Case law

Nichols v. Board of Retirement

121 Cal. App. 2d 176 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1953

(Shaw v. Board of Administration, supra, and cases there cited.) … In Shaw v. Board of Administration, supra, similar sections of the State Employees’ Retirement Law (Gov. Code, § 20000 et seq.) were under consideration.

Bridge v. Board of Education

2 Cal. App. 2d 398 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1934

In support of her contention respondent cites Ahern v. Livermore Union High School District, 208 Cal. 770 [ 284 Pac. 1105 ], Meade v. Oakland High School District, 212 Cal. 419 [ 298 Pac. 987 ], and Damgaard v. … (Huff v. Compton City Grammar School District, supra; Dawson v. Tulare Union High School, supra.)

Raney v. Board of Trustees

239 Cal. App. 2d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1966

In the case of Griggs v. … (See Horner v. Board of Trustees, 61 Cal.2d 79, 82 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 185 , 389 P.2d 713 ].)

Geftakys v. State Personnel Board

138 Cal. App. 3d 844 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1982

Younger v. … (United States v. State of California (1974) 504 F.2d 750 , cert. den. U.S. v.

Chirmside v. Board of Administration

143 Cal. App. 3d 205 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1983

We do not consider or accept Lionberger as authority for the assertion that the terminable interest doctrine has survived Brown. Henn v. … Board of Education (1964) 61 Cal.2d 612, 627 , fh. 9 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 739 , 394 P.2d 579 ]; see also Patillo v. Norris (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 209, 217 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 210 ].)

Brown Materials Co. v. Pacific Automobile Insurance

52 Cal. App. 2d 760 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1942

Zike v. State Personnel Board

145 Cal. App. 3d 817 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1983

Curia v. … (Martin v. State Personnel Board (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 460 [ 183 Cal.Rptr. 295 ].) But pursuant to the dictates of Skelly v.

Ogden v. Board of Trustees

74 Cal. App. 161 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1925

Evans as members of the Board of Trustees of said city, which city is a municipal corporation of the sixth class. … In Wright v.

Petry v. Board of Retirement

273 Cal. App. 2d 124 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1969

Board of Retirement, 198 Cal.App.2d 397, 408 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 256 ]; Rau v. Sacramento County Retirement Board, 247 Cal.App.2d 234, 236 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 296 ].) … (Marcucci v. Board of Equalization, 138 Cal.App. 2d 605, at p. 608 [ 292 P.2d 264 ]; see also Whoriskey v. City & County of San Francisco, 213 Cal.App.2d 400, 408-409 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 833 ] ; Oxman v.

Martin v. State Personnel Board

46 Cal. App. 3d 558 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1975

Martin (Martin) filed a petition for writ of mandate against State Personnel Board of the State of California 1 (Board) seeking a peremptory writ of mandate directing Board to set aside its decision in case No. 5691 and to … Martin had the burden of establishing before Board that her noncompliance with rule 64 was excusable. (Shaddox v. Melcher, 270 Cal.App.2d 598, 600-601 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 80 ].)

Harris v. Board of Education

72 Cal. App. 2d 43 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1945

(Learned v. Board of Education, supra.) … (McLaughlin v. Claussen, 116 Cal. 490 [ 48 P. 487 ]; *50 Smith v. Whittier, 95 Cal. 279, 287, 288 [ 30 P. 529 ] ; Welch v. Stratton, 73 Cal.App. 765, 768 [ 239 P. 380 ].) In Smith v.

Silvers v. Board of Equalization

188 Cal. App. 4th 1215 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2010

(Chen v. Franchise Tax Bd. (1998) 75 Cal.App.4th 1110, 1114 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 268 ]; Diamond Benefits Life Ins. Co. v. Troll (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1, 5 [ 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 581 ].) B. … (California Assn. for Safety Education v. Brown (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1264, 1281 [ 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 404 ]; Coshow v.

Sibbet v. Board of Directors

237 Cal. App. 2d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1965

(Robbins v. Sonoma County Flood Control & Water Conservation Dist., 138 Cal.App.2d 291 [ 292 P.2d 52 ].) Dismissal is so ordered. Roth, P. J., and Herndon, J., concurred.

Heller v. Franchise Tax Board

21 Cal. App. 4th 1730 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1994

(Id. at p. 142; see also Huxford v. … (Byrne v.

Struckman v. Board of Trustees

38 Cal. App. 2d 373 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1940

Struckman, (own writing), do hereby certify that I have read the policy as adopted by the Board of Trustees of Tracy Union High School on May 11, 1937, at a regular Board meeting. … Board of Trustees from any and all obligations whatsoever to re-employ me, should my character, health, or ability change and become any other than that standard which is maintained by the Board of Trustees for teachers

Doyle v. Board of Supervisors

197 Cal. App. 3d 1358 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1988

The first group consisted of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, its members, and the PIC of Contra Costa County and its director, Arthur Miner, (county defendants). … (Sudomir v. McMahon (9th Cir. 1985) 767 F.2d 1456, 1459 ; Campos v. Employment Development Dept. (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 961, 967 [ 183 Cal.Rptr. 637 ].)

Singh v. Board of Retirement

41 Cal. App. 4th 1180 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1996

Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 72 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]; Bell v. … (Bowen v. Board of Retirement (1986) 42 Cal.3d 572, 578, fn. 4 [ 229 Cal.Rptr. 814 , 724 P.2d 500 ].)

Board of Trustees v. Munro

163 Cal. App. 2d 440 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 1958

(Dethlefsen v. Board of Equalization, 145 Cal.App.2d 561, 563 [ 303 P.2d 7 ]; Molina v. Munro, 145 Cal.App.2d 601 [ 302 P.2d 818 ].) … (Thompson v. City of Long Beach, 41 Cal.2d 235, 241 [ 259 P.2d 649 ]; Oxman v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 153 Cal.App.2d 740, 744 [ 315 P.2d 484 ]; Marcucci v.

Board of Trustees v. Leach

258 Cal. App. 2d 281 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1968

(Hall v. City of Taft, supra, 47 Cal.2d at p. 181.) “The school district is a state agency and its board members are state officers.” (People v. Darby, 114 Cal.App.2d 412, 423 [ 250 P.2d 743 ].) … Thus, in Lansing v. Board of Education, 7 Cal.App.2d 211, 213 [ 45 P.2d 1021 ], the court said: “. . .

Lara v. Board of Supervisors

59 Cal. App. 3d 399 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1976

Appellants’ petition and complaint failed to state a cause of action against the respondent board of supervisors. The judgment is affirmed. Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Keane, J., * concurred. … (Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. Cal. Emp.