Case law

Hamel v. Nelson

226 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 1963

Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). … See also Switchman’s Union v. National Mediation Board, supra; United States v. George S. Busch & Co., 310 U.S. 371 , 60 S.Ct. 944 , 84 L.Ed. 1259 (1940); Sellas v.

Willis v. Kane

485 F. Supp. 2d 1126 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 2007

See Sass v. California Board of Prison Terns, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2006). … See Sass, 461 F.3d at 1127-28 ; Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr.

California State Council of Carpenters v. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc.

404 F. Supp. 1067 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 1975

Robertson v. … National Labor Relations Board, 347 U.S. 501 , 74 S.Ct. 699 , 98 L. Ed. 887 (1954).

Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of Mendocino

340 F. Supp. 1061 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 5, 1972

Board of County Com’rs, 215 F.Supp. 208 (D.Colo. 1963); and Central Steel and Wire Co. v. City of Detroit, 99 F.Supp. 639 , 101 F.Supp. 470 (E.D.Mich.1951). … See, Board of Supervisors of County of Modoc v. Archer, 18 Cal.App.3d 717 , 96 Cal.Rptr. 379 (1971).

Guttner v. Pacific Steam Whaling Co.

96 F. 617 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 29, 1899

Jefferies v. Railway Co., 5 El. & Bl. 802; Wheeler v. Lawson, 103 N. Y. 40 , 8 N. E. 360 ; Stowell v. Otis, 71 N. Y. 36 . … Miller v. Baker, 1 Metc. (Mass.) 27; Gibbs v. Chase, 10 Mass. 125 ; Reynolds v. Shuler, 5 Cow. 323 ; Cooley, Torts, p. 448.

United States v. Folsom

25 F. Cas. 1134 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1859

S. v. Sutherland [19 How. (60 U. … S. v. Fossat] 20 How. [61 U.

Gracier v. Edwards Dental Supply Co.

86 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 1949

Paul Mercury Indemnity ’Co. v. Red Cab. Co., 303 U.S. 283 , 58 S.Ct. 586 , 82 L.Ed. 845 . Accordingly, it is ordered that plaintiff’s motion to remand be and the same hereby is granted. … See Town of Elgin v. Marshall, 106 U.S. 578 , 27 L.Ed. 249 . . The meaning of Section one of the contract, which reads as follows, is the basis for the present action: 1.

Clifton v. Central California Womens Facility Health Care

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 2023

See, e.g., Fortson v. Los Angeles City Atty’s Office, 852 F.3d 1190, 5 1192 (9th Cir. 2017) (Calif. Bureau of Firearms entitled to 11th Amendment immunity); Brown v. 6 Cal. … Dep’t of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (California Department of Corrections and 7 California Board of Prison Terms entitled to 11th Amendment immunity); Simmons v.

Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

608 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, N.D. California · May 10, 1985

Logging Co. v. … Potato Bar Ass’n v.

In Re Related Asbestos Cases

566 F. Supp. 818 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 30, 1983

Moe v. … The record shows that, after the acquisition of CMI by Advance in 1971, all the members of the board of directors of CMI were also board members of Advance. ...

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Plan for Northern California v. Galvez

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2020

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). “For 18 an individual, the paradigm forum for the exercise of general jurisdiction is the individual’s 19 domicile.”

In re Ng Len Ngeow

9 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 1935

Applicant, a Chinese hoy of thirteen, was denied admission into the United States by a Board of Special Inquiry, and appeal to the Secretary of Labor was dismissed. … As said by Judge Garrecht in Whitty v. Weedin (C. C.

Lowell v. SECRETARY OF DEPT. OF HOUSING, ETC.

446 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 1977

Plaintiffs next appealed to the San Jose Housing Board, sitting as the Relocation *862 Assistance Appeals Board, which decided on May 12, 1975, to recommend to the City Council that plaintiffs be awarded relocation expenses … See Tullock v. State Highway Commission of Missouri, 507 F.2d 712 (8th Cir. 1974); Whitman v. State Highway Commission of Missouri, 400 F.Supp. 1050 (W.D.Mo.1975); La Raza Unida v.

Kroll v. Silver Line

116 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 1953

Fascolo Margo v. Stag Line, 38 Ll.L.Rep. at p. 276; Tatsuuma Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha v. Robert Dollar Co., 9 Cir., 31 F.2d 401 ; See also, The Asbjorn, N.D. … The Styria, 186 U.S. 1 , 22 S.Ct. 731 , 46 L.Ed. 1027 ; Accinanto v. Cosmopolitan Shipping, D.C.Md., 99 F.

Sherfy v. BARGE MARIN HORIZON, NO. 651632

76 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 1999

To do his job, Sherfy needed to board the barge. To reach the barge, Sherfy first boarded the cargo ship and went to its port side. There, the crew of the cargo ship had rigged a Jacobs ladder between the vessels. … In Mitchell v.

California-Nevada Annual Conference of the Methodist Church v. City of San Francisco

74 F. Supp. 3d 1144 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 2014

On June 5, 2007, the resolution was adopted by the full Board of Supervisors, referring the matter to the City of San Francisco Historic Preservation Board for further study and having the effect of ceasing the land use entitlements … Or the codes permit churches only with individualized permission from the zoning board, and zoning boards use that authority in discriminatory ways. [...]

Wong v. Mihaly

332 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 1971

Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966). The right to run for office must be similarly regarded if the right to vote is to be assured of content. Williams v. … Mc *168 Donald v. Board of Election Comm’rs of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969); Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

Cooks v. Contra Costa County

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2020

Somers v. … Litig., 865 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 8 2017)); see also Sanders v.

San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School District

695 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 1988

Similarly, in Liddell v. Board of Education of St. … See United States v. Texas Education Agency, 790 F.2d 1262 (5th Cir.1986) and Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of Education of Nashville & Davidson County, Tennessee, 836 F.2d 986 (6th Cir.1987).

San Francisco Baykeeper v. WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICT

791 F. Supp. 2d 719 · District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 2011

It is well established that records, reports, and other documents on file with administrative agencies — such as the State Water Resources Control Board — are judicially noticeable. Lee v. … State Board.