Case law

Clark v. Brown

322 F. Supp. 1389 · District Court, Canal Zone · Feb 16, 1971

Caton v. Canal Zone Government

522 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, Canal Zone · Oct 1, 1981

A lion in the street is the Supreme Court’s opinion in Brown v. … See REA v. Middendorf, 587 F.2d 4 (6th Cir. 1978); Craig v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 581 F.2d 189 (8th Cir. 1978); Bell v. Brown, 557 F.2d 849 (D.C.Cir.1977). Compare Decker v.

Pinto v. VESSEL" SANTA ISABEL"

492 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, Canal Zone · May 27, 1980

At the same time plaintiff’s longshore crew boarded the vessel, so did a clean-up crew. … United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 407 (5th Cir. 1977); Dore v. Kleppe, 522 F.2d 1369 (5th Cir. 1975). A conflict in the reported cases suggest that this court should fully explore the issue. Some statements in Edmonds v.

In Re Complaint of Black Sea Steamship Co.

382 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, Canal Zone · Oct 22, 1974

sessions on its use on board the “SVETLOGORSK”, the language used was merely hortatory and not mandatory. … Ocean Steamship Co. of Savannah v. United States, 38 F.2d 782, 784 (2d Cir. 1930). 11. In United Geophysical Co. v.

Natalie Tankships Corp. v. Panama Canal Commission

506 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, Canal Zone · Dec 18, 1980

Volkswagenwerk Aktlengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission, 390 U.S. 261, 272 , 88 S.Ct. 929, 935 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1090, 1098 , (1968), quoting NLRB v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965).

Potash Company of Canada Limited v. M/V Raleigh

361 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, Canal Zone · Jul 25, 1973

See Phila., Wilm. and Balt. v. Lehman, 56 Md. 209 ; Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee Co., D.C., 70 F. 764 ; Thomas v. Lancaster Mills, 71 F. 481 , 19 CCA 88; also Henry Siegel Co., D.C., 223 F. 369 and Hornor v. … In a recent case, Brandon v.

Sociedad de Transportes Maritimos, S.A. v. Panama Canal Co.

163 F. Supp. 151 · District Court, Canal Zone · Jun 30, 1958

See The Dora Allison, D.C., 213 F. 645 ; General Petroleum Corp. of Calif. v. City of Los Angeles, 42 Cal.App.2d 591 , 109 P.2d 754 . … See General Petroleum of Calif. v. City of Los Angeles, supra; Sanders v. Meyestein, D.C., 124 F.Supp. 77 ; The Marian, 9 Cir., 66 F.2d 354 ; The Severance, 4 Cir., 152 F.2d 916 ; The Anaconda, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 224 . 4.

Guarrasi v. Panama Canal Co.

271 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, Canal Zone · Aug 11, 1967

I am persuaded by the opinion of Justice Holmes written in the case of Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. … The recently reported decision, Henderson v.

Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku K. K. Tokyo

288 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, Canal Zone · Aug 22, 1968

In Pope & Talbot Inc. v. … In Petterson v. Alaska S. S.

Walker v. Chief Quarantine Officer

69 F. Supp. 980 · District Court, Canal Zone · Aug 14, 1943

Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall. 35 , 18 L.Ed. 744 ; Ives v. South Buffalo R. Co., 201 N.Y. 271 , 94 N.E. 431 , 34 L.R.A., N.S. 162. … Vol. 6 C.J.S., Army and Navy; § 34, page 417; Schreiner v. United States, 43 Ct.Cl. 480 .

Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku K. K. Tokyo

313 F. Supp. 719 · District Court, Canal Zone · May 22, 1970

As he was on board as a workman to aid in the navigation and transit of the canal, he was not a passenger and it is believed that he fits within the definition laid down in Southern Chicago Coal & Dock Company v. … to the nature of the arrangement under which they are on board.’

Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Panama Canal Co.

236 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, Canal Zone · Jan 11, 1965

Jacobs, boarded the vessel to navigate her through the Canal. … Dougherty Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 207 F.2d 626 ; Crawford v. Indian Towing Co., 5 Cir., 240 F.2d 308 . 7.

Boyd v. Panama Canal Co.

160 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, Canal Zone · Jan 10, 1958

Ass’n v. … Bank v.

Anderson v. Panama Canal Co.

194 F. Supp. 765 · District Court, Canal Zone · Apr 21, 1961

S. v. … United States v. Wurtz, 303 U.S. 414 , 58 S.Ct. 637 , 82 L.Ed. 932 ; Cabel v. U. S., 1 Cir., 113 F.2d 998 ; Boyd v. Panama Canal Co., supra.

Royal Interocean Lines v. Panama Canal Co.

514 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, Canal Zone · May 14, 1981

BROWN, Circuit Judge. * This matter came on trial before the Court. All material facts are stipulated by the parties. … See also Mathiesen v.

Westfal-Larsen & Co. v. Panama Canal Co.

354 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, Canal Zone · Feb 21, 1973

[Andros Shipping Co. v. Panama Canal Company, 184 F.Supp. 246 (D.C.Z.1960) aff’d 298 F.2d 720 (5th Cir. 1962); Mariblanca, supra; Louis Dreyfus & Cie. v. Panama Canal Company, 298 F.2d 733 (5th Cir. 1962)]. 3. … This Court has given great credence and weight to the findings of the Boards in the past although it has not been joined whole heartedly in this viewpoint by the Court of Appeals. See Luckenbach Steamship Co. v.

Afran Transport Co. v. Steamship Transcolorado

321 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, Canal Zone · Jan 28, 1971

as free from pressures that could sway them in their decisions as members of any similar board. … (Berger v. Belgulf Tankers, S. A., D.C., 270 F.Supp. 813, 818-819 ; affirmed, per curiam 5 Cir., 396 F.2d 453 ). 5.

Victorias Milling Co. v. Panama Canal Co.

162 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, Canal Zone · Apr 22, 1955

Dreyfus & Cie v. Panama Canal Company, 1954 A.M.C. 652 , 656. 3. … Richmond Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp., 4 Cir., 1948, 170 F.2d 392 ; Dreyfus & Cie v. Panama Canal Company, 1954 A.M.C. 652 , 656. 5.

Shultz v. Canal Zone Bus Service, Inc.

311 F. Supp. 978 · District Court, Canal Zone · Apr 7, 1970

Perez 2729.79 Kenneth Roberts 1375.19 Wilton Rose 2518.59 Robert Taylor 1390.14 Edwin Zamora 2757.24 Bolivar Arrocha 484.51 Rogelio Bernard 730.58 Francis Bravo 532.25 Hilario Brown 666.20 J. Brown 912.29 H. … Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183 , 88 S.Ct. 2017 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1968); Shultz v. Mack Farland Roofing Co., Inc., 413 F.2d 1296 (C.A.5); Wirtz v. Washeterias, S.A., 304 F.Supp. 624 (D.C.Canal Zone, 1968).

Mathiesen v. Panama Canal Co.

389 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, Canal Zone · Feb 20, 1975

V. Stoomvaart Maatschappij Nederland. 4. … Whisenant v. Brewster-Bartle Offshore Co., 446 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1971), also see Parfait v. Jahncke Service Inc., 484 F.2d 296 (5th Cir. 1973).