Case law

Edwards v. Edwards

90 Cal. App. 2d 33 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1949

In Swanson v. … (Koyer v. Willmon, 150 Cal. 785, 787 [ 90 P. 135 ].) McMillen v.

Rideout v. Eich

100 Cal. App. 135 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1929

Basing his argument upon the cases of City and County of San Francisco v. Boyle, 195 Cal. 426 [ 233 Pac. 965 ], and Mahoney v. … San Diego Water Co., 118 Cal. 524 [ 45 Pac. 824 , 50 Pac. 670 ], and Higgins v.

People v. Bayne

136 Cal. App. 341 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1934

(People v. Paraskevopolis, 42 Cal. App. 325 [ 183 Pac. 585 ]; People v. Walker, 132 Cal. 137 [ 64 Pac. 133 ]; In re Lee, 177 Cal. 690 [ 171 Pac. 958 ]; Peoples. O'Brien, 122 Cal. App. 147 [ 9 Pac. (2d) 902 ]; People v. … App. 351 [ 22 Pac. (2d) 770 ]; People v. Stratton, 153 Cal. App. 309 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 174 ].)

Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of Orange

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 177 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2005

So it is crystal clear that the Board of Supervisors relied on the V/C method, and the V/C method alone, in approving the project. … (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 564 .)

Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

207 Cal. App. 2d 119 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1962

(Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 535, 544 [ 32 P.2d 135 ].) The business of determining value, whether based upon cost or upon other factors, is the special function of the assessor. … Board of Supervisors, 108 Cal.App. 655 [ 292 P. 539 ], the assessor assessed property which was wholly or partially exempt. In Pacific Coast Co. v. Wells, 134 Cal. 471 [ 66 P. 657 ], and Associated Oil Co. v.

Pittsburg Unified School District v. Commission on Professional Competence

146 Cal. App. 3d 964 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1983

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) … (See Governing Board v.

Henning v. Division of Occupational Safety & Health

219 Cal. App. 3d 747 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1990

(International Business Machines v. … As we further explained in California Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v.

Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. Chuidian

218 Cal. App. 3d 1058 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1990

(Williamson v. Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 829, 836 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 39 , 582 P.2d 126 ]; Allen v. Jordanos’ Inc. (1975) 52 Cal.App.3d 160, 166 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 31 ]; Brown v. … (Flota Marítima Browning de Cuba v. Motor Vessel Ciudad (4th Cir. 1964) 335 F.2d 619 , 626, fn. 20 and accompanying text; Dexter & Carpenter v.

People v. Allen

53 Cal. App. 4th 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1997

Brown (Brown) found defendant “passed out” or asleep on the front lawn of a Martinez residence. Brown awakened defendant and determined he was intoxicated. He arranged for defendant’s transportation to “detox.” … Brown looked inside and discovered six small plastic bags containing a white-colored powder. Brown then arrested defendant. At the jury trial, Susan N.

Newman v. First California Co.

47 Cal. App. 3d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1975

(Cisler v. Ray (1931) 213 Cal. 620, 628 [ 2 P.2d 987 , 79 A.L.R. 584 ]; Liberman v. McDonnell (1929) 97 Cal.App. 171, 178 [ 275 P. 486 ]; Bennett v. Logan & Bryan (1927) 80 Cal.App. 571, 580 [ 252 P. 662 ].) … (People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836 [ 299 P.2d 243 ]; Delzell v. Day (1950) 36 Cal.2d 349, 352 [ 223 P.2d 625 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Respondent is to recover costs. Brown (H. C), Acting P.

Bautista v. State

201 Cal. App. 4th 716 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 2011

Henning v. … In 1945, the Industrial Accident Commission’s broad authority to regulate safety in places of employment was transferred to the Industrial Safety Board. (United Air Lines, Inc. v.

People v. Torralva

17 Cal. App. 3d 686 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1971

The only thing the officer could not be sure of was the nature of the brown substance in the plastic box. These facts justifying the search were stronger than those in People v. Doherty, supra, and People v. … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred.

Aguilar v. Association for Retarded Citizens

234 Cal. App. 3d 21 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 9, 1991

ARC argues Armistead v. State Personnel Board (1978) 22 Cal.3d 198 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 583 P.2d 744 ] and Ligon v. … In these cases, the State Personnel Board adopted new rules or policies applicable to state employees. In Armistead v.

Kaylor v. Department of Human Resources Development

32 Cal. App. 3d 732 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1973

Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, 178 Cal.App.2d 263, 270 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 37 ].) … (Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 54 Cal.2d 519, 532 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 97 , 354 P.2d 6251 ; McCrae v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 30 Cal.App.3d 89, 94 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 159 ].)

Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water District

120 Cal. App. 3d 14 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1981

Board of Supervisors (1977) 65 Cal.App.3d 723, 727 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 588 ]; Kahn v. East Bay Mun. Util. Dist. (1974) 41 Cal.App.3d 397, 409 [ 116 Cal.Rptr. 333 ].) … [Board] and hence beyond the scope of judicial inquiry [citations].” (Associated Homebuilders v. City of Livermore, supra, 56 Cal.2d at p. 854 .)

NBS Imaging Systems, Inc. v. State Bd. of Control

60 Cal. App. 4th 328 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1997

Moncharsh v. … Moreover, and in any event, there is no indication the Board had predetermined its conclusion. (See George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v.

Perry v. Chatters

121 Cal. App. 2d 813 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1953

He merely stated that the defendant board’s decision was not supported by the evidence. Such a statement is merely a conclusion of law and not a statement of fact. (Kelley v. Kingsbury, supra, 39 [3].) … Thus the petition fails to contain an essential allegation upon which to predicate a claim of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the defendant board’s findings. (Dierssen v. Civil Service Com., supra, 64.)

Edson v. Superior Court

98 Cal. App. 367 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1929

Ling, 68 Cal. 324 [ 9 Pac. 171 ]; Thurston v. Clark, 107 Cal. 285 [ 40 Pac. 435 ] ; Woods v. … We quote from the case of Woods v.

SJCBC LLC v. Horwedel

201 Cal. App. 4th 339 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2011

Board of Trustees (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 607, 620 [ 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 309 ]; Public Employment Relations Bd. v. Superior Court (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1816, 1827 [ 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 323 ]; Green v. … Pertinent here is Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind (1967) 67 Cal.2d 536 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 21 , 432 P.2d 717 ] (Eye Dog Foundation).

City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades Council

94 Cal. App. 2d 36 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1949

City of Dallas (Tex.Civ.App.), 198 S.W.2d 143 , both of which are cited and quoted with approval in Perez v. Board of Police Commrs., 78 Cal.App.2d 638 [ 178 P.2d 537 ]; Petrucci v. Hogan, 27 N.Y.S.2d 718 ; Mugford v. … (See Perez v. Board of Police Commrs., supra; King v. Priest, 357 Mo. 68 [ 206 S.W.2d 547 ] ; City of Jackson v. McLeod, 199 Miss. 676 [ 24 So.2d 319 ], Fraternal Order of Police v.