Case law

Edwards v. Edwards

90 Cal. App. 2d 33 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1949

In Swanson v. … (Koyer v. Willmon, 150 Cal. 785, 787 [ 90 P. 135 ].) McMillen v.

Megee v. Fasulis

65 Cal. App. 2d 94 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1944

(Citing Brown v. Regan, 10 Cal.2d 519, 524 [ 75 P.2d 1063 ]; Redo Y Cia v. First National Bank, 200 Cal. 161, 166 [ 252 P. 587 ].) It also was held in Pray v. … (Schmidt v. Bauer, 80 Cal. 565 [ 22 P. 256 , 5 L.R.A. 580 ]; Means v. Southern California Ry. Co., 144 Cal. 473 [ 77 P. 1001 , 1 Ann.Cas. 206] ; Goldstein v. Healy, 187 Cal. 206 [ 201 P. 462 ]; Brinkworth v.

People v. J.S.

237 Cal. App. 4th 452 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 2015

(McLaughlin v. State Board of Education (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 196, 222-223) This is not the case here. … (People v. Navarro (1972) 7 Cal.3d 248, 277-278.)

Sealand Investment Corp. v. Emprise Inc.

190 Cal. App. 2d 305 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1961

Elblum Holding Corp. v. … Campbell v. Hanford, 67 Cal.App. 155 [ 227 P. 234 ] ; Pacific Bank v.

People v. Delgado

California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 2018

Brown heard the shooting but claimed not to have seen it. Later, defendant told Brown he thought Cannon was preparing to shoot and defendant shot him to protect Brown. … v.

Olson v. Arnett

113 Cal. App. 3d 59 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1980

Rptr. 821 , 381 P.2d 645 ]; Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz (1976) 57 Cal. App.3d 104, 112 [ 128 Cal. … Interest v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 76 Cal. App.3d 241, 246, fn. 3 [ 142 Cal. Rptr. 766 ]; Metzger v. Silverman (1976) 62 Cal. App.3d Supp. 30, 37 [ 133 Cal.

Downey v. Humphreys

102 Cal. App. 2d 323 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1951

(Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons, supra, 25 Cal.2d 473, 482 .) … (Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons, supra, 25 Cal.2d 473, 477 ; Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons, 28 Cal.2d 28, 32 [ 168 P.2d 153 ].)

Rideout v. Eich

100 Cal. App. 135 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1929

Basing his argument upon the cases of City and County of San Francisco v. Boyle, 195 Cal. 426 [ 233 Pac. 965 ], and Mahoney v. … San Diego Water Co., 118 Cal. 524 [ 45 Pac. 824 , 50 Pac. 670 ], and Higgins v.

Skaggs v. Horrall

83 Cal. App. 2d 424 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1948

As was said in Kavanaugh v. … See also Ludolph v. Board of Police Commissioners, 30 Cal.App.2d 211, 217, 218 [ 86 P.2d 118 ].

Mason v. Superior Court

121 Cal. App. 3d 876 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1981

Other cases holding that law enforcement officers must turn over seized property to the Franchise Tax Board on demand are People v. Freeny (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 20, 30 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 33 ] and Franchise *883 Tax Board v. … (Kanarek v. Davidson, supra, 85 Cal.App.3d 341, 345, fn. 4 .)

Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. v. County of Kern

44 Cal. App. 4th 346 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1996

In Cerini v. … Although significantly distinct from the present case because the lawsuit was brought by a board member against the very board on which she sat, certain observations from Carsten v.

Douglass v. Douglass

130 Cal. App. 2d 609 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1955

(Mondine v. Sarlin, 11 Cal.2d 593, 597 [ 81 P.2d 903 ].) … (Terrell v. Key System, 69 Cal.App.2d 682, 689-690 [ 159 P.2d 704 ]; Dwelly v. McReynolds, 6 Cal.2d 128,133 [ 56 P.2d 1232 ].)

Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. Emmerson

233 Cal. App. 2d 200 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1965

Uridge (1960) 180 Cal.App.2d 1 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 85 ] with Medina v. Brown, supra, 172 Cal.App.2d 208 .) … (Kohn v. Kohn (1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 708, 713-714 [ 214 P.2d 71 ].) 22 See Brown v. Aguilar (1927) 202 Cal. 143, 149 [ 259 P. 735 ]; Treager v.

San Joaquin Finance Corp. v. Allen

102 Cal. App. 400 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1929

L. 211; Van Noy v. Goldberg, 98 Cal. App. 604 [ 277 Pac. 538 ].) … Bank v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc., 191 Cal. 364 [ 216 Pac. 376, 378 ], as an authority in support of the contention that the defendant is estopped.

Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

207 Cal. App. 2d 119 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1962

(Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 535, 544 [ 32 P.2d 135 ].) The business of determining value, whether based upon cost or upon other factors, is the special function of the assessor. … Board of Supervisors, 108 Cal.App. 655 [ 292 P. 539 ], the assessor assessed property which was wholly or partially exempt. In Pacific Coast Co. v. Wells, 134 Cal. 471 [ 66 P. 657 ], and Associated Oil Co. v.

Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. County of Ventura

California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2025

(See City of Petaluma v. … (McClelland v. Board of Supervisors (1947) 30 Cal.2d 124, 128–129.)

Lewis v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · May 29, 2014

(Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini, supra, at p. 679.) … Board of Medical Quality Assurance v.

Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. City of Alameda

56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 2007

(STOP, supra, 1A Cal.App.4th at p. 800; Benton v. Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1481 [ 277 Cal.Rptr. 481 ] (Benton).) … (Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist. v. State Bd. of Education (1982) 32 Cal.3d 779, 795 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 398 , 654 P.2d 168 ], disapproved on other grounds in Board of Supervisors v.

Davis v. Gray

29 Cal. App. 2d 403 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1938

(Gastineau v. Meyer, 131 Cal. App. 611, 616 [ 22 Pac. (2d) 31 ].) … Section 5.711 seems to impose that duty upon the board.

People v. Wickers

24 Cal. App. 3d 12 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1972

At this time Poland observed on the back seat of the vehicle on the passenger side two- jackets, one of brown corduroy and the other a brown leather or simulated leather jacket. … (People v. Henze, 253 Cal.App.2d 986, 988 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 545 ].)