Case law

Plata v. Schwarzenegger

556 F. Supp. 2d 1087 · District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 2008

Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F.Supp. 1146, 1258 (N.D.Cal.1995). … To support its position, the SPB relies heavily on the California Supreme Court’s decision in State Personnel Board v.

Lektophone Corp. v. Rola Co.

27 F.2d 758 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 17, 1928

Moreover, Brown (British, 29,833), if not Lumire (986,477), had made use of the method in the prior art. And, even as here, these claims have been held invalid. See Lektophone Corp. v. Brandes Corporation (C. C. … Hopkins’ tympanum differs nothing from Brown’s (British, 29,833), Stroh’s (British, 3,393), and Dann and Lapp’s (338,660), and little from English’s (1,192,289), save in point of size and consequent volume, and Brown had

United States v. McClintock

311 F. Supp. 1119 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 15, 1970

Local Board No. 16, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 (1970); Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 , 90 S.Ct. 506 , 24 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970). … See United States v. Fink, Cr. No. 42945, N.D.Cal., January 9, 1970.

Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus Marmoratus) v. Pacific Lumber Co.

880 F. Supp. 1343 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 1995

Both adult murrelets and their chicks have “cryptic plumage;” during the breeding season, the adult’s plumage is dark brown and gray with black bars above and a heavily mottled light brown below. (Pls.’ … Ex. 334 at V-4.) 80.

In Re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Deriv. Lit.

574 F. Supp. 2d 1046 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 27, 2008

majority of the new board was also on the old board. … V.

Oler v. Trustees of the California State University & Colleges

80 F.R.D. 319 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 1978

In opposing the motion to dismiss, plaintiff contends that under England v. … issues in the state complaint to comply with Government Employees v.

In re Chaboya

9 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 17, 1934

Duff v. Randall, 116 Cal. 226, 230 , 48 P. 66, 67 , 58 Am. St. Rep. 158 . … Brown v. Timmons, 79 Mont. 246 , 256 P. 176, 178 , 57 A. L. R. 1122.

Weir v. Curry

719 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2010

Board’s finding. … V & XIV.

United States v. Santos

785 F. Supp. 843 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 1992

Defendant argues that it had no intention of appealing the boards decision; therefore, the decision became final when issued. In support of its position plaintiff cites White Mountain Apache Tribe v. … The Gottlieb court specifically distinguished its case from that in F.D.I.C. v. Former Officers and Directors of Metropolitan Bank, 884 F.2d 1304 (9th Cir.1989), cert denied sub nom, Lee v.

Rohm v. Homer

367 F. Supp. 2d 1278 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 2005

Esparza” but that Homer could do nothing about it because “Esparza is an officer on the union board and employee.” Compl. ¶ 35. … See Brown v. Smith, 55 Cal.App.4th 767, 787-88 , 64 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 (1997) (amendment was intended only “to plug [a] hole in the civil rights law”).

Swingless Golf Club Corp. v. Taylor

732 F. Supp. 2d 899 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2010

Co., 518 F.3d 1097, 1103 (9th Cir.2008); see also Nilsson v. … Bank of New York v. Fremont General Corp., 523 F.3d 902, 914 (9th Cir.2008).

Wickland Oil Terminals v. Asarco, Inc.

654 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 1987

See Hodel v. … As the Ninth Circuit has stated in Willis v.

United States v. Soltermann

163 F. Supp. 397 · District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 1958

As stated in Laughlin’s Estate v. … See also Brown v. U. S., D.C., 121 F. Supp. 106 . For the reasons stated it is the opinion of .the court that the periodic payments made to the defendant by her former husband were includable in her gross income.

Roller v. City of San Mateo

399 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 1975

Cf. e. g., Whitsel v. Southeast Local School District, 484 F.2d 1222 (6th Cir. 1973); Tomlin v. U. S. Air Force Medical Center, 369 F.Supp. 353 (S.D. Ohio 1974); Hackley v. … Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, 375 F.Supp. 95 *365 (N.D.I11.1974), aff’d, 503 F.2d 105 (7th Cir. 1974); Handy v. Gayler, 364 F.Supp. 676 (D.C.Md.1973); see Schooler v.

The President

92 F. 673 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1899

In fulfillment of this agreement the libelants were taken on board the President at St. … J., in Young v.

Lee Hong v. Acheson

110 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 22, 1953

Medeiros v. Clark, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 82 F. S.upp. 412, 416. See also Gan Seow Tung v. Carusi, D.C.S.D.Cal., 83 F.Supp. 480, 481 . … Lee Bang Hong v. Acheson, D.C., 110 F.Supp. 48 ; Hong Yick Ming v. Acheson, D.C.N.D.Cal.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Bank of Stockton

213 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 1963

Brown, supra; Security Insurance Company v. Snyder-Lynch Motors, supra; Reed v. Pacific Indemnity Company (1950), 101 Cal.App.2d 151 , 225 P.2d 255 ; Gibson v. Colonial Insurance Company, supra; Abrams v. … See also, National Automobile v. Brown, supra, and Security Insurance Company v. Snyder-Lynch, supra.

United States v. Malone

336 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 28, 1972

In McKart v. … In Lockhart v.

Peterson v. Albert M. Bender Co.

75 F.R.D. 661 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 1977

out that Wells v. … The court there phrased the requirement in terms of a nexus between the plaintiff and the members of the class; it was not a rejection of the across-the-board approach. Moreover, the Ninth Circuit in Gibson v.

Petersen v. Clark

285 F. Supp. 700 · District Court, N.D. California · May 28, 1968

Compare Kimball v. Selective Service Local Board No. 15, 283 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.1968). … See, e. g., Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 284 F.Supp. 749 (D.Conn.1968); compare Daniels v.