Case law

Gamage v. Masonic Cemetery Ass'n

31 F.2d 308 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 1929

Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356 , 6 S. Ct. 1064 , 30 L. Ed. 220 ; Hines v. Clarendon Levee District (D. C.) 264 F. 127 . … Carpenter v. Knollwood Cemetery (D. C.) 198 F. 297 ; Chew v. First Presbyterian Church (D. C.) 237 F. 219, 240 .

Cobb v. Laird

329 F. Supp. 780 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 1971

Lambert v. … The actual holding was that draft boards must exercise sound discretion in determining whether to reopen classifications. Schatten v.

United States v. Bryson

16 F.R.D. 431 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 1954

The Government bill of particulars alleged that (1) the jurat of the affidavit was executed in San Francisco, California, and (2) the affidavit was mailed to the board in San Francisco and received by the board by mail. … Holdsworth v. U.

The City of Puebla

153 F. 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1907

The steamer Chehalis was worth $100,000, and she had on board eight passengers. The steamer Norwood was of the value of $121,000. 1. … Justice Bradley in Murphy v. The Suliote (C.

Simpson v. Knut Knutsen, O. A. S.

296 F. Supp. 1308 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 22, 1969

This work had not been completed and the hatch boards had been replaced without replacing the queen beams. … Western Fuel Co. v. Garcia, 257 U.S. 233 , 42 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L.Ed. 210 (1921); Curry v. Fred Olsen Line, (C.A.9, 1966) 367 F.2d 921 ; Igneri v. Cie de Transports Oceaniques, (C.A.2, 1963) 323 F.2d 257 ; Nollenberger v.

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Euroflex S.R.L.

642 F. Supp. 2d 1001 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 2009

Plaintiff appeared by its counsel Robert Payne, and defendants appeared by their counsel Renee DuBord Brown and Michael Rudolph. … MCP has filed an opposition to each of these applications with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”).

United States v. Bernal

24 F. Cas. 1120 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 29, 1861

S. v. Castro, 24 How. [65 U. S.] 350, they would even seem to be inadmissible. … The board rejected the claim, and I have not the slightest doubt of the correctness of their decision.

Lopez v. Monterey County, Cal.

871 F. Supp. 1254 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 10, 1995

State Board of Elections, 775 F.Supp. 1470, 1482 (S.D.Ga.1989). … As noted in Wise v.

Western Addition Community Organization v. Romney

320 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 5, 1969

availability and utilization of relocation aids under a Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 and related appropriation bills, which, although then pending in the Congress, had not yet been passed; (b) adoption by the Board … Sidle v. Baker, 52 Ohio App. 89 , 3 N.E.2d 537 , (Ohio Ct. of Appeals, 1936).

Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. Hillery

658 F. Supp. 2d 1002 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2009

Cabalo v. EMC Mortg. Corp., No. C-08-5667 MMC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8283 , at *7-8 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 5, 2009) (citing cases). See, e.g., Brewer v. Indymac Bank, 609 F.Supp.2d 1104, 1114 (E.D.Cal.2009); Brown v. … LEXIS 8283 , at *8-9; see also Brown, 349 F.Supp.2d at 1137 (explaining the same). The Court agrees with the above cases.

United States v. Southern Pac. Co.

162 F. 412 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 1908

Lilienthal’s Tobacco Co. v. United States, 97 U. S. 237, 271, 272 , 24 L. Ed. 901 ; United States v. Brown, Deady, 566 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,662; The Good Templar (D. C.) 97 Fed. 651 ; Roberge v. Burnham, 124 Mass. 277 . … The case of Roberge v.

United States Ex Rel. McCoy v. California Medical Review, Inc.

723 F. Supp. 1363 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 1989

Potratz, 421 F.Supp. 836 (N.D.Ill.1976) and Liddell v. Board of Educ. of St. Louis, 508 F.Supp. 101 (E.D.Mo.1980) in support of her motion to strike. … Center, 687 F.Supp. 302 (E.D.Mich.1988) (same); United States v. Ettrick Wood Prods., 683 F.Supp. 1262 (W.D.Wis.1988); United States v. Board of Educ. of Union City, 697 F.Supp. 167 (D.N.J.1988) (same); United States v.

Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Maphia

948 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 1996

The Court also GRANTS Sega’s request for a permanent injunction prohibiting further copying of SEGA games by way of the MAPHIA electronic bulletin board, or any bulletin board run by Sherman. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. … MAPHIA Bulletin Board Sherman is the system operator for MAP-HIA, an electronic bulletin board.

State of California v. Department of Navy

631 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 1986

Aminoil U.S.A., Inc. v. California State Water Resources Control Board, 674 F.2d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.1982), quoting American Frozen Food Inst. v. Train, 539 F.2d 107 , 113 (D.C.Cir.1976). … In National Wildlife Federation v.

In re Ellingsen

300 F. 225 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 1924

of any vessel of the United States government, or for three years on board of merchant or fishing vessels of the United States of more than twenty tons burden, and while still in the service on a reenlistment or reappointment … Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443 , 41 Sup. Ct. 172, 65 L. Ed. 349 , 16 A. L. R. 196; Holy Trinity Church v. U. *227 S., 143 U. S. 457 , 12 Sup. Ct. 511, 36 L. Ed. 226 ; Heydenfeldt v.

In re Pacific Coast Warehouse Co.

123 F. 749 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1903

, of the Southern District of New York in the case of In re New York v. … Norris v. Com., 27 Pa. 494 ; Com. v. Natural Gas Co., 32 Pittsb. Leg.

National Union of Healthcare Workers v. Childrens Hospital & Research Center at Oakland

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 2025

v. … Greyhound Lines, Inc. v.

Hall v. McNamara

456 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 26, 1978

See Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147, 150-151 , 89 S.Ct. 735 , 22 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 , 83 S.Ct. 631 , 9 L.Ed.2d 584 (1968); Kunz v. … See Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 420 U.S. 546, 554 , 95 S.Ct. 1239 , 43 L.Ed.2d 448 (1975); Cantwell v. Connecticut, supra, 310 U.S. at 305 , 60 S.Ct. 900 . Similarly, in ISKCON v.

United States ex rel. Bopp v. Abbott

60 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, N.D. California · May 28, 1945

Alves v. Geesen, 59 F.Supp. 726 , and United States ex rel. Faria v. Geesen, 60 F.Supp. 1 . Opinions in both of those cases reviewed authorities which are' applicable here. … In addition thereto we now refer to the opinion in Sullivan v.

Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. Waterman S. S. Corp.

98 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 5, 1951

United States v. Central Wharf Towboard Co., 1 Cir., 8 F.2d 250 . … Similar cases are Belden v. Chase, 150 U.