Case law

Jones v. Superior Court

114 Cal. App. 3d 725 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1981

The appellant is correct in noting that the first two of these cases, Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board (1948) 31 Cal. 2d 401 , [ 189 P.2d 17 , 3 A.L.R. 2d 90 ], and So. Cal. Jockey Club v. Cal. etc. … The most recent case, Overturf v.

Longridge Estates v. City of Los Angeles

183 Cal. App. 2d 533 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1960

(Harter v. Barkley, 158 Cal. 742 [ 112 P. 556 ]; City of National City v. Fritz, 33 Cal.2d 635, 637 [ 204 P.2d 7 ], See also Southern Calif. Gas Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 50 Cal.2d 713 [ 329 P.2d 289 ].) … (Harter v. Barkley, supra, 158 Cal. 742 .)

People v. Turner

267 Cal. App. 2d 440 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1968

(See People v. Photo (1941) 45 C.A.2d 345, 353, 114 P.2d 71 ; People v. Brown (1894) 105 C. 66 , 69, 38 P. 518 ; People v. Pillsbury (1943) 59 C.A.2d 107, 111, 138 P.2d 320 ; *444 People v. … (See Roberts v. State, supra, 136 Tex.Cr.Rep. 138 [ 124 S.W.2d 128 ] ; Hooks v. State, 154 Tenn. 43 [ 289 S.W. 529 ]; State v. Brown (Mo.) 217 S.W.2d 546 ; Dixon v.

People v. Schoeller

96 Cal. App. 2d 55 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1950

board. … (People v. Klinkenberg, 90 Cal.App.2d 608, 626 [204 *61 P.2d 47, 58] ; People v. Newland, 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [ 104 P.2d 778 ].) Judgment and order affirmed. Purported appeal from sentence dismissed. Moore, P.

Reynolds v. City of San Carlos

126 Cal. App. 3d 208 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1981

Harmon v. Board of Retirement (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 689, 697 [ 133 Cal.Rptr. 154 ].) … (Summerford v. Board of Retirement (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 128, 130 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 814 ].) C.

People v. Shannon

78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 177 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1998

In support, both texts cite People v. Brown (1894) 105 Cal. 66 [ 38 P. 518 ], which reversed a burglary conviction based on incorrect jury instructions. … However, by mistake Brown took another’s bicycle. Brown was caught before he could return the bicycle.

Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.

224 Cal. App. 3d 674 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 1990

J. v. … “By virtue of this statute the board may dismiss an officer without liability for breach of the agreement to employ.” (Id. at pp. 596-597.) The same result was reached in Cox v. First Nat.

Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of Orange

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 177 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2005

So it is crystal clear that the Board of Supervisors relied on the V/C method, and the V/C method alone, in approving the project. … (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 564 .)

Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

207 Cal. App. 2d 119 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1962

(Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 535, 544 [ 32 P.2d 135 ].) The business of determining value, whether based upon cost or upon other factors, is the special function of the assessor. … Board of Supervisors, 108 Cal.App. 655 [ 292 P. 539 ], the assessor assessed property which was wholly or partially exempt. In Pacific Coast Co. v. Wells, 134 Cal. 471 [ 66 P. 657 ], and Associated Oil Co. v.

People v. Johnson

14 Cal. App. 2d 373 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1936

In People v. … In People v.

Pittsburg Unified School District v. Commission on Professional Competence

146 Cal. App. 3d 964 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1983

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) … (See Governing Board v.

People v. Akins

56 Cal. App. 4th 331 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 1997

(People v. … (People v.

Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of Lynwood

114 Cal. App. 509 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1931

(People v. Stratton, (1865) 28 Cal. 382 ; Patton v. Board of Health, (1899) 127 Cal. 388 [ 78 Am. St. Rep. 66 , 59 Pac. 702 ]; Wall v. Board of Directors, (1904) 145 Cal. 468 [ 78 Pac. 951 ].) … (People v. Harrington, (1883) 63 Cal. 257 ; Patton v. Board of Health, supra; Wall v. Board of Directors, supra.)

Copeland v. Rabing

104 Cal. App. 2d 98 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1951

(Estate of Ayers, 175 Cal. 187 [ 165 P. 528 ]; Schubert v. Reich, 36 Cal.2d 298 [ 223 P.2d 242 ].) … (See Browning v. Browning, 208 Cal. 518 [ 282 P. 503 ]; Wold v. League of the Cross, 107 Cal.App. 344 [ 290 P. 460 ].) In Weil v.

People v. Allen

53 Cal. App. 4th 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1997

Brown (Brown) found defendant “passed out” or asleep on the front lawn of a Martinez residence. Brown awakened defendant and determined he was intoxicated. He arranged for defendant’s transportation to “detox.” … Brown looked inside and discovered six small plastic bags containing a white-colored powder. Brown then arrested defendant. At the jury trial, Susan N.

Newman v. First California Co.

47 Cal. App. 3d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1975

(Cisler v. Ray (1931) 213 Cal. 620, 628 [ 2 P.2d 987 , 79 A.L.R. 584 ]; Liberman v. McDonnell (1929) 97 Cal.App. 171, 178 [ 275 P. 486 ]; Bennett v. Logan & Bryan (1927) 80 Cal.App. 571, 580 [ 252 P. 662 ].) … (People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836 [ 299 P.2d 243 ]; Delzell v. Day (1950) 36 Cal.2d 349, 352 [ 223 P.2d 625 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Respondent is to recover costs. Brown (H. C), Acting P.

Van Houten v. Whitaker

169 Cal. App. 2d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1959

(Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 34 Cal.2d 564 ). … (Brown v. Superior *517 Court, supra, 34 Cal.2d 564 ). The case of Halldin v. Usher, 49 Cal.2d 749 [ 321 P.2d 746 ], where the present point was raised, does not appear to be to the contrary.

Katosh v. Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

163 Cal. App. 4th 56 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2008

(Weber v. Board of Retirement, supra, 62 Cal.App.4th 1440, 1452 .) … (Hallett v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (2000) 431 Mass. 66, 70 [ 725 N.E.2d 222, 225 ], quoting Boston Ass’n of School Adm’rs & Supervisors v.

Aguilar v. Association for Retarded Citizens

234 Cal. App. 3d 21 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 9, 1991

ARC argues Armistead v. State Personnel Board (1978) 22 Cal.3d 198 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 583 P.2d 744 ] and Ligon v. … In these cases, the State Personnel Board adopted new rules or policies applicable to state employees. In Armistead v.

Kaylor v. Department of Human Resources Development

32 Cal. App. 3d 732 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1973

Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, 178 Cal.App.2d 263, 270 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 37 ].) … (Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 54 Cal.2d 519, 532 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 97 , 354 P.2d 6251 ; McCrae v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 30 Cal.App.3d 89, 94 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 159 ].)