Case law

Wong Gum v. McGranery

111 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 1953

In Lee Choy v. … Mar Gong v. McGranery, D.C.S.D.Cal., 1952, 109 F.Supp. 821 . I agree with the viewpoint taken by the Court in Ly Shew v. Acheson, D.C.

Hatch v. Heckler

626 F. Supp. 1367 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 1986

In Iglinsky v. … Alternatively, in Worley v.

Wade v. Harris

509 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 1980

E. g., Chavies v. Finch, 443 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1971); Rhinehart v. Finch, 438 F.2d 920 (9th Cir. 1971). An administrative hearing was held on March 5, 1979. … In Brown v. Gardner, 249 F.Supp. 968 (N.D.Ala.1965), the plaintiff had refused to attend consultative examinations on advice of counsel.

Bode v. The Templar

59 F. 203 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1893

In Crawford v. … Provost v. Patchin, 9 N. Y. 239 , and cases there cited.

United States v. Hoppe

26 F. Cas. 371 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 1859

S. v. Fossatt, 21 How. [62 U. S.] 450, had been supposed to be its final decrees. … S. v. Fossatt, 21 How. [62 U. S.] 450, 451.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Railroad Commission

26 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 1938

So, if we assume that the property of the Company has a going concern value of $12,000,000, and apply the principle announced in Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. … Board of Public Utility Com’rs v. New York Telephone Co., 271 U.S. 23, 31 , 46 S.Ct. 363, 366 , 70 L.Ed. 808 .

Owens v. Fugate

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 2021

Atascadero State 1 suits against a state agency, including the CDCR, Brown v. Cal. … official capacities, 4 see Kentucky v.

J.L. v. Cissna

374 F. Supp. 3d 855 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 2019

Ressler v. … See Yu v. Brown , 92 F.Supp.2d 1236 , 1252 (D.N.M. 2000) ("[A]pplicants must ... seek a favorable exercise of INS discretion.

Valeria G. v. Wilson

12 F. Supp. 2d 1007 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1998

Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education, 811 F.2d 1030, 1037 (7th Cir.1987). See also Idaho Migrant Council v. Board of Education, 647 F.2d 69, 71 (9th Cir.1981). … of Education, and local school boards.

McCormick S. S. Co. v. United States

16 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1936

The case of Lucking v. Detroit & Cleveland Nav. … S.C.A. § 126), authorizing the President to abolish boards like the United States Shipping Board, a separate entity, and transfer the boards’ functions to such an executive branch of the government as the Department of Commerce

National Union of Healthcare Workers v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

13 F. Supp. 3d 1044 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 2014

See also SEIU v. SEIU-UHW, No. C 09-00404 WHA (NJD.Cal.2010), aff 'd sub nom. SEIU v. NUHW, No. 10-16549 (9th Cir.2013). … in Unite Here Local 355 v.

Michaeledes v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District

202 F. Supp. 2d 1109 · District Court, N.D. California · May 17, 2002

Board of Comm’rs, 333 F.Supp. 353, 354 (E.D.La.1971) (Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans) (see cases collected at 356 n. 10). … For example, the District appears to be managed by a Board of Directors composed of appointees of the boards of supervisors of six of the surrounding counties. See id., § 27510.

Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, et al. v. CEM Builders, Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2018

See Trustees of the 2 Screen Actors Guild–Producers Pension & Health Plans v. NYCA, Inc., 572 F.3d 771, 774-76 (9th 3 Cir. 2009); Board of Trustees v. RBS Washington Blvd. LLC, 2010 WL 145097, at *2 (N.D. … See Brown Decl., ¶ 20; 21 Stafford Decl., ¶ 29; Stafford Supp. Decl., ¶ 5.

Herrington v. County of Sonoma

790 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 1991

See Agins v. … See Nemmers v. City of Dubuque, 764 F.2d 502, 505 (8th Cir.1985); Wheeler v.

In re Charles Nelson Co.

27 F. Supp. 673 · District Court, N.D. California · May 25, 1939

In re Fox West Coast Theatres, 9 Cir., 88 F.2d 212, 227 ; Ramish, Inc., v. Laugharn, 9 Cir., 86 F.2d 686, 688 ; Exchange Nat. Bank v. … Co. v. Marsch, 1 Cir., 59 F.2d 59, 61 ; Ingels v. Boteler, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 915 ; Dayton v. Stanard, 241 U.S. 588 , 36 S.Ct. 695 , 60 L.Ed. 1190 . Longmaid v. Coulter, 123 Cal. 208 , 55 P. 791 . Torrington Co. v.

PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 2021

Atascadero State 1 suits against a state agency, including the CDCR, Brown v. Cal. … official capacities, 4 see Kentucky v.

Smith v. Dutra Trucking Company

410 F. Supp. 513 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 1976

B. v. … The obvious purpose of this amendment was to have the Board and the courts apply general agency principles in distinguishing between employees and independent contractors under the Act.” N. L. R. B. v.

The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2022

But in Capogeannis v. … In Baker v.

Raymond v. The Ella S. Thayer

40 F. 902 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 1887

The master urged him to remain on board, offering to provide for him medical advice and assistance, and to fako him back to Ban Francisco. … Cal lon v. Williams, 2 Low. 1 .

The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 2, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Case No. 18-cv-01199-VC LELAND STANFORD … Northstar Associates v. W.R.