Case law

In re LendingClub Securities Litigation

254 F. Supp. 3d 1107 · District Court, N.D. California · May 25, 2017

Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd., 551 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 2009). … Ferry LP, No. 2 v. Killinger, 542 F.3d 776, 786 (9th Cir. 2008).

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Plan for Northern California v. Galvez

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2020

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). “For 18 an individual, the paradigm forum for the exercise of general jurisdiction is the individual’s 19 domicile.”

Joseph v. JJ Mac Intyre Companies, LLC

238 F. Supp. 2d 1158 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2002

Assn. v. … Plaintiff cites Lara v. Board of Supervisors of Kern County, 59 Cal.App.3d 399 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 668 (1976) in support of her argument that § 17401 prohibits the collection of interest on all county hospital debts.

Smith v. Royal Ins.

5 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1933

The deed was formally accepted by the board of trustees of the town. … Merrett v. Fanners’ Ins. Co., 42 Iowa, 11 ; Trade Ins. Co. v. Barracliff, 45 N. J. Law, 543, 46 Am. Rep. 792 ; Rayner v. Preston, 18 Ch. D. (C. A.) 1, 15; Harrison v. Pepper, 166 Mass. 288 , 44 N. E. 222 , 33 L. R.

Sherfy v. BARGE MARIN HORIZON, NO. 651632

76 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 1999

To do his job, Sherfy needed to board the barge. To reach the barge, Sherfy first boarded the cargo ship and went to its port side. There, the crew of the cargo ship had rigged a Jacobs ladder between the vessels. … In Mitchell v.

California-Nevada Annual Conference of the Methodist Church v. City of San Francisco

74 F. Supp. 3d 1144 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 2014

On June 5, 2007, the resolution was adopted by the full Board of Supervisors, referring the matter to the City of San Francisco Historic Preservation Board for further study and having the effect of ceasing the land use entitlements … Or the codes permit churches only with individualized permission from the zoning board, and zoning boards use that authority in discriminatory ways. [...]

Wong v. Mihaly

332 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 1971

Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966). The right to run for office must be similarly regarded if the right to vote is to be assured of content. Williams v. … Mc *168 Donald v. Board of Election Comm’rs of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969); Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

Cooks v. Contra Costa County

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2020

Somers v. … Litig., 865 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 8 2017)); see also Sanders v.

Vallejo v. United States

28 F. Cas. 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1862

S. v. Buck. 15 Rel. 222; Noes’ Case, 23 How. [64 U. S.] 315, 316; Fuente’s Case, 2 How. [43 U. S.] 460. … The decision of the board must be affirmed.

Gracier v. Edwards Dental Supply Co.

86 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 1949

Paul Mercury Indemnity ’Co. v. Red Cab. Co., 303 U.S. 283 , 58 S.Ct. 586 , 82 L.Ed. 845 . Accordingly, it is ordered that plaintiff’s motion to remand be and the same hereby is granted. … See Town of Elgin v. Marshall, 106 U.S. 578 , 27 L.Ed. 249 . . The meaning of Section one of the contract, which reads as follows, is the basis for the present action: 1.

San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School District

695 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 1988

Similarly, in Liddell v. Board of Education of St. … See United States v. Texas Education Agency, 790 F.2d 1262 (5th Cir.1986) and Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of Education of Nashville & Davidson County, Tennessee, 836 F.2d 986 (6th Cir.1987).

Armstrong v. Schwarzenegger

261 F.R.D. 173 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2009

Armstrong v. Davis, 275 F.3d 849, 873-74 (9th Cir.2001). … See Pennsylvania Dep’t of Corr. v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206, 212-13 , 118 S.Ct. 1952 , 141 L.Ed.2d 215 (1998) (holding that the ADA is applicable to state prisons); Armstrong v.

Hamel v. Nelson

226 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 1963

Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). … See also Switchman’s Union v. National Mediation Board, supra; United States v. George S. Busch & Co., 310 U.S. 371 , 60 S.Ct. 944 , 84 L.Ed. 1259 (1940); Sellas v.

Letson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

532 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 25, 1982

Prices are quoted in dollars per 1000 board feet. … High Price (12/10/80, 10:01 a.m.) 190.00 Liquidation Price (12/10/80, 9:48 a.m.) 188.60 Difference 1.40 dollars per 1000 board feet Damages equal $1.40 per 1000 board feet, times 130,000 board feet, times five contracts,

United States v. Larkin

26 F. Cas. 870 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1855

In this ease the claim of the appellees was confirmed by the board of commissioners. … S. v. Fremont [18 How. (59 U. S.) 30], and under the authority of that case the excuses for the nonfulfillment of the conditions must be deemed sufficient.

Agnew v. American President Lines, Ltd.

73 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 1947

Steeves v. American Mail Line, Ltd., supra. … Glandzis v. Callinicos, 2 Cir., 140 F.2d 111, 114 ; McCrea v. United States, 294 U.S 23, 55 S.Ct. 291 , 79 L.Ed. 735 . *951 Claim for Maintenance.

Saxton v. County of Sonoma

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 2022

Lopez v. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); 21 Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Woll v. County of Lake

582 F. Supp. 2d 1225 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 2008

Plaintiff relies on dicta in United States v. … See United States v.

MacIas v. Finch

324 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 1970

McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners of Chicago, 1969, 394 U.S. 802, 806-808 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 . 7 As to the usual rules for testing a discrimination, Morey v. … Dent v. West Virginia, 1889, 129 U.S. 114, 122 , 9 S.Ct. 231 , 32 L.Ed. 623 . 6 . Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 1957, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 ; Truax v.

In re Montage Technology Group Ltd. Securities Litigation

78 F. Supp. 3d 1215 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2015

Nov. 1, 2012) (finding undisclosed related party transactions constituting between 20 and 31 percent of defendant’s sales to be material); Brown v. … Defendants’ criticize plaintiffs’ “attempt to plead scienter based on management or board positions[.]” Def.’s Mot. Dismiss at 10.