Case law

In Re Juniper Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation

542 F. Supp. 2d 1037 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2008

V. … Munoz v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 950, 957 (9th Cir.2003) (citing Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350, 363 , 111 S.Ct. 2773 , 115 L.Ed.2d 321 (1991)). 5 .See Stoneridge Inv. Partners, LLC v.

Adams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2025

Brown 3 Defendants move to sever Plaintiff Brown from this action. … Fox Test Prep v. Facebook, Inc., 588 F.

United States v. Lim Jew

192 F. 644 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1910

See, also, Delaware, etc., Co. v. Kutter, 147 Fed. 51, 59 , 77 C. C. A. 315 ; De Sollar v. Hanscome, 158 U. S. 216 , 15 Sup. Ct. 816, 39 L. … “The board is an instrument of the executive power, not a court.

Kirkham v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

78 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 1947

San Francisco Lodge No. 68 v. Forrestal, D.C., 58 F.Supp. 466 ; Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. Munch, 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 85 ; National War Labor Board v. … Alameda v. Paraffine Cos., D.C., 75 F.Supp. 282 , and cases therein cited. Johnson v. Park City Consol. Mines Co., D.C., 73 F.Supp. 852 ; Ditto *659 v. American Aluminum Co., D.C., 73 F. Supp. 955 .

New Education Development Systems, Inc. v. Boitano

573 F. Supp. 594 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1983

See England v. … See Jewish Reconstruction Synagogue v.

McGraw v. States S. S. Co.

116 F. Supp. 446 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 1953

The cause of action arises out of an illness suffered by libel-ant while on board respondent’s vessel on a voyage to the Far East. … Johnson v. Andrus, 6 Cir., 119 F.2d 287 ; Blake v. W. R. Chamberlin & Co., 9 Cir., 176 F.2d 511 ; Sitchon v. American Export Lines, 2 Cir., 113 F.2d 830 .

Henrique v. United States Marshal

476 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 26, 1979

Castillo v. United States, 391 F.2d 710, 711 (2nd Cir. 1968); Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 811 , 318, 388 F.2d 567, 574 (D.C.Cir.1967); Rossello v. … United States Board of Parole, 261 F.Supp. 308, 310 (M.D.Pa.1966).

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Locke

771 F. Supp. 2d 1203 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2011

Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562, 566 (9th Cir.1995). Defendants cite U.S. v. … The Ninth Circuit has emphasized that block billing “does not justify an across-the-board reduction or rejection of all hours” in a fee application. Mendez v.

Green v. March Fong Eu

540 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 1982

As the Supreme Court held in Storer v. … In Cross v.

In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation

126 F. Supp. 2d 1248 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2000

Case Co. v. … In Novak v.

Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. Pillsbury

37 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 1941

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lawson, 5 Cir., 94 F.2d 190, 192 . In South Chicago Co. v. … See De Wald v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 4 Cir., 71 F.2d 810 ; Diomede v. Lowe, 2 Cir., 87 F.2d 296 ; Moore Dry Dock Co. v. Pillsbury, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 245 .”

Rees v. United States

134 F. 146 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1904

Personal property of the United States on board of a vessel for transportation from one port to'another is liable to a lien for salvage services rendered in saving it. The Davis, 10 Wall. 15 , 19 L. Ed. 875 . … Lewis v. A Lot of Whalebone (D. C.) 51 Fed. 916 ; The Colima, 5 Sawy. 181 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,996.

Williams v. Peralta Community College Dist.

227 F.R.D. 538 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 28, 2005

See Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2001). As noted above, the Court *541 has no factual basis here to make such a determination. II. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Ms. … See Colombrito v.

Daniels v. Alameda County

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2019

Awabdy v. … Dillard does not plausibly support an inference 12 that the Alameda County Board of Supervisors or Alameda County caused the District Attorney’s 13 Office to bring charges two weeks later—two months before the Brown

Guillory v. Contra Costa County

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2025

Swift v. 8 California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Anderson v. Boyd, 714 F.2d at 909; see 9 also Thornton v. Brown, 724 F.3d 1255, 1259 (9th Cir. 2013); see also Chavez v. … “This immunity applies even where parole officers ‘impos[e] 11 allegedly unconstitutional parole conditions.’” ” Chavez v. Robinson, 12 F.4th at 997 (citing 12 Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 839–40).

Ex parte Mota Singh Chohan

122 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 1954

Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 , 74 S.Ct. 499 . Mastrapasqua v. … Matranga v.

Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. New York Life Insurance

513 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1978

Thus, in Oleet v. … For example, in Kirby v. P.R.

Husain v. Olympic Airways

116 F. Supp. 2d 1121 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 3, 2000

See Warshaw v. … V.

CellNet Data Systems, Inc. v. Itron, Inc.

17 F. Supp. 2d 1100 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1998

Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1582 (Fed.Cir.1996); and Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir.1991). … See Uniroyal, Inc. v.

Johansen v. County of Napa

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2021

Board of the County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997). … Adickes v. S.H.