Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
2.00s
564 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, N.D. California · May 19, 1983
Bell v. Wolfish, supra. … While state law can create liberty interests, Olim v. Waklnekona, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1741 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983), as well as property interests, Board of Regents v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedIn Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation
126 F. Supp. 2d 1248 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2000
Case Co. v. … In Novak v.
Cited 119 timesPublishedLeDuc v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance
814 F. Supp. 820 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 1992
In Group Life & Health Ins. v. … Similarly in Cochran v.
Cited 111 timesPublished540 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 1982
As the Supreme Court held in Storer v. … In Cross v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCellNet Data Systems, Inc. v. Itron, Inc.
17 F. Supp. 2d 1100 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1998
Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1582 (Fed.Cir.1996); and Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir.1991). … See Uniroyal, Inc. v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedCote D'Azur Homeowners Ass'n v. Venture Corp.
846 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 1994
Corp. v. … Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWeinfurther v. Source Services Corp. Employees Profit Sharing Plan & Trust
759 F. Supp. 599 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 1991
Clark v. Lauren Young Tire Center Profit Sharing Trust, 816 F.2d 480 (9th Cir.1987); Lojek v. Thomas, 716 F.2d 675 (9th Cir.1983). B. … In August 1986, the Board of Directors amended the plan to change the definition of “competition.”
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople of State of California v. the Jules Fribourg
140 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 29, 1956
Bramble v. Culmer, 4 Cir., 1897, 78 F. 497 . 3 . For cases discussing the effect of a pilotage clause, similar to the present one, upon the rights of third parties see: Publicker Industries v. … Finsen, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1931, 52 F.2d 795 ; Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v.
Cited 21 timesPublished875 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 2012
Browne, 611 F.Supp.2d at 1067-68 . … (citations omitted) Hagberg, 32 Cal.4th at 367 , 7 Cal.Rptr.3d 803 , 81 P.3d 244 ; see also, Brown v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedChaganti v. 12 Phone International, Inc.
635 F. Supp. 2d 1065 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2007
Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York, 42 F.3d 135, 140 (2d Cir.1994); Prescott v. United States, 973 F.2d 696, 701 (9th Cir.1992). … Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEvans v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC
252 F. Supp. 3d 855 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2017
See, e.g., Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp., 34 Cal.4th 979, 990 , 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 352 , 102 P.3d 268 (2004) (elements of fraud); Lloyd v. Gen. … Moreland v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 152 Md.App. 288 , 831 A.2d 1091, 1096 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2003) (citing Doe v. Archdiocese of Wash., 114 Md.App. 169 , 689 A.2d 634, 641-43 (Md. Ct. Spec.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 2021
Five of those actions were: Ludmila Gulkarov, et al. v. Plum, PBC and Plum, Inc. 17 (Case No. 4:21-CV-913-YGR); Vanessa Mathiesen v. Plum, PBC (Case No. 4:21-CV-1763- 18 YGR); Cindy Pereira v. … No. 66.) 27 2 Brown v. Plum, PBC (Case No. 21-4953-YGR), was filed on June 28, 2021, after the 1 pending. (Dkt.
Cited 0 timesUnknown57 F. Supp. 3d 1176 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 25, 2014
Samuel Brown on November 7, 2011. Id. ¶ 27. Dr. Brown diagnosed Ms. Ludovico with “sprain/strain, upper arm, back, strained shoulder, trapezius muscle.” Id. Eventually, Dr. Brown placed Ms. … Brown returned Plaintiff to work without any restriction. Ludovico Decl. ¶ 31; Docket No. 71, at 27 (Dr.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · May 21, 2024
M. v. Cty. of San Mateo, 2020 WL 3251175, at 16 *2 (N.D. Cal. … “Without civil rights 25 litigants who are willing to test the boundaries of our laws, we would not have made much of the 26 progress that has occurred in this nation since [Brown v. Board of Education].”
Cited 0 timesUnknownHell's Angels Motorcycle Corp. v. County of Monterey
89 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2000
Davis v. … In Reisman v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 13, 2021
In Swarthout v. … Thornton v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown333 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 1971
THE BURGETT CLAIMS Burgett v. Texas, supra, held that prior convictions which had been obtained in violation of Gideon v. … See also Harrington v.
Cited 3 timesPublished153 F. Supp. 3d 1094 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 29, 2015
In Balasanyan v. … Finally, in Gonzalez v.
Cited 4 timesPublished196 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 1961
Counsel for the plaintiff relies on Grillea v. … Supp. 125 , 1958 A.M.C. 2304 ; Blankenship v. Ellerman’s Wilson Line, 4 Cir., 1959, 265 F.2d 455 , 1960 A.M.C. 2454 ; and Billeci v. United States, D.C.N.D. Cal.S.D.1960, 185 F.Supp. 711 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedZilk v. Deaton Fountain Service
257 F. Supp. 458 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1966
In Brooks Walker v. … Ex. 0-2), Brown Patent (Def. Ex. M), Miller Patent (Ex. 0-7) (Carter and Miller patents non-cited). . The Great Atl. & Pac.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna