Case law

Utility Reform Network v. California Public Utilities Commission

26 F. Supp. 2d 1208 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1997

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Fidelity Fin. Corp. v. … See Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107 , 114 S.Ct. 2068 , 129 L.Ed.2d 93 (1994) (National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”)); Morales v.

Grimes v. United States

11 F. Cas. 49 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1855

The claim in this case was rejected by the board of commissioners. … The objection, therefore, of nonperformance of conditions must, under the principles laid down in Fremont v. U. S. [17 How. (58 U. S.) 542] be overruled.

Board of Trustees of the Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan v. Petersen-Dean, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 2020

Civ. 13 P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986). A “genuine issue” exists if a 14 reasonable jury could find for the non-moving party. E.g., Open Text v. … Pension Fund v. Mar-Len, Inc., 30 F.3d 13 621 (5th Cir. 1994) and Trustees of Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse 14 Workers Union (Indep.) Pension Fund v.

Gatx/Airlog Co. v. Evergreen International Airlines, Inc.

8 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 1998

Justice Cardozo (then Chief Judge) wrote in Meinhard v. Salmon, 249 N.Y. 458, 464 , 164 N.E. 545, 546 (1928) (quoting Wendt v. … In Flatt v.

Jefferson v. Heinze

201 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 1962

People, 9 Cir., 284 F.2d 827 ; Muhlenbroich v. Heinze, 9 Cir., 281 F.2d 881 ; Anderson v. Heinze, 9 Cir., 258 F.2d 479 ; Graeber v. Schneckloth, 9 Cir., 241 F.2d 710 ; Reid v. Charney, 6 Cir., 235 F.2d 47 ; Collins v. … Heinze, 9 Cir., 217 F.2d 62 ; Dorsey v. Gill, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 9 , 148 F.2d 857 ; Hodge v. Huff, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 140 F.2d 686 ; Brown v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 91 F.2d 370 ; and De Maris v.

Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.

515 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 1981

Selchow & Righter Co. v. … This case is sharply contrasted with both Selchow & Righter Co. v.

United States v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.

141 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1955

The rate agreement has been approved by the Federal Maritime Board. … Far East Conference v. United States, 1952, 342 U.S. 570 , 72 S.Ct. 492 , 96 L.Ed. 576 ; United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co., 1932, 284 U.S. 474 , 52 S.Ct. 247 , 76 L.Ed. 408 .

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. County of Santa Clara -California

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 2019

Khoja v. … Res. of State of Wash. v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937, 944 (9th 15 Cir. 1993).

Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Elite Waterproofing & Epoxy Flooring

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 2025

Plan v. … In Central States, Southeast and 24 Southwest Areas Pension Fund v.

Ilc Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.

458 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1978

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 325 n. 42 [ 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 ] . . . (1962); United States v. Columbia Steel Co., 334 U.S. 495, 510-11 [ 68 S.Ct. 1107 , 92 L.Ed. 1533 ] . . . (1948). … In United States v. Grinnell Corp., supra, 384 U.S. at 572 , 86 S.Ct. at 1704 , the Supreme Court indicated that “[i]n § 2 cases under the Sherman Act, as in § 7 cases under the Clayton Act (Brown Shoe Co. v.

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. County of Santa Clara -California

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 2019

Khoja v. … Res. of State of Wash. v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937, 944 (9th 15 Cir. 1993).

United States v. Blair-Murdock Co.

228 F. 77 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 1915

In a case tried in 1855, involving the construction of this statute (United States v. Hertz, Fed. Cas. … for his board himself.”

Chowdhury v. Northwest Airlines Corp.

226 F.R.D. 608 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2004

Id.; see also Weil v. … Vescio, 205 B.R. 37 (D.Vt.1997) (following Bankers Trust with respect to Federal Reserve Board non-disclosure regulations); McElya v.

United States v. Knowles

26 F. Cas. 800 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 1864

Reg. v. Pargeter, 3 Cox, Cr. Cas. 191. … Reg. v. Haines, 2 Car. & K. *802 368.

Targett v. United States

551 F. Supp. 1231 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 1982

Brown v. United States, 348 U.S. 110, 113 , 75 S.Ct. 141, 145 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954). … United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 , 100 S.Ct. 352 , 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979); Davis, 642 F.2d at 330 ; Stoleson v. United States, supra, 629 F.2d at 1268-69 ; Schnurman v.

Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Reimel

266 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 1967

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Company, 263 U.S. 413 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners, 257 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 882 , 79 S.Ct. 123 , 3 L.Ed.2d 111 (1958). … Plaintiff’s attempt to ground this action on England v. Louisiana Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964), is without merit.

Sizemore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Retirement Plan

952 F. Supp. 2d 894 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2013

On June 21, 2006, the subsidiary’s board of directors passed a set five resolutions (AR 1926-27). … United States v. Mett, 178 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.1999).

Stratton v. Komada & Co.

148 F. 125 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 1906

United States v. Nishimiya, 137 Fed. 396 , 69 C. C. A. 588 . … The decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers is affirmed.

Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. Covad Communications Co.

232 F. Supp. 2d 1066 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 13, 2002

Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Services, 277 F.3d 1166 , 1170 (9th Cir.2002). … In Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v.

Brinkin v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

572 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 1983

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Franchise Tax Board, 103 S.Ct. at 2847 , quoting Gully v. First National Bank, 299 U.S. 109, 112 , 57 S.Ct. 96, 97 , 81 L.Ed. 70 (1936). The complaint in this case sets forth three causes of action.