Case law

De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator Constructors

438 F. Supp. 1121 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 1977

See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (remedies under Title VII pre-empt remedies under § 1981 for discrimination against federal governmental employees); Johnson v. … Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 219 , *1133 226, 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977).

Rury T. McKay

84 F. 360 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1897

On the 24th day of April, 1897, the libelant agreed to serve as a seaman on board the schooner Occidental, under shipping articles signed by him, and containing the following provisions: “It is agreed between the master and … Griffith, 71 Fed. 317 , and that of Heinrici v.

In re Ezeta

62 F. 964 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 1894

Cas. 525; State v. Smith (1829) 1 Bailey, 283 ; State v. Brewster (1835) 7 Vt. 118 ; Dow’s Case, (1851) 18 Pa. St. 37; State v. Ross (1866) 21 Iowa, 467 ; The Richmond v. U. S., 9 Cranch, 102 . … Mahon v. Justice, 127 U. S. 700 -717, 8 Sup. Ct. 1204.

Southern Pac. Co. v. Corbett

20 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 10, 1937

Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co., 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 , and Edwards v. U. S. (C.C.A.9) 91 F.(2d) 767 , decided July 22, 1937. … Minnesota Rate Cases (Simpson v. Shepard) 230 U.S. 352, 399 , 33 S.Ct. 729 , 57 L.Ed. 1511 , 48 L.R.A.(N.S.) 1151, Ann.Cas.1916A, 18; National Labor Relations Board v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co.

Schafer v. Mitchell

304 F. Supp. 1227 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 1969

The Court is strongly persuaded by the reasoning and holding in Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 297 F.Supp. 252 (D.C.Conn. February 13, 1969) (1969). … Oestereich v. Selective Service Local Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968).

In re Van Der Schuur

20 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 1937

. § 388 ), which reads in part as follows: “any alien * * * who has served for three years on board of any vessel of the United States Government, or for three years on board vessels of more than twenty tons’ burden * * * … Co. v. Gardner, 173 U.S. 123 , 19 S.Ct. 327, 329 , 43 L.Ed. 637 . Applying the law to the facts disclosed here, I think that the petition for naturalization should be granted.

S. S. Seatrain Louisiana v. California Stevedore & Ballast Co.

424 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 20, 1976

In Seas Shipping Co. v. … The employees being covered by the Act, their estates received compensation from their employer, the Board of Trade.

Transamerica Computer Co. v. International Business Machines Corp.

481 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 1979

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed. 510 (1962); [“Brown Shoe ”] International T. & T. Corp. v. General T. & E. Corp., 518 F.2d 913, 932 (9th Cir. 1975). . International T. & T. … Brown Shoe, supra n. 16, 370 U.S. at 344 , 82 S.Ct. at 1534 . . Standard Oil of New Jersey v.

In Re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Deriv. Lit.

574 F. Supp. 2d 1046 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 27, 2008

majority of the new board was also on the old board. … V.

McFarlane v. DeYoung

311 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 20, 1970

In this situation, the scope and extent of petitioner’s obligation is to be determined against the standard recently enunciated by the Ninth Circuit Court in Beaty v. Kenan, 420 F.2d 55 , (9th Cir. 1969). … Local Board No. 20 requested petitioner’s appearance as a result of information brought to the attention of the Board by a third party.

Dana v. United States

6 F. Cas. 1142 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1855

Claim for about six thousand acres of land in Santa Clara county, rejected by the board, and appealed by the claimants. … Its validity v as not doubted by the board, and it has been confirmed in another case now before this court But the claim in the present case is for a certain part of the tract originally granted, which is alleged to have

Kentucky Central Life Insurance v. LeDuc

814 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 28, 1992

Co. v. … In American Int'l Group v.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. National Semiconductor Corp.

38 F. Supp. 2d 802 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 12, 1999

Inc. v. … In Gould, Inc. v.

United Railroads v. City & County of San Francisco

239 F. 987 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 1917

In Omnibus Railroad Co. v. … Bacon v. Walker, 204 U. S. 311 , 27 Sup. Ct. 289, 51 L. Ed. 499 ; German Alliance Insurance Co. v. Kansas, 233 U. S. 389 , 34 Sup. Ct. 612, 58 L. Ed. 1011 , L. R. A. 1915C, 1189; Rail & River Coal Co. v. Yaple (D.

Miller v. Claytor

466 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 1979

Compare West v. Chafee, 560 F.2d 942, 944-5 (8th Cir. 1977) and Karlin v. Reed, 584 F.2d 365 (10th Cir. 1978) with Nicholson v. Rumsfeld, 425 F.Supp. 780, 782-3 (N.D.Tex.1977) and Ornato v. … (Matlovich v.

United States v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union

78 F. Supp. 710 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 1948

(In other words, the injunction remains effective for a maximum period of 80 days.) 2 The contentions in this respect advanced by defendants have been disposed of: Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co. v. … S. 548 , 50 S.Ct. 427 , 74 L.Ed. 1034 ; Allen Bradley Co. v. Union, 325 U.S. 797 , 65 S.Ct. 1533 , 89 L.Ed. 1939 ; Dorchy v. Kansas, 272 U.S. 306 , 47 S.Ct. 86 , 71 L. Ed. 248 ; United States v.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hudson

800 F. Supp. 867 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 1990

Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner and Co., 883 F.2d 1429, 1436 (9th Cir.1989). … In Langley v.

Lyster v. First Nationwide Bank Financial Corp.

829 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1993

Holcomb v. … The Court in Merrell Dow made it quite clear that the secondary basis for federal question jurisdiction set forth in Franchise Tax Board is to be construed narrowly: “Franchise Tax Board ... did not purport to disturb the

The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Chi-yi

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2022

Co. 8 v. Brown-Kingston, 2019 WL 8137717, at *2 (E.D. Cal. … Bank v.

Tanforan Co. v. United States

313 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 1970

See also Keller Street Development Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 323 F.2d 166 (9th Cir. 1963); United California Bank v. … Feldman v. Wood, 335 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1964); Ford v. United States, 20 A.F.T.R.2d 5031 , 67-2 U.S.T.C. 9546 (W.D.Ky.1967).