Case law

Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. Covad Communications Co.

232 F. Supp. 2d 1066 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 13, 2002

Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Services, 277 F.3d 1166 , 1170 (9th Cir.2002). … In Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v.

Chowdhury v. Northwest Airlines Corp.

226 F.R.D. 608 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2004

Id.; see also Weil v. … Vescio, 205 B.R. 37 (D.Vt.1997) (following Bankers Trust with respect to Federal Reserve Board non-disclosure regulations); McElya v.

Favell-Utley Realty Co. v. Harbor Plywood Corp.

94 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 20, 1950

Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 ; see also Nagl v. Northam Warren Corp., D. C., 8 F.R.D. 130 , and Duke v. Pioneer Mining & Ditch Co., D.C. 280 F. 883 . … Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., supra. Recent trends appear to be to the contrary, at least so far as service of process is concerned. For example, the court in Bomze- v.

Nehmer v. United States Veterans Administration

32 F. Supp. 2d 1175 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 1999

Akles v. … See Crippen v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 412, 420 (1996)(“[b]e-fore [February 1990, VA] decisions routinely lacked ... specificity”) Eddy v.

Brower v. Daley

93 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2000

Earth Island Institute (“EIS”) v. Brown, 865 F.Supp. 1364, 1366 (N.D.Cal.1994). … EIS v. Brown, 865 F.Supp. at 1366 . In 1972, Congress enacted the Marine Mammal Protection Act (“MMPA”) to protect dolphins in the ETP. See e.g. Committee for Humane Legislation, Inc. v.

Sizemore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Retirement Plan

952 F. Supp. 2d 894 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2013

On June 21, 2006, the subsidiary’s board of directors passed a set five resolutions (AR 1926-27). … United States v. Mett, 178 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.1999).

Stratton v. Komada & Co.

148 F. 125 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 1906

United States v. Nishimiya, 137 Fed. 396 , 69 C. C. A. 588 . … The decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers is affirmed.

East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304 v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.

285 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1968

Fibreboard’s refusal to negotiate has been the subject of much litigation before the National Labor Relations Board, culminating in the United States Supreme Court decision of Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. … It affirmed the determination by the Board that Fibreboard’s refusal to bargain was in violation of the Act, thereby affirming the Board’s order of reinstatement and award of back pay from the date of the Board’s Supplemental

Semple v. United States

21 F. Cas. 1073 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 1855

It was considered by the board “that the only thing which is certain in this description is, that the land is bounded on one side by the Sacramento river. … SEMPLE (UNITED STATES v.). See Case No. 16.250. A decree of confirmation must therefore be entered.

Brinkin v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

572 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 1983

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Franchise Tax Board, 103 S.Ct. at 2847 , quoting Gully v. First National Bank, 299 U.S. 109, 112 , 57 S.Ct. 96, 97 , 81 L.Ed. 70 (1936). The complaint in this case sets forth three causes of action.

Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

904 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 2012

See Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 137-38 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). 2. … See Sindell, 26 Cal.3d at 594-95, 610-11 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 132 , 607 P.2d 924 (alternative liability doctrine of “conspiracy”); Brown v.

Hiroshi Okada v. Dulles

134 F. Supp. 183 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 1955

With the consent of his Draft Board he went back to Japan. While there he requested and obtained extensions from his Draft Board. During his last extension, war commenced between Japan and the United States. … Knauer v. United States, 328 U.S. 654 ,. 66 S.Ct. 1304 , 90 L.Ed. 1500 ; Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118 , 63 S.Ct. 1333 , 87 L.Ed. 1796 .

Pughe v. Lyle

10 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 19, 1935

Morgan v. City of Long Beach, 57 Cal. App. 134 , 207 P. 53 ; Los Angeles Dredging Company v. Long Beach, 210 Cal. 348 , 291 P. 839 , 71 A. L. R. 161. … “The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara do ordain as follows: “Section 1.

Bechtel Petroleum, Inc. v. Webster

636 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 18, 1985

Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 817 , 96 S.Ct. 1236, 1246 , 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976); Champion International Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406 (9th Cir.1984). … See Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153-54 , 99 S.Ct. 970, 973-74 , 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979); Nash County Board of Education v.

Lee Mon Hong v. McGranery

110 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 12, 1953

By stipulation of counsel the record of the Board of Special Inquiry hearing, together with all its exhibits, was introduced in evidence. … An action brought under Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940 is an independent suit and not a review of the Board of Special Inquiry proceedings, Wong Wing Foo v. McGrath, 9 Cir., 196 F. 2d 120 .

California v. United States

27 F.R.D. 261 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 1961

As stated by the Supreme Court in Hickman v. … See, Brown v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1955, 17 F.R.D. 324 ; Hesch v. Erie R. Co., D.C.N.D.Ohio 1952, 14 F.R.D. 518 .

Hott v. City of San Jose

92 F. Supp. 2d 996 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2000

Hott appealed to the City’s Appeals Hearing Board. On July 22, 1999, the Appeals Hearing Board upheld the revocation of Hott’s license. San Jose Appeals Hearing Board Resolution 99-65 (1999). … See Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 96 n. 14, 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983); Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa, 45 F.3d 1261, 1269 (9th Cir.1994); Air Transport Ass’n of America v.

Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.

515 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 1981

Selchow & Righter Co. v. … This case is sharply contrasted with both Selchow & Righter Co. v.

Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

748 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 9, 1990

Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. … See, Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v.

Pacific Far East Line v. California Stevedore & Ballast Co.

238 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1965

These two men were the top men in charge of loading cargo on board the Korean Bear at the time in question. … Sherwood Sylvia was a gang boss in charge of the gang working at the forward end at No. 5 hatch directly aft the ship’s house on board the Korean Bear on the night in question.