Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.18s

  • Mwasi v. Taira

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 2022

    Ashcroft v. … Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Preiser, 411 1 Plaintiff challenges his 2020 denial of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Frisby v. Larsen

    330 F. Supp. 545 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 4, 1971

    Jackson v. Godwin, 400 F.2d 529 (3 Cir. 1968) ; Pierce v. LaVallee, 293 F.2d 233 (Cir. 1961); Gilmore v. Lynch, 326 F. Supp. 330 (N.D.Cal. April 1, 1971). . Estep v. … United States v. Hesse, 417 F.2d 141, 143 (8 Cir. 1969), citing United States v. Corliss, 280 F.2d 808, 814 (2 Cir. 1960). . Helwick v. Laird, 438 F.2d 959, 963 (5 Cir. 1971). . Shirer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Maddox v. County of San Mateo

    746 F. Supp. 947 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1990

    British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 950-52 (9th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1790 , 60 L.Ed.2d 241 (1979). … Assn. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Marc Cohodes v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2025

    Rosenfeld v. U.S. DOJ, 904 F. Supp. 2d 988, 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (citing Brown v. 24 Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492, 497 (9th Cir. 1990)). … C 19 || Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coastwise Line v. United States

    157 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1957

    National Water Carriers Association v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1954, 126 F.Supp. 87 ; Carlsen v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1952, 107 F.Supp. 398 ; Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. … Kiser Co. v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., D.C.S.D.Ga.1916, 236 F. 573 , affirmed 5 Cir., 1917, 239 F. 718 ; see Board of Railroad Commissioners of State of North Dakota v. Great Northern Ry.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Fong Chow Oi

    15 F.2d 209 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 21, 1926

    Petitioner, claiming to be entitled to admission as a returning native-born citizen of the United States, bearing form 430, was denied admission after hearings before a board of special inquiry, on the ground of failure to … If the case of United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 253 , 25 S. Ct. 644 , 49 L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Minton v. Deloitte and Touche USA LLP Plan

    631 F. Supp. 2d 1213 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 2009

    Nisenfeld, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, for review. Dr. … In Fair v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Payne v. Mertens

    343 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 1972

    See Brown v. Town of Caliente, 392 F.2d 546 (9 Cir. 1968); Sires v. Coles, 320 F.2d 877 (9 Cir. 1963). Therefore the section 1983 claim must be dismissed as to the defendant City of Palo Alto. … In that case appellants argued: “The Monroe [Monroe v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.

    452 F. Supp. 2d 924 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2006

    Todd v. Exxon Corp., 275 F.3d 191, 201-02 (2d Cir.2001). “Congress prescribed a pragmatic, factual approach to the definition of the relevant market and not a formal, legalistic one.” Brown Shoe Co. v. … Barrett v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.

    897 F. Supp. 2d 939 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 21, 2012

    Keystone Driller Co. v. … See Qualcomm Incorporated v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Emporium Capwell Co. v. Anglim

    48 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 1943

    There were meetings of the stockholders of both companies and two-thirds of the stockholders approved the merger, and the board of directors of the companies also approved. In Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., v. … In Weil v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp.

    374 F. Supp. 2d 825 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 2005

    VAX 750 processor and an “Excelan” networking board. … In the Sandberg reference, the Excelan board processes such lower-level layers of the NFS protocol stack. See Sandberg at 10410 (stating the Exce-lan board “handles Ethernet, IP, and UDP requests”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ellis v. NAVAL AIR REWORK FACILITY, ALAMEDA, CAL.

    404 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 3, 1975

    Title VII gives a plaintiff thirty days to file in district court after notice of final agency or final appeal board action. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c). … Jackson v. Klassen, et al., C-73-1068 (N.D.Cal. Nov. 19, 1974) (Williams, J); Brown v . Froelke, et at, C-73-0251 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 25, 1974) (Wollenberg, J); Thompson v. Department of Justice, 372 F.Supp. 762 (N.D.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Breed

    58 F.R.D. 101 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 17, 1973

    Pierre v. United States, 319 U.S. 41, 42 , 63 S.Ct. 910 , 87 L.Ed. 1199 (1942); Singleton v. Board of Commissioners of State Institutions, 356 F.2d 771, 773 (5th Cir. 1966). … Singleton v. Board of Commissioners of State Institutions, 356 F. 2d 771, 773 (5th Cir. 1966).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nguyen v. McHugh

    65 F. Supp. 3d 873 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2014

    Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … She also had no board certifications. Id.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mohr v. United States

    184 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 16, 1960

    Balancio v. United States, 2 Cir., 1959, 267 F.2d 135 ; Berry v. United States, D.C.Or.1957, 157 F.Supp. 317 . … Leahy v. United States, D.C.E.D.N.Y. 1958, 160 F.Supp. 519 . The motion to dismiss is granted Present a judgment of dismissal. 1 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bryson v. U.S. Parole Commission

    776 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 1991

    Board of Parole for a hearing pursuant to D.C. guidelines. In Cosgrove v. … Board of Parole. Cosgrove v. Thornburgh, 703 F.Supp. 995, 1002 (D.D.C.1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • T.O.C., Inc. v. United Artists Theatre Circuit

    631 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1986

    Buchanan v. Delaware Valley News, 571 F.Supp. 868, 871 (E.D.Pa.1983); see also, Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846-47 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters, 29 Cal.2d 34, 42 , 172 P.2d 867 (1946). Accordingly, “[t]he federal and California antitrust laws ... [have] identical objectives [and] are harmonious with each other.” Partee v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ramachandran v. City of L. Altos

    359 F. Supp. 3d 801 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 2019

    Comm'rs v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 403, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) ; Fogel v. Collins , 531 F.3d 824 , 834 (9th Cir. 2008). … , or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board."

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Kaufman and Broad-South Bay v. Unisys Corp.

    822 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 1993

    In 1976, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (“the Regional Board”) issued Abatement Order No. 76-010, ordering the trucking firms to clean up 500 to 600 drums of toxic waste. … See U.S. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.