Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.59s

  • Amalgamated Oil Gas Corp. v. City of San Francisco

    263 F. 617 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 1920

    Ed. 402 , Davis & Farnham v. Los Angeles, etc., 189 U. S. 207 , 23 Sup. Ct. 498, 47 L. Ed. 778 , and Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U. S. 223 , 25 Sup. Ct. 18, 49 L. Ed. 169 , and need not be restated. … Moss & Co. v. McCarthy (C. C.) 191 Fed. 203 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Reichert v. United States

    51 F.R.D. 500 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1970

    Gypsum Carrier’s v. Handlesmann, 307 F.2d 525, 535 (9th Cir. 1962). In Hughes v. … Eaddy v. Little, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Samaniego v. County of Contra Costa

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 29, 2023

    Miller v. … Id.; see Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones-Hamilton Co. v. Kop-Coat, Inc.

    750 F. Supp. 1022 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 20, 1990

    On March 14, 1985, the Water Quality Board found that plaintiff had violated its permit. … In Markley v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Schmid v. County of Sonoma

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2021

    See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. v. … Only after all of that 8 did the Board unanimously affirm the denial. See AR at 31; Schmid Decl. at 10; cf. Cannara v. 9 Nemeth, 467 F. Supp. 3d 877, 884 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Berreyesa

    24 F. Cas. 1134 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1855

    The claim was confirmed by the board. No objection is urged on the part of the United States, and we think their decision should be affirmed. UNITED STATES v. BERREYESA See Case No. 15,140.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. Insurance Securities Inc.

    146 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 29, 1956

    Since the commencement of the action, Trust Fund has, by amendment to its by-laws, authorized the creation of a Board of Directors of its own. 2 . Sec. 15 of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 80a-15. 3 . … Doyle v. Milton, D.C., 73 F.Supp. 281 at pages 284, 285; Addison v. Holly Hill Co., 322 U.S. 007 , 617, 64 S.Ct. 1215 , 88 L.Ed. 1488 . 9 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pratt v. Rowland

    770 F. Supp. 1399 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 1991

    Zimmerlee v. Keeney, 831 F.2d 183, 186 (9th Cir.1987) (citing Wolff v. … The disciplinary board’s ultimate finding need only be supported by “some evidence.” Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 , 105 S.Ct. 2768, 2773 , 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • M. v. County of San Mateo

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 2020

    “Without civil rights litigants 25 who are willing to test the boundaries of our laws, we would not have made much of the progress 26 that has occurred in this nation since [Brown v. Board of Education].” … See Escriba v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. County of Alameda

    967 F. Supp. 2d 1339 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 28, 2013

    Healy v. Beer Institute, 491 U.S. 324 , 337 n. 14, 109 S.Ct. 2491 , 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989) (quoting Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. … .”); CTS Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bagley v. Vice

    57 F. Supp. 272 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 3, 1944

    It appears from the record on appeal and the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals that the question as to petitioner’s personal appearance and hearing before the local draft board was considered and determined. … United States v. Nicholson and United States v. Kennedy, 4 Cir., 141 F.2d 689, 690 . As was said in those cases petitioner “is imprisoned not under the Selective Service Act, but under the judgment of a court.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ralph C. Wilson Industries, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

    598 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 28, 1984

    See, e.g., Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d at 389 . Rather, the court must consider the commercial realities of the situation to arrive at the definition of the relevant market. 9 See, e.g., Brown Shoe Co. v. … See, e.g., National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984); Mid-West Underground Storage, Inc. v. Porter, 717 F.2d 493 (10th Cir.1983); Zoslaw v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • CFNR Operating Co., Inc. v. CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

    282 F. Supp. 2d 1114 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2003

    See Agriesti v. … See, e.g., Florida East Coast Railway Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Westport Insurance Corp. v. California Casualty Management Co.

    249 F. Supp. 3d 1164 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 2017

    The policy defines the term “Insured,” in relevant part, as “[a] member of the Associate of California School Administrators who is employed by a school board, board of trustees or other similar governing body of an educational … , board of trustees, board of regents or any agency established to maintain the California public school system or a four-year institution of higher education; with a minimum per occurrence limit of $1,000,000.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ro Ane v. Mathews

    476 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 1977

    the individual Board members, and its Superintendent of Schools (“local defendants”). … In Weinberger v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Childs v. Gasca

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 23, 2024

    Rodriguez v. … Harrington v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Frisby v. Larsen

    330 F. Supp. 545 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 4, 1971

    Jackson v. Godwin, 400 F.2d 529 (3 Cir. 1968) ; Pierce v. LaVallee, 293 F.2d 233 (Cir. 1961); Gilmore v. Lynch, 326 F. Supp. 330 (N.D.Cal. April 1, 1971). . Estep v. … United States v. Hesse, 417 F.2d 141, 143 (8 Cir. 1969), citing United States v. Corliss, 280 F.2d 808, 814 (2 Cir. 1960). . Helwick v. Laird, 438 F.2d 959, 963 (5 Cir. 1971). . Shirer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mwasi v. Taira

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 2022

    Ashcroft v. … Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Preiser, 411 1 Plaintiff challenges his 2020 denial of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maddox v. County of San Mateo

    746 F. Supp. 947 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1990

    British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 950-52 (9th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1790 , 60 L.Ed.2d 241 (1979). … Assn. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hart v. County of Alameda

    485 F. Supp. 66 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1979

    Board of Higher Education, 461 F.Supp. 99, 106-109 (E.D. N.Y.1978); Drennon v. Philadelphia General Hospital, supra; Barnes v. Converse College, 436 F.Supp. 635 (D.S.C.1977); Vanko v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 491-92 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 439 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). 10 . Although other indicia of legislative intent are somewhat inconclusive, they are not inconsistent with the Court’s view.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.