 388 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 1927

    United States v. Tod (C. C. A.) 296 F. 345 . There should have been a specific finding relating to the birth certificate. United States ex rel. Schachter v. Curran (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 356 . … See Johnson v. Damon (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 65 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Webkinz Antitrust Litigation

    695 F. Supp. 2d 987 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2010

    Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Second, the market must encompass the product at issue as well as all economic substitutes for the product. Id. … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.

    591 F. Supp. 2d 1038 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2006

    Karp Presents a Licensing and Litigation Strategy to the Board 46. On March 4, 1998, Karp presented the licensing strategy to the Rambus Board of Directors. HTX 031. … See, e.g., Carlucci v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 645 F.3d 1336 (2011)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Granados v. Monterey County Jail

    District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 2023

    Balistreri v. … See 27 Monell v. Dep't of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978). A city or county may not be held 1 superior. Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parravano v. Babbitt

    861 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 1994

    Mattz v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.